Preview

Applied Business Law - 1

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
464 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Applied Business Law - 1
Contracts
Tuwana Thompson
Everest Online
Bul 2131-44

Contracts
Delilah, does not return with wood pulp, but brings back three contracts. Acting within the scope of her authority, she contracted with Evon, who knew your identity at the time; Felipe, who knew that Delilah was acting on behalf of someone but not whom; and Giorgio, who did not know that Delilah was acting on anyone’s behalf. For which contracts, if any, are you liable? For which contracts, if any, is Delilah liable? Explain.
For which contracts, if any, are you liable?

I would have to say that I would be liable for all three contracts because I sent Delilah to act on my behalf and according to agency relationship it clearly states that in a principal-agent relationship, the parties agree that the agent will act on behalf and instead of the principal in negotiating and transacting business with third persons (Roger LeRoy Miller, 2008). An agent id empowered to perform legal acts that are binding on the principal and can bind a principal in a contract with a third person (Roger LeRoy Miller, 2008). There are other principles that can hold me accountable for these contracts. An undisclosed principal generally refers to a principal person whose existence is unknown to the third party with whom the agent deals and so, in the eyes of the third party, the agent is the principal. Common law doctrine on undisclosed principals confers rights and imposes liabilities on the undisclosed principal, notwithstanding that he is not made a party to the relevant contract (Reserved, 2006). The rights and duties between the principal and the agent in an undisclosed principal situation are basically the same as in a disclosed principal situation. The agent is to be treated as a trustee for the undisclosed principal of any goods or payments received or any benefit that he derives from the contract with the third party and is liable to account to the principal for such goods, payment or benefit,



Cited: Reserved, E. A. (2006). Esates Agents . Retrieved from Esates Agents Authority: http://www.eaa.org.hk/Home/Publications/AgencyLaw/tabid/208/language/en-US/Default.aspx Roger LeRoy Miller, W. E. (2008). Business Law Text & Exercises. Mason Ohio: Cengage learning.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Corporations Law Assignment

    • 2459 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Where an agent enters into a contract on behalf of a principal, the principal is bound insofar as the agent acts within the scope of their authority, whether real or ostensible[5]. The real authority possessed by Jennifer is that customarily exercised by others in her position, and is not on its own sufficient to render TV Treats liable. However, as was recognised in Panorama Developments,[6] a company secretary also has an apparent authority to enter into contracts of an administrative nature. Whether or not the arrangement of marketing events falls within this definition, TV Treats will be liable for the cocktail party, to the extent…

    • 2459 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Applied Business Law

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Northwest Brands, Inc., is a small business incorporated in Minnesota. It's one class of stock is owned by twelve members of a single family. Ordinarily, corporate income is taxed at the corporate and shareholder levels. Is there a way for Northwest Brands to avoid this double-income taxation? Explain your answer.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ls311 Unit 4

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this case study, we are looking into what constitutes a contract and when a person is obligated to honor a contract. In this scenario Carrie offered to sell a set of legal encyclopedias to Antonio for $300.00. Antonio said that he would think about her offer and let her know his decision the next day. Norvel, who had overheard the conversation between Carrie and Antonio, said to Carrie, "I accept your offer," and Carrie gave Norvel the books. The next day, Antonio, who had no idea that Carrie had already sold the books to Norvel, told Carrie that he accepted her offer. We need to determine whether or not Carrie is obligated to sell her encyclopedias to Norvel and whether or not she is breaching a contract with Antonio.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miller, R. L., & Jentz, G. D. (2012). Business Law Today: Comprehensive, 9th Edition. Mason: Cengage Learning.…

    • 15385 Words
    • 62 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    You run a successful paper mill and send out your three best personnel to secure new wood pulp sources using due diligence and skill. Applying the agency principles outlined in this chapter, answer the following questions. Delilah, does not return with wood pulp, but brings back three contracts. Acting within the scope of her authority, she contracted with Evon, who knew your identity at the time; Felipe, who knew that Delilah was acting on behalf of someone but not whom; and Giorgio, who did not know that Delilah was acting on anyone’s behalf. For which contracts, if any, are you liable? For which contracts, if any, is Delilah liable? Explain.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4. The Defendant is vicariously liable for any such breach of duty on behalf of any of its employees.…

    • 3542 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dawn’s position with her employer is such that she could be considered an agent, or an employee. An agent is when “an employer hires an employee and gives that employee authority to act and enter into contracts on his or her behalf” (Cheeseman, 2013, p. 488). Dawn does not have authority to enter into contracts by the limited information we have,…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Exclusion Clause

    • 2391 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Joe (“J”) is demanding compensation from Fred (“F”) for the damage caused by Fred’s paints. F is attempting to exempt himself from the liability by the exclusion clause written on the receipt and the sign. The effectiveness of the exclusion clauses depends on several factors. Firstly, whether the exclusion clause belongs to a term of contract will be determined. Secondly, reasonable steps leading to the notice of exclusion clause to J will be decided. Thirdly, the words of exclusion clause will be carefully analyzed. Finally, the result as to the exclusion clause will be carefully suggested as well as other possible results if a different situation happened.…

    • 2391 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business Law Assignment

    • 2769 Words
    • 7 Pages

    (a) Dylan was shopping at Quills Department Store when he slipped on the highly polished floor and broke his leg. As a result he was out of work for four months and he incurred considerable medical expenses. His leg did not heal quickly or completely because of a hereditary bone defect which he suffered. Hence he had to take on lighter work, which did not pay as well as his former employment. i) What legal action is available to Dylan against the proprietor of the store, or the cleaner or the floor polish manufacturer The case states that Dylan incurred medical expenses due to slipping on the highly polished floor when shopping at Quills Department Store. This case applied to Australian common law, implied terms of negligence. The first issue is whether the proprietor of Quills Department Store is liable to Dylans injury. In order to determine, there are three steps must be satisfied. Firstly, if the proprietor owed a duty of care to Dylan need to be determined. The cases Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479, Strong v Woolworths Ltd (2012) HCA 5 are applied which implied that a retailer owes a duty to its consumers. In this case, Quills Department Store is an operating store. Dylan is a lawful consumer. The relationship between them satisfied the neighbour test for duty of care set out in Donohue v Stevenson (1932) AC 562. The normal rules of negligence applied to the case of property owners and person injured on the property. Therefore, the store owed a duty to take reasonable care to Dylan. Secondly, it is necessary to examine whether the proprietor had exercise the proper standard of care. The proper standard of care is that how a reasonable person would have responded to the foreseeable risk, to balance risks, consequences and cost. The weighing test is demonstrated in Wyong Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40, Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan 2000 FCA 1099, Woods v Multi-Sport Holdings Pty Ltd 2002 HCA 9. Considering the high…

    • 2769 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Assignment

    • 3092 Words
    • 13 Pages

    You work for Tract and Co, Licensed Conveyancers of High Street, Northtown, Cornwall. You have an appointment with a new client, Miss Helen Troy.…

    • 3092 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agency Law Notes

    • 3597 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Any person, irrespective of his competency to contract, may become an agent, for whose acts the principal may be liable to third parties.…

    • 3597 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    essay

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If a third person has no knowledge about the fact that the agent is acting for a principal, then both the agency and the principal is known as undisclosed ones. The agent of an undisclosed principal can be held liable on the contract as the real obligor as she contracted in that capacity. Similarly, an undisclosed principal can also be held liable as he must also assume its burdens. The liability of an undisclosed principal and the agent is an alternative liability. It means that the third party can only make either the principal or the agent liable and not both of them together. The contract with Giorgio is an undisclosed one can you and Delilah are both liable. The situation is the same with Felipe although the agency is known. He can hold either the agent or the principal liable for the contract. However, even knew that Delilah was your agent and that you were the principal. Therefore you are liable but Delilah is not. Law of agency and undisclosed principal can be summarized as follows. An undisclosed principal may sue and be sued on a contract made by an agent on his behalf, acting within the scope of his actual authority. In entering into the contract, the agent must intend to act on the principal’s behalf. The agent of an undisclosed principal may also sue and be sued on the contract. Any defense which the third party may have against the agent is available against his principal.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Introduction to Business Law

    • 2526 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Protection of environment or in other words environment preservations or preventing environment pollution has been a growing concern of the modern times. As time flies by, and with the theory of global warming and other environmental issues coming into action, protecting the environment is of utmost significance. Every nation has its duty towards protecting their surrounding environment. Protecting environment has become such an issue that nowadays; the perspective of protecting has gone on to cross national borders as well thus becoming a global issue.…

    • 2526 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Question

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages

    UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN ACADEMIC YEAR 2005/2006 DECEMBER EXAMINATION UBML1053 BUSINESS LAW THURSDAY, 15 DECEMBER 2005 TIME: 2.00PM – 4.00PM (2 HOURS)…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Agent is not liable on the Contract made between T and P. (subject to authority given)…

    • 1845 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays