Preview

Persuasion Techniques in the Workforce

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
786 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Persuasion Techniques in the Workforce
What is the most influential way of speaking that anyone can use that can change one's belief in a matter of a few minutes? The techniques of persuasive language can alter the mind of anyone almost subliminally. The use of such techniques such as rhetorical questions, humor, parallelism, or exaggeration can change the mind even the most swayed believer. Good persuasive techniques are often used in the work force through various instances. People who practice law or are car salesman often find themselves using the effective persuasive techniques to convince others that their idea is the only capable of being correct.
A lawyer is sometimes characterized as being one of the most persuasive occupations in the world. Such controversial cases, as the O. J. Simpson case, support the idea that persuasive speaking can change or hide the truth with some of the effective persuasive techniques. The defensive team, in that case and many other cases like the O. J. Simpson case, used a wide variety of persuasive techniques to persuade the jurors or the judge into believing the unbelievable. When the task of proving an unlikely point seems impossible, good persuasive techniques can make the situation much easier. When a rhetorical question is asked, the strong points of a situation are questioned. The use of a rhetorical question by a lawyer while giving an argument is a very effective skill because it draws skepticism to a reasonable point. The context and use of rhetorical questions, or any other persuasive technique, can very well make or break an argument. Loaded words are sometimes used by attorneys to make an action seem more important or serious than they really is. For an example, if someone steals an object from someone else, and it is put as, "the perpetrator deprived the victim's freedom by taking a prized possession that meant so much to him," the incident is blown to a large proportion they may or may not be as serious as it is put. When jurors receive

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Casey Anthony case shows us how circumstantial is not enough to determine someone’s guilt. In the Casey Anthony case, each side used circumstantial evidence to prove that their story was accurate, and it gave them more room to use evidence as justification to their story. Not having any direct evidence did not give any facts for the judge and the jury to lean on. Not only is it important to have good quality and quantity of evidence (burden of production), but also it is important to use it persuasively (burden of persuasion). The burden of production cannot stand on itself to prove someone’s guilt, but neither can only being persuasive.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the number of people who think the defendant is guilty starts to dwindle, he chooses to use derogatory phrases such as “bleedin’ hearts” to try and persuade people to change their votes. He prefers to use brute force and voiced anger instead of logos to influence people. Although juror #3 frequently contradicts his argument, he dismisses it refuses to admit his…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Specially, the unequal playing field legal actors and the accused are playing on when it comes to the truths about how they perceive, think and behave. As seen in previous chapters, money and race play a big role in the way individuals are tried, and these wealthy individuals are exploiting the weakness in our legal system. Adam Benforado suggest that this way, “If you are rich and connected, you go free. If you are poor and uneducated, you go to prison.” Will only add to the massive unfairness in our justice system. Accordingly, the use of trial consultants has also proved to be a negative for our justice system. Trial consultants collect information on the potential jury pool, discover any correlations that exist, and then target a sympathetic…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What makes this case standout is that it is such a high profile investigation, where Judicial Rhetoric is in used. Since it is fairly recent event not a ton of research has been done on this topic; which is partly why I chose it. Along with the fact that I’m generally curious about rhetoric used by lawyers.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The author did a magnificent job to persuade my thinking toward health care system in the United States that health care should be considered as a fundamental right to all U.S. citizens. The author’s essay was easy to follow, well constructed, and straight-forward to his topic sentence. Writer had a strong introduction, supportive points, and a conclusion. The author provided enough facts to support his /her argument regarding health insurance should be accepted as basic right for all the U.S. citizens just like education. Health care converges are very expensive that a normal person cannot effort. I like the fact he presented in his/ her writing that even citizens with health insurance will still end up paying out of their pocket. Insurance companies more concerns about their profits than providing health coverage. There is always a waiting list or have to wait in line to see a doctor even if you are covered by insurance. The entire U.S citizens have to stand up and fight for their rights. I also realized that the author did not use any I statements, which means the author is not bias. That is true that having health care system to the U.S. citizens will save many lives and courage the health of all Americans.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Courts Real vs Fiction

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This same belief extends to Americans’ knowledge about the law and the judicial system of the nation. There are many things that fictional accounts of lawyers, judges, and courts confuse or create simply to meet the needs of the fiction or make a specific point. Because the intricacies of the legal profession are not well known or explained in school or by the media, unfortunately, people often only have fictional accounts of the law to educate them. The result, unfortunately, is that the majority of Americans have incorrect beliefs of the law, judges, courts, and the persons that interact with them. One of the main differences between fictional portrayals of the court process and real court processes is how the trial is portrayed. In reality, trials are long, boring procedures where attorneys debate, present evidence, and ask questions that have legal value for the judge or jury to arrive at a decision (CA). Many things are said and many witnesses may be brought in to make statements (CA). Only rarely in that process will anything exciting happen. If one were to believe the portrayal of the trial sequence, however, seems as if every minute is interesting or exciting. Trials presented in movies such as My Cousin Vinny or To Kill a Mockingbird, although one is a comedy and one a drama, represent trials as a place where shocking facts are discovered and quick thinking attorneys make major differences in trial outcomes.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Best Defense Analysis

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the first section, “Guilty until Proven Innocent,” Dershowitz (1883) emphasized most criminal defendants are guilty; however, in order to protect the innocent, one must defend the guilty. In other words, defense attorneys defend the person, but they also defend the person’s civil liberties. In the second section “Disturbing the Peace,” Dershowitz (1983) reminds readers of their constitutional rights and natural instincts and the means some take to deny or exploit them. Lastly, in the section “Obstructing Justice,” Dershowitz (1983) exposes the similarities and difference between the prosecutors and defense attorneys’ truths. Each side asserts they want to reveal the truth to the American public, but they decline to mention that the public will never know the entire truth. Essentially, Dershowitz (1983) reveals perjury is all too common on the witness stand. What’s more, judges are aware of this fine line and either choose to ignore probable lies or believe it. In addition, clients with money often get away with their crimes, but the unfortunate and poor defendants often pay…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the major differences between fictional portrayals of the court process and reality is how the trial process is portrayed. In reality, trials are not fast-paced, exciting procedures. They are long and boring procedures. Attorneys debate for hours, present their evidence, and ask questions that only make sense to the judge or other attorneys. Many things are said and many witnesses may be brought in to testify. It is very rare that anything exciting actually happens. Trials portrayed in movies such as A Time to Kill or Runaway Jury, have us believe that shocking facts are discovered and quick thinking attorneys make major differences in trial outcomes. They misrepresent reality by showing crafty defense attorneys suddenly calling a witness or presenting evidence that instantly…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Critical Thinking Paper

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Persuasive thinking is the thought process that is trying to influence someone to accept a message (Kirby & Goodpastor, 2007). This type of thinking is extremely too difficult to master, but when done well can be very effective. The main points to consider when using this type of thinking an individual must understand; human nature, emotions, and think carefully before attempting to get someone to accept a message. An individual must also be aware of the time and the place the message is being communicated, and understands his or her involvement in the message it’s self. Most important, the message being conveyed must be understood, the audience, and the audiences’ values. A thinker that can understand all of these complex pieces of persuasive thinking will be successful at getting the people they are attempting to persuade to accept his or her message.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American justice system allows lawyers to defend their clients, even if they suspect that their client is guilty. The lawyer has a duty to fight for his clients, but not necessarily for the the truth. Jerome Frank, the author of the book “Courts on Trial,” which describes the duties of a lawyer, says, “an experienced lawyer uses all sorts of stratagems to minimize the effect on the judge or jury of testimony disadvantageous to his client, even when the lawyer has no doubt of the accuracy and honesty of the testimony.” (Frank, 2). Former attorney Henry I. Subin describes a case he argued and admits, “I was suspicious of the client’s version of what had occurred, and I supposed a jury would as well. The problem was theirs, however, not mine. All I had to do was present my client’s version of what occurred in the best way that I could” and “I was prepared to stand before the jury posing as an officer of the court in search of truth, while trying to fool the jury with a wholly fabricated story” (Subin). Subin blatantly states that a lawyer can make fabricated statements while appearing to defend the truth, thus further compromising the moral integrity of the justice…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is time for us to show our belief in the value of mateship and a fair go, and give generously to the Good Friday Appeal.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    False Confession

    • 3687 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Oberlander, L.B., & Goldstein, N.E. (2001). A review and update on the practice of evaluating Miranda comprehension. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 453–471. Owen-Kostelnik, J., Reppucci, N.D., & Meyer, J.R. (2006). Testimony and interrogation of minors: Assumptions about maturity and morality. American Psychologist, 61, 286–304. Redlich, A.D. (2007). Double jeopardy in the interrogation room: Young age and mental illness. American Psychologist, 62, 609–611. Russano, M.B., Meissner, C.A., Narchet, F.M., & Kassin, S.M. (2005). Investigating true and false confessions within a novel experimental paradigm. Psychological Science, 16, 481–486. Santos, F. (2006). DNA evidence frees a man imprisoned for half his life. The New York Times, September 20, 2006, p. A1. Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2006). Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 141–142. White, W.S. (2003). Confessions in capital cases. University of Illinois Law Review, 2003, 979–1036.…

    • 3687 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The biggest challenges to persuasion in contemporary political culture is speakers are listening to the other party and tend to be a popularity contest. When I think of persuasion, I think of debate and with debate comes rebuttal. Although we are encouraged to listen to our opponents, we do not truly listen to them, but rather we look to cherry pick certain points, statements or words that would ultimately be useful to our argument. This is a modern-day challenge because of the emphasis being placed on winning. To be regarded as an eloquent/ great speaker, there are characteristics that the speakers must embody. With people modeling their speech patterns to meet those requirements and with speeches being redundant, the speaker would want to stand out amongst other speakers, and so they would want to persuade the audience, and rather than tailoring their speech to the public, they would want to show out their opponent and therefore cherry-picking.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the movies and on television lawyers often win in dramatic ways; they bring in surprise evidence near the end of the trial, or a spectator in the courtroom jumps up and confesses to the crime. These things do not happen in real courtrooms, and clients who expect them to are disappointed. The misconceptions about lawyers have become so widespread that practicing lawyers often question potential jurors about their perceptions. The American Bar Association (ABA) is taking an active interest in learning how the visual media affects attitudes about the profession. This is not to say that movies and television programs featuring fictional…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cross Examination Techniques

    • 15440 Words
    • 62 Pages

    Over the centuries of testing the veracity of witnesses by cross-examination, from Socrates' masterful questioning of his accuser Miletus through the trials that fill courtrooms today, the skills required of the advocate have developed into principles that can be learned, practiced, and mastered by the diligent advocate. The timeless nature of the adversarial skills required of the cross-examiner was recognized by the eminent New York trial lawyer, Francis Wellman, 90 years ago in his excellent treatise on the Art of Cross-Examination:…

    • 15440 Words
    • 62 Pages
    Powerful Essays