Preview

Peace Of Westphalia And The Vietnam War

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
249 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Peace Of Westphalia And The Vietnam War
In contrast with the days of Westphalia, two world superpowers fighting each other over who could gain more global influence is quite a significant change from the bare-bones delegation of the right to self-determination, and though all the prior laws of world order are supposed to apply to subsequent one, they are slightly twisted and worked-around in this iteration. In an examples such as the ideological fight for Vietnam or Korea, one could consider that the people of these nations had an independent decision to decide which alliance to side with, but it would quickly grow into a much larger conflict that held no regard for the objections to the sovereignless nation’s mutually assured destruction. The people of Vietnam were as much as the victims of the war as were the innocent families of Protestant and Catholic faith during the Thirty Years’ War; Which was agreed upon to never happen again post-Westphalia. …show more content…
troops using the same morally compelling rhetoric as seen in the Peace of Westphalia congress; If that is any concert to the replaying of history seen in both events and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The essays by Ambrose, Broyles, Hedges, Kudo, and Styron collectively discuss War in varying contexts, highlighting the effects both before and after war. Some articles intersect on the supporting the idea of another, while others clearly hold opposing views.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peace of Westphalia: Brought to an end the Thirty Year War and the Eight Year War between Spain…

    • 485 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Castlereagh Vs Wilson

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Concert of Europe was an international order created by a series of alliances that allowed Europe to experience the longest period of peace and stability ever known to the continent. The system aimed to preserve the status quo politically and territorially, and it relied very little on power to sustain itself. Rather, it worked by careful design influenced by the Pitt Plan and the errors of Richelieu’s work of the 1600s. Periodically, the involved nations would convene to discuss and agree on issues that could lead to the outbreak of a war. In this way, the system was able to maintain European peace by consensus. Perhaps the most important reason that the Concert of Europe worked was the sense of shared values that united the countries - a moral equilibrium allowed for power and justice to be in “substantial harmony”. In particular, Prussia, Russia, and Austria, the three Eastern powers, considered their unity as the “barrier to revolutionary chaos”. The system only disintegrated when the moral aspect was removed from European diplomacy - this substantiates a claim that the system’s success can be attributed to the moral equilibrium.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The question of whether no single alliance or nation could be held responsible for the outbreak of war is a hotly debated topic. Source 2 strongly agrees with the statement giving the view that no one nation could be held responsible. However, source 1 gives the opposite view that German aggression was primarily responsible, which is supported, to a large extent by source 3, which highlights German imperialistic aims as being a key aggravator. However, it does also suggest that other great powers were also aggressive to some extent. This essay will focus on the idea that, primarily, German aggression was to blame.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First World War’s (1914-18) devastation inspired US President Woodrow Wilson to undertake the ambitious project of designing a series of principles that would maintain everlasting international peace and stability. Amongst these principles was self-determination, the belief that all people have the right to choose their political destiny free from the interference of any external parties. Naturally, the announcement of self-determination was met with a wave of optimism amongst colonised nations like Vietnam, Poland, India, and Egypt. Yet this optimism was quickly stamped out by the Wilson administration’s inconsistent application of self-determination. As a result, this essay asserts that in Wilson’s mind, self-determination only applied…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this chapter, Walzer discusses the cruelty of war and whether there can be any justification for such cruelty. He begins by distinguishing between the justice of war (jus ad bellum) and the justice in war (jus in bello). "War is always judged twice, first with reference to the reasons states have for fighting, secondly with reference to the means they adopt." (p.21).…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry V Ethical Analysis

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It has never been agreed upon that life is an absolute right, but only that death is the absolute outcome. Philosophers call it a prima facie right, this right gets forfeited in actions such as aggravated murder, abortion, physician-assisted suicide, and other heinous crimes. However, the great western powers are on sure footing when it comes to this type of permitted murder, but a just war doesn’t make a total war acceptable. Williams Shakespeare’s play Henry V is loosely based upon England’s own ethical dilemmas in the early 1400’s. This is especially true when conflicting governments go into a war just because one side believes themselves to be in a just war the other may not.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compared to the early 20th century, the wars of today are vastly different. The reasons for fighting, the styles of fighting, and who is fighting are all very different. However, in an age that is far removed from the past, a few things regarding war have remained the unchanged. One of the ideas that has remained unchanged in a time that is every changing, are the rules of war, as described by Michael Walzer in his book, Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally, in a time where so much has changed, there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past, the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War, something the world has yet overcome. For years; life on earth have fought over religion, land, power and yet have reach a conclusion that can over come the obstacles each country has to face. Power, being the superior of something much greater than a small portion of the world is something that can overcome and peace. One can argue that the Thirty Years War was fought because of political issues, however the war was fought because of religious difference between countries of Europe. Causes of the war started because of religious matters, the Peace of Westphalia comes into place setting an example of overcoming the years of destruction , and the Resistance of Protestantism feuding with the Catholics, creating discrimination and almost…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many European nations having this ability prevented any one from rising about the rest. The affect the balance of power had on the Thirty-Years War was its result, and with most of the nations involved being on roughly equal footing there was no clear winner between the Protestants and Roman Catholics. By the Treaties of Westphalia the various nations and religions involved were forced to recognize the others right to exist, if only begrudgingly and to the most minimum extant possible. The Thirty-Years War was ended and peace negotiated by ambassadors, and was not due to any power involved dealing a decisive victory. The balance of power also resulted in previously powerful nations such as Spain relegated to a second class power due to failures in both military might, and the authority and abilities of its ruling…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dear America

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Contention: That soldiers’ justify their actions and regain a sense of themself when seeking to dissolve their guilt in war.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Vietnam War (1965-1975) was fought between the North and South Vietnam. The North was called Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the South was the Republic of Vietnam which was supported by the United States. The war was extremely costly, United States spending over $150 billion dollars. It started with good intentions that got lost in the lengthy battle for the North’s freedom and hopes that America would put a stop to the communistic presence from overtaking Indonesia.…

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This period did not begin instantaneous, the conflict had deep-rooted ideological grounds that begun as an in-depth revolt against Western values. Charles, argues “the ideological and political conflict for the future structure of a united world, carried on for an indefinite period since 1917 by several militant universalism, each of which possess at list one major state.”…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Whereas it appears that a state of war exists between Austria, Prussia, Sardinia, Great Britain, and the United Netherlands, of the one part, and France on the other; and the duty and interest of the United States require, that they should with sincerity and good faith adopt and pursue a conduct friendly and impartial toward the belligerent Powers.…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Towards the end of the Second World War, three of the world’s leading powers came together with their main interest being to defeat Nazi Germany. The Big Three of the Grand Alliance was made up of the leaders of the United States, Soviet Union, and the United Kingdom which included Roosevelt, Stalin and Churchill (Duiker & Jackson, p. 712). The Big Three held two major conferences to plan the defeat and division of Nazi Germany which were known as the Yalta Conference, and the Potsdam Conference. (Seery-Murphy, Nov. 26, 2007). While these conferences were successful in many aspects, there were also a great amount of tensions that arose as result. While the three powers agreed that Nazi Germany needed to be defeated they had disagreements on how the country should be divided and how the postwar world should be run (Duiker & Jackson, pp. 712-713). As result many tensions arose between the United Sates and the Soviet Union, and a war unlike any war the world had known developed.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays