Preview

Should College Athletes Be Paid Persuasive Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1432 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should College Athletes Be Paid Persuasive Essay
Persuasive Essay
Drew Miller and Rylee Zedek
12/16/16

Approximately every year 1 billion dollars in athletic scholarships are given out, because of this college athletes should not be paid. College athletes should not be paid because there’s not enough money to give scholarships and pay the athletes at the same time.
For the athletes who are getting scholarships, the players are basically already getting paid to play for their team. If you get a scholarship you are obviously good enough to get noticed by colleges, who are just going to make you better. So, you’ll obviously get noticed by the professional league for getting a scholarship and the fact that you are getting better. According to Paul Daugherty, “scholarshipped athletes are privileged.” He says that they don’t have to pay to be there unlike everyone else therefore they do not need to get money on top of that. Football players get to fly in chartered jets, they get to go to first class hotels, they get to visit some tropical islands and if they are part of bowl games they get weeks and days away and traveling. Even
…show more content…
But in 1948 the NCAA adopted a code that limited financial aid for athletes to tuition and fees. The NCAA has said before and they’ll say it again, they will not pay college athletes. The NCAA is who would make the decision. So it might slightly matter what the athletes have to say about being paid but it is completely their decision. The NCAA is a non-profit. So they would not be able to pay the players so the colleges would be the ones having to pay them, But colleges can’t afford to pay their players. And the colleges have to keep the stadium and or gym clean and renovate it every so often. And players are expecting to get paid? But they NCAA did come up with a compromise, since they would not pay the athletes for playing, they said that they would raise scholarships to cover full college

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    "No one can argue that 98 to 99 percent of college athletes are being exploited," Roberts said. "Most benefit. Most Division I athletes that get a scholarship are in sports that generate no revenue." (Reschke). College athletes don’t get recognized and awarded for their hard work, and effort throughout the season.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    College Athletes should get paid they are the fomor NFL and the NFL get paid millions. When a college athlete gets a scholarship they get a free ride to go play football or whatever the sport is that they play but they deserve that scholarship because they are working hard to get what they want in life and they are getting better everyday.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People like Joe Narcea say that college athletes should be paid. Nocera states that “without that athletic ability, many of them wouldn’t have been admitted,”(Nocera 22). College athletes are multi-billion dollar businesses. The players are bringing in millions of dollars to the universities and they aren’t getting enough recognition. While other students can go get jobs and earn money, college…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    College athletes should get paid for what they do. College athletes aren’t allowed to have a job while in college. And not all college athletes get free education and those are the ones struggling to make it. College athletes bring in a lot of money so they should get some of the money.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some colleges make more money than others. This graph shows the schools with the most profit in their sports programs. Somebody could say that the athletes bring in an enormous amount of money. According to Jeff Dorfman, a professor of Economics at the University of Georgia, only a few collegiate sports actually bring in money. Therefore, an athlete in a sport that isn’t very profitable wouldn’t make nearly get as much as an athlete in a very profitable sport. Along with the sports being very profitable they also have to pay for an even larger variety of different things. Student athletes should not be paid because of the money that would be paid to them. The money that they would be paid could be used to advance other things in the university such as better libraries, science labs, fixing up the dorms, or even improving their athletic facilities. Although the athletes put a lot of time into their schooling and sports the benefits they are given is equal to what they are giving and being…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to senior editor of the Journal of the Business Law Society, Krikor Meshefejian states in his article “Pay to Play: Should College Athletes be Paid,” big-name sports programs at Division 1 NCAA accredited schools (i.e. football and basketball) are money-making organizations. In fact, he cites an article in the Harvard Journal on Legislation, stating, “In the past twelve years, the amount of money generated by these two sports has increased nearly 300%, such that they now fund almost all other sports programs.”(Mashefejian) This statistic provided by Mashefejian proves that college athletics, especially football and basketball, are multimillion-dollar money making programs for schools. Of all the money that these sports programs generate, the athletes that are the real money making producers for the schools see none of it. Yes, the school may make upgrades to the facilities that the student-athletes use, but there is no “real” money being put into the students’…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to “Should NCAA Athletes Be Paid”, found on USNews and World Report, “The NCAA, as a whole makes $6 billion annually. But the players themselves don’t see any of that money…” The NCAA should pay up. These players make the NCAA thrive. Without these players no games will be aired and no money or donations will be given to the NCAA. The NCAA needs to pay these players what they deserve. Money runs corporations, money runs the world, money runs your life, without money you are nothing. Collegiate athletes need to be paid the money from the millions and millions of dollars the NCAA…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Television networks already profit lots of money into college football games from late August to January, which begs the question, should the players get something in return? Should college football players get paid? Some may think that graduating from a four-year university with a degree should be considered way before playing football once a week and treating the college game like some sort of a developmental league for the NFL. Others may take into consideration that all the blood and sweat college football players put into the game should be returned with "funding" in their own pockets. I honestly don't think any college athlete, let alone college football players, should be paid because it will take away the tradition of the college game. The one thing college athletics holds over professional sports is the fact that student-athletes represent their schools, programs, alumni, and student body with a sense of pride and honor every time they go out onto the field or step on the hardwood.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Athletes Pay

    • 1312 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Scholarships that's student athletes receive to play sports in college do not cover the full cost of college universities. In the world of sports , starting from high school a scholarship is an ideal dream of any athlete at any capacity. Scholarships are deemed as a free education and oppurtunity to play at the next level. In the article , "Cash , Check , or Charge ?" The author underlies athletes who receive a "full" scholarship covers room , board , books , tuitions , and fees. All universities estimate that the actual cost if attendance runs between $1500 to $2500. This goes on to disprove , the evolution of why should the NCAA pay college athletes for free question. Whether the athlete walks-on , receives a partial scholarship , or a full ride they'll be paying to attend college and to receive an education. In "Cash , Check , or Charge ? " author Douglas Looney claims "the basic reasons to pay collegiate athletes is that schools and boosters can't be stopped from doing what they do anyway" (n.p). Student-athletes would be less likely to violate NCAA rules by receiving money from sponsors that allocate larger violations for the college-university because receiving money or incentives from boosters results in NCAA infractions and loss of athletes eligibility . If the NCAA allowed stipends or a salary student athletes would no longer run to boosters for bare necessities such as food , clothes , etc. They would have already been provided with enough money to accomplish their…

    • 1312 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To get a sense of the amount of money involved intercollegiate sports such as football. Let’s be clear, football cannot be taught, its either you have it in you or you don’t have it in you, ‘’It’s a God given talent’’. I honestly don’t believe it is fair for football players to not receive a single penny after bringing in thousands and sometimes millions of dollars in the playoff games, and in the championship game. For example, on December 31 2016, Per Adam Jude both teams were allotted 13,000 tickets which equal’s 26,000 tickets, which left 45,228 tickets to be paid for full price. According to www.vividseats.com the cheapest tickets were 180.00 each. There are 20,000 nosebleed seats in this stadium they played in. so if you do the math and calculate 180x20,000, the amount will equal out to 360,000 dollars, which would be the amount of money these football athletes attracted in just off nosebleed seats. The NCAA is a multi-billion-dollar industry that generated over $845 billion last year due to their players’ ability to entertain and perform to their fullest extent always. So, with all this money flowing in why wouldn’t they provide their athletes a stipend? Truth be told, if it wasn’t for these athletes there wouldn’t be no fans, which mean there wouldn’t be no money. So, can you tell how is it fair that these football players can’t receive a single dime after putting in the time,…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some kids grow up with the love of different sports from their childhood. It maybe soccer, football, basketball, or even golf; whatever it might be, it becomes a part of their childhood memories. In fact, they might even take the dream to high school or maybe even college. If it is not a profession you should not get paid. First, a Student-Athlete and the word student always come first. Another reason would be that paying every college student that decide they want to a sport would start money allocation. Lastly, it is not a job it is more of a privilege.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    People are debating many controversial issues locally and globally. One controversial issue, which is relevant today, is whether or not college athletes should be paid or not. One side argues college athletes should be paid while others argue why they should not. For the NCAA this has been a popular topic. People began to discuss this topic when college athletes started to receive special treatment and compensation from scouters to insure that those players would sign with their team when they went onto the professional league. There are many interviews and articles debating this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid. Weinstock argues that college athletes should…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off, college athletes already get paid. They get paid in a way that many others wish they could. They get paid with something that is worth more than any dollar value. An education, and a cheap one at that. Think of the college athletes scholarships as a contract. The school, and NCAA for that matter, pays the athletes with a free education instead of money in return for them playing a sport. Once accepting the scholarship, they understand that they’re payment is a free education. Free tuition,…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should college athletes have to go to class? This is a very debatable question that many Americans have opinions on. As athletes reach the end of their high school career, they usually know if they are going to continue to play sports in college. Some college athletes know they are going to leave school early to pursue their dream as a professional. The NCAA ( National Collegiate Athletic Association) does not want athletes to coast through college until that time comes.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A debate has ensued over whether or not colleges should be able to pay their athletes, due to athletic programs bringing in so much money for schools. Not paying college athletes would be good because students already receive compensation towards college, students are given many auditions to become professional, and college is not a job. On the other hand, others argue that college athletes should be paid because schools and coaches are rich from the students' work students do not have any time to have a job, and not paying the athletes may violate federal antitrust laws. The National College Athletic Association, founded in 1910, oversees college athletics. The NCAA established a rule later on stating that it is forbidden to pay college athletes. College athletes should not be paid because it would be unfair and take away college's real purpose.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays