Preview

Organizational Structure

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1058 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Organizational Structure
Organizational Structure

Organizational Structure The Army and the organizational structure that makes it run on the surface is a simple one. It is a Hierarchal/ Chain of Command structure, the orders come from levels so far above those of us at my level that we receive them in the form of Fragmented Orders (FRAGOS), Warning Orders (WARNOS), Military Personnel Messages (MILPER Messages) or simple word of mouth from the First Sergeant or my Platoon Sergeant. These are the only two levels above me in a company. Outside of the company, there is only one additional rank other than that, and that is the Sergeant Major and he is the one that passes the information to the First Sergeant. From there, the messages or orders are passed down from me to my employees, or Sergeants and they handle the Soldiers in our ranks. If you look above the “inner circle” of a Battalion, then you start looking at “Big Army” or the Department of the Army and then eventually Department of the Defense and those decisions are ones that we have no control over (Walcott, C. E., Warshaw, S. A., & Wayne, S. J. 2001). We simply get the order, and execute, the movement of the order is a horizontal and vertical move of the order to ranks. This is the natural order of things and the problems occurs when a subordinate bypasses someone in the Chain of Command and goes directly to a member in the Chain of Command directly, and this can be either way horizontally, because then you start losing track of what that member of the team is doing, or what their level of knowledge of the plan is. (Tanguay, 2006)
In a Tank Company, the first level of management that you will actually experience is the gunner. The lowest rank that he can be is a Corporal and is actually promotable waiting to be promoted to Sergeant. From there you have the Sergeant, and these are the Non-Commissioned Officers where the “metal meets the meat.” They have daily interactions with the employees, the Soldiers

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chain of Command

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The purpose of the Chain of Command is to install structure, discipline and respect into newer enlisted soldiers. Each branch has its own secretary that assigns forces under their jurisdictions to unify and specific combatant commanders they perform missions and report back to their chain of command. The chain of command starts with the Commander-in-Chief and works its way down to the lowest ranking private in the Army. Within the military, the chain of command is a method for leading and communicating. In addition to being a chain of command within the officer ranks, one of the main purposes of the chain of command is to be the back bone of the NCO support channel. The discipline and order that the army maintains is what makes our Army the strongest in the world. From the moment you raise your hand and join the military you do as you are instructed at any time to complete any mission during the time allotted, once completed whoever at the time has to report back to the Chain of Command. The chain of command is extremely important. The importance of the chain of command is that it provides stability inside the work place for when incidents come about that need to be dealt with it sets up the structure for which you report all good and bad thing accidents mistakes tardiness and so on. all incidents in essence are intended to be dealt with on the lowest level before it is brought up to higher personnel as well as other reason's such as it helps build leadership responsibility and common knowledge of how to run a stable work place such as the leadership aspect it helps people who are or would not normally be able to take control of situations and control how things are ran they can take control and help whoever it is with the problem When it works well. When it doesn't work right, leadership is ineffective and some personnel end up doing other people's jobs for them. And can also lead to some sever consequences for the soldier or personnel. The Army has only one…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    AbstractThe Army uses all four functions of management through a Chain of Command. All leaders throughout the military use at least one function, but multiple leaders working together covers all functions. Always someone is planning, organizing, leading, or controlling. The reason the United States Military is so effective is because leadership and management always try to stay a step ahead. The rank structure provides a guideline to how much a soldier manages. More rank brings more responsibility, more respect, and more use of each function. Though not all functions are needed to be a manager, a good manager does need all four. The Chain of Command is the best example to show leadership, management, and the four functions - plan, organize,…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to achieve the nation’s military objectives and victory during conflict, military commanders have to be effective leaders. Their primary mission and concern should be to achieve the military’s goal of defeating the enemy in combat while upholding US policies. Military leaders are very different breed when compared to other types of organizations.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As it is well known in any of the military branches, the chain of command is of high importance. The chain of command is built of out a single soldier. Those single soldiers are made into a squad. Two to four of those squads put together a platoon. From there, three to five platoons makes for a company. In a closer look, a soldier of an E-4 status or below is patrolled by squad leader which is in fact an NCO. An NCO stands for a non-commission officer which their job is to govern the soldiers. The squad leaders then report platoon sergeants which then will go and report to the senior NCO which is also known as the first sergeant. The first sergeant will oversee the company and guide it. This is known as the chain of command that soldiers must follow. Information is shared from highest rank to lowest rank and also from lowest rank to highest rank when needed.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many ways, the history of the America's military is a history of America itself, for it is a projection of America's political, economic, and institutional issues. U.S. military history is both very different and complex. The chain of command refers to levels of authority in the company from the .top position. A chain is a series of connected links, which are made of people or anything in the world. A chain may consist of two or more links.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rank structure goes back to the 1700’s. The rank structure was put into place so that the soldiers had someone that was there to give out orders; also the rank structure was there to teach the newer enlisted respect. If the rank structure was not in place, there would be no order or discipline in the army. The United States ARMY is the World’s strongest army. And it is all because we have order and discipline threw out all of the ranks. When we know that the person out ranks us we need to show the proper respect that they have earned through being in the military and doing their job. As a soldier that has had a lot of mistakes with respecting the rank structure, I know how hard it may be. But all in all you want to respect the persons rank. It does not do anything to the person that you are disrespecting. The one thing that it does do is make them mad. And in all honesty they have a reason to get mad. They have earned their way. They were a private once. It is not like they joined the army as a sergeant. They had to fight their way through the ranks just as most of us have and probably will continue to do. I have always lived by the saying; respect is earned, not given. Well I realized something. The noncommissioned officer has earned the respect that must be shown. If you do not see that they deserve respect. Guess what, the army feels and knows that they do deserve the respect of all their subordinates. So let us all do our selves a favor. Just bite your tongue and drive on. All you have to say is check, roger, or hooah. This…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    organization structure

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gibson, P. (2012). Customer Retention. In P. Gibson, World of Customer Service (p. 118). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.…

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    organizational structure

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Read Hax and Majluf ' 's 1981 article, "Organizational Design: A Survey and an Approach."…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Staff Non-Commissioned Officers are a vital part of any Commander or unit’s team. The staff is responsible for all aspects of a mission given to the unit. The staff can effectively plan and coordinate future missions and receive desired outcomes. Each member of the staff should be confident, technically, and tactically efficient with ability to lead it unit and accomplish the mission. Although most junior Non-Commissioned Officers do not hold staff positions, they still use the same processes of accomplishing daily tasks that are given. All Army leaders use the troop leading procedures and the military decision making process to effectively communicate and plan their task. The units staff Non-Commissioned Officers may all have separate responsibilities…

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    JROTC Reflection

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page

    When I joined JROTC, I was surprised to see that the way I thought the program was run was the furthest from the truth. The mental image I had painted of drill sergeants ordering cadets around was replaced with a ten-person cadet command that controlled many aspects and operations of the battalion. After sitting in on a few staff meetings, I realized that there wasn’t much ordering going on. The cadets were the ones who would decide how to manage events, training schedules, and many other important aspects. This was the first of the experiences that changed my views on leadership for the…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thus, during peacetime operations, the interaction of leaders and followers is complex. During war, this interaction is difficult since the stress of war clouds the ability and willingness of the followers. However, I would like to add a caution that some of our management practices may be counter-productive in war. As managers we attempt to bestow empowerment on our junior personnel through leadership courses and…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we are deployed the Non Commissioned Officers we have been told to listen to could be the one’s who keep us alive. NCO’s are the more mature and experienced soldiers that lead from the front.The non-commissioned officer corps is often referred to as "the backbone" of the armed services, as they are the primary and most visible leaders for most military personnel. Additionally, they are the leaders primarily responsible for executing a military organization's mission and for training military personnel so they are prepared to execute their missions. NCO training and education typically includes leadership and management as well as service-specific and combat training.…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All services of the United States military are arranged organizationally to follow this single chain of command concept. This concept provides a clear structure for orders to flow from the highest levels of the military to the most junior ranking soldier, sailor, airman, and marine. Just as important, this same concept allows information,…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chain of Command

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to Army Regulation six hundred dash twenty, chapter two, paragraph two dash one, subsection (a): “the chain of command assists commanders at all levels to achieve their primary function of accomplishing the unit’s assigned mission while caring for personnel and property in their charge.” What that means is that the chain of command facilitates communication from the highest commander to the lowest private as fast and accurate as necessary in order to get the mission accomplished and the soldiers and equipment taken care of. The chain of command is basically like a ladder, where you go as high or low as you need to, to take care of the issue. It’s designed so that the issues can be addressed and resolved at the lowest level. But, if the issue cannot be resolved at the lowest level, you can proceed to the next echelon to seek a solution. “Proper use of the chain of command is vital to the overall effectiveness of the Army.” [Army Regulation six hundred dash twenty, chapter two, paragraph two dash one, subsection (c)] The enlisted soldiers are required to use the Noncommissioned Officer Support Channel before using the chain of command. The proper way to use this is from the bottom up. First, you speak to your team leader/squad leader, then the Section Sergeant, then Platoon Sergeant, then First Sergeant, and finally the Command Sergeant Major. But when you are in a shop with a Noncommissioned Officer in Charge (NCOIC) and an Officer in Charge (OIC), you speak to the NCOIC first, and if you cannot reach the NCOIC, or they cannot take care of your issue, you speak to the OIC. I did not find any information to support or oppose this assumption. The chain of the command defines the relationship of juniors and seniors within Army organization. An effective chain of command is essential for the Army to carry out its mission. Good leadership supports an effective chain of command.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organizational Structure

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this case study Roger Cahill has been acting as the head of mobile division for less than a year. Currently he is struggling as he faces great difficulties adapting BoldFlash to a changing marketplace. The problem really started a year ago when Mr. Jim Harrison appointed the young Roger Cahill to a VP position. Although Roger has led a research project in his previous work, he is only 24 years old and inexperienced to manage a company at VP level. Positions at those levels require years of strategic leadership and management skills. Nevertheless in the last 12 months, the company focused primarily on the redundant production of customized chips without further research or product development in new and upcoming areas like the storage device. This negligence from both product development and marketing is a huge loss to the company as they missed out on the opportunity to launch new product line; therefore missed the opportunity to penetrate the potential market. Now the company has old products not priced competitively and struggling to penetrate the marketshare. Also the four groups within the division, product development, marketing, sales and manufacturing are constantly in conflict and don’t have the reinforcement from the leadership to work as a team. Although Cahill has observed the dysfunctions, he has not implemented any processes or trainings to work as a cross functional team. The company’s profit margins are low and Cahill has to take initiatives to suggest number of changes. With the staff that has low morale and lacking motivation, Cahill has to develop action plan for improvement. He has to define roles and propose organization change design to deliver an outcome necessary to be successful and generate higher profits.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays