Preview

Outline and Critically Discuss the Statutory and Common Law Examples of `Lifting the Veil` on Corporate Personality.

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2773 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Outline and Critically Discuss the Statutory and Common Law Examples of `Lifting the Veil` on Corporate Personality.
Outline and critically discuss the statutory and common law examples of `lifting the veil` on corporate personality. The corporate veil is a legal concept that separates the company from its shareholders. It separates the personality of the company from the personalities of the shareholders, so that they have separate entities and that the shareholders liability is limited to that they have invested into the company. The corporate veil also protects the shareholders from being personally liable for any of the company’s debts or other obligations, so that the personal assets of its shareholders are protected. However the corporate veil can be lifted if a court determines that a company has not acted in accordance the provisions of corporate legislation or the Companies’ act. A court can also decide to lift the veil if they believe a company is just a sham or in a façade situation, where the company has committed fraud or breached a contract. Therefore if the veil was to be lifted, the company and its shareholders would be treated as the same entity. The companies’ rights and liabilities would be treated as the same as the rights and liabilities of its shareholders. The corporate veil can also be lifted if a court believes a member or members are responsible for the companies’ actions. Therefore if the company where to be sued, the individuals responsible for these activities could be sued as well for damages that they have caused, due to these decisions. The Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd case was a landmark in UK company law, and is the corner stone of company law. Mr A Salomon ran his business for 30 years, and decided to turn his business into a public company because his sons wanted to become business partners. Therefore Mr A Salomon, his wife and five eldest children became subscribers, with Salomon having 20,001 of the 20,007 shares and the rest one share each. After strikes and financial difficulties a Mr Edmund Broderip loaned Salomon £5,000 to


Bibliography: http://www.law-essays-uk.com/resources/2-1-essays/adams-v-cape-industries.php Hicks Andrew & Goo S.H., Cases & Materials on Company Law, 5th ed, (2004) Oxford University Press. http://www.lawteacher.net/company-law/cases/ Cases and materials on company law By Andrew Hicks, S. H. Goo 6th edition 2008 p.121 -------------------------------------------- [ 1 ]. www.law-essays-uk.com [ 2 ]. Hicks Andrew & Goo S.H., Cases & Materials on Company Law, 5th ed, (2004) Oxford University Press. [ 3 ]. http://www.lawteacher.net/company-law/cases/ [ 4 ]. Cases and materials on company law By Andrew Hicks, S. H. Goo 6th edition 2008 p.121 [ 5 ]. Cases and materials on company law By Andrew Hicks, S. H. Goo 6th edition 2008 p.121

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Keller V Inland

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: 1. Beatty, J. F., & Samuelson, S. S. (2010). Introduction to Business Law. (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miller, R. L., & Jentz, G. A. (2010, 2007). Fundamentals of Business Law (8th ed.). Mason, Ohio, United States of America: South-Western Cengage…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legt 2741 Assignment

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages

    However, the precedent in the Saloman Case is not gospel and the ‘corporate veil’ can be lifted in certain circumstances . If the company is used:…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    M2 A1 Bus212

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: Mallor, Jane, Barnes, James, Bowers, Thomas, Langvardt, Arlen. (2012). Business Law.15th Edition.McGraw-Hill Learning Solutions.VitalBook file. Argosy University.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Week 5

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Beatty, J. F., Samuelson, S. S., & Bredeson, D. A. (2013). Introduction to business law. In Introduction to business law (4th, Ch. 11). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    References: Beatty, J and Samuelson, S. (2008), Cengage Advantage Books: Introduction to Business Law. (4th Ed).…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Contract Breach

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Liuzzo, A. (2013, Ch.15, pg.235) Essentials of Business Law (8th Edition) McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: Miller, R. L., & Jentz, G. A. (2010, 2007). Fundamentals of Business Law (8th ed.). Mason, Ohio, United States of America: South-Western Cengage Learning.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    JP Morgan

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Miller, R. L. (2009). Fundamental of business law: Excerpted Cases. (p. 92). New York: Cengage Learning.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Applied Business Law

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Miller, R., & Holowell, W. (2011,2008). Business law text & exercises. (6th ed., pp. 133-134). Mason, OH: Cengage…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miller, R. L., & Hollowell, W. E. (2014, 2011). Business Law: Text and Exercises, 7th Edition. Mason, OH: South Western-Cengage Learning.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Acceptance - Essay

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case of Carrie, Antonio and Norvel, Carrie offers to sell Antonio a set of legal encyclopedias for $300.00. Antonio says he has to think about it and will let Carrie know the next day. Norvel, who overheard the offer to Antonio, tells Carrie he accepts her offer. Carrie gives Norvel the encyclopedias in return for $300.00. The next day, Antonio, unaware of the transaction between Norvel and Carrie, accepts Carrie’s offer. Technically Carrie has not breached a valid contract with Antonio, as he had not accepted the terms of the agreement. There was also no contract between Norvel and Carrie formed since Norvel accepted an offer that was originally made for Antonio.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hanrahan, P., Ramsay I., Stapledon G., Commercial Applications of Company Law. CCH 11th edition 2010…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Applied Business Law - 1

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Roger LeRoy Miller, W. E. (2008). Business Law Text & Exercises. Mason Ohio: Cengage learning.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ian M Ramsay Harold Ford Professor of Commercial Law and Director, Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation The University of Melbourne David B Noakes Solicitor, Allen Allen & Hemsley, Sydney, and Research Associate, Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation The University of Melbourne There is a significant amount of literature by commentators discussing the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil. However, there has not been a comprehensive empirical study of the Australian cases relating to this doctrine. In this article, the authors present the results of the first such study. Some of the findings are (i) there has been a substantial increase in the number of piercing cases heard by courts over time; (ii) courts are more prepared to pierce the corporate veil of a proprietary company than a public company; (iii) piercing rates decline as the number of shareholders in companies increases; (iv) courts pierce the corporate veil less frequently when piercing is sought against a parent company than when piercing is sought against one or more individual shareholders; and (v) courts pierce more frequently in a contract context than in a tort context. ____________________________________________________________…

    • 15226 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays