Organizational Structure

Better Essays
Organizational Structure

Organizational Structure The Army and the organizational structure that makes it run on the surface is a simple one. It is a Hierarchal/ Chain of Command structure, the orders come from levels so far above those of us at my level that we receive them in the form of Fragmented Orders (FRAGOS), Warning Orders (WARNOS), Military Personnel Messages (MILPER Messages) or simple word of mouth from the First Sergeant or my Platoon Sergeant. These are the only two levels above me in a company. Outside of the company, there is only one additional rank other than that, and that is the Sergeant Major and he is the one that passes the information to the First Sergeant. From there, the messages or orders are passed down from me to my employees, or Sergeants and they handle the Soldiers in our ranks. If you look above the “inner circle” of a Battalion, then you start looking at “Big Army” or the Department of the Army and then eventually Department of the Defense and those decisions are ones that we have no control over (Walcott, C. E., Warshaw, S. A., & Wayne, S. J. 2001). We simply get the order, and execute, the movement of the order is a horizontal and vertical move of the order to ranks. This is the natural order of things and the problems occurs when a subordinate bypasses someone in the Chain of Command and goes directly to a member in the Chain of Command directly, and this can be either way horizontally, because then you start losing track of what that member of the team is doing, or what their level of knowledge of the plan is. (Tanguay, 2006)
In a Tank Company, the first level of management that you will actually experience is the gunner. The lowest rank that he can be is a Corporal and is actually promotable waiting to be promoted to Sergeant. From there you have the Sergeant, and these are the Non-Commissioned Officers where the “metal meets the meat.” They have daily interactions with the employees, the Soldiers

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    AbstractThe Army uses all four functions of management through a Chain of Command. All leaders throughout the military use at least one function, but multiple leaders working together covers all functions. Always someone is planning, organizing, leading, or controlling. The reason the United States Military is so effective is because leadership and management always try to stay a step ahead. The rank structure provides a guideline to how much a soldier manages. More rank brings more responsibility, more respect, and more use of each function. Though not all functions are needed to be a manager, a good manager does need all four. The Chain of Command is the best example to show leadership, management, and the four functions - plan, organize,…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Below is a list of your immediate chain of command. Ensure that you are going through the proper channels if you are having any issues, questions and/or concerns. Ensure the first person you go to is me. I am your squad leader and I will ensure that any questions you have are answered and any issues you may have WILL be…

    • 2710 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soldier Accountaability

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Soldier accountability is the one of the main responsibilities of the leadership in the Army. Whether it comes from the Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO) support channel or from the actual chain of command. The NCO support channel plays the biggest role in the accountability process. During any type of formation you will notice that the process starts with team leaders ensuring their team is all present passing the information through the squad leader to the platoon sergeant. At this point the platoon sergeant will pass the information along to the platoon leader and company first sergeant. The company first sergeant will then pass the information along to the company commander. At this point if there…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Resources Sergeants

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Army’s way of balancing leader’s roles is by having a rank structure. The rank structure denotes the leader’s role and level of authority and responsibility. With that role comes expert knowledge and work. Leader development is crucial in maintaining a balanced profession. This allows the Army to conduct business in a more organized way. When the leader’s roles are not balanced it makes it difficult for the Army to conduct operations productively. Equally important, such unbalance can affect the trust of our American people as much as the Army’s culture.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Group Incentives Paper

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the unit I work in I am a part of an Operations section which is the heart and soul of the unit. Within the section each soldier is responsible for an individual area of tasking that contributes to the overall success of the unit. There is an Officer, a Non-Commissioned Officer (enlisted similar to a team manager), his assistant who serves more of an immediate supervisor and then each team member. Although we are all work in different positions performing not only different tasks but different jobs altogether; yet we all have to learn and understand each other’s primary positions so that if one team member is unable to work then what other team member is available is capable of stepping in to cover that position and meet those objectives. As an immediate supervisor I am responsible for ensuring that all goals or objectives are being met by the required timelines in order for the team to succeed. I bring to the team knowledge, experience, confidence, and leadership which are my strengths. Using the list of group roles identified by Kenneth Benne and Paul Sheats(Wynn, 2012) I fall in the category of coordinator; because of the team dynamics…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The chain of command will more than likely be able to help you out with your situation, if you need them. This is why it is important to get to know your squad and chain of command as well. One day you will fight with them overseas and need to know that you can trust your brothers. The clarity of your situation is important and without trust nothing is clear.…

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Types of Military Leaders

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Military is one of the largest corporations in the United States of America looking for successful leader’s every day. They offer many developmental classes, schools and academies that give you the tools to become a successful leader. Like most jobs there is a pyramid effect of leadership roles. This pyramid role is called a chain of command in the military. Each leadership role is just as important as the one appointed above them and is only as strong as its weakest link. There are several types of leaders that dictate our military; authoritative, hands-on and hands-off. Each type of leader possesses different qualities which make the outcome of their work diverse.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    JROTC Reflection

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page

    When I joined JROTC, I was surprised to see that the way I thought the program was run was the furthest from the truth. The mental image I had painted of drill sergeants ordering cadets around was replaced with a ten-person cadet command that controlled many aspects and operations of the battalion. After sitting in on a few staff meetings, I realized that there wasn’t much ordering going on. The cadets were the ones who would decide how to manage events, training schedules, and many other important aspects. This was the first of the experiences that changed my views on leadership for the…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Being in the Army for almost 12 years something that I have learned is that there is a manual for everything, leadership is one of them. The manual used for this is field manual 6-22, Army Leadership: Competent, Confident, and Agile, which focuses on many various leadership tools and stories of past leadership within the military. One thing that it has supporting many things within military is three developmental stages. In these stages it expresses what subordinates and leaders need to do to succeed. Stage one is formational which is the beginning stage in this process and the leaders goals are to integrate the subordinate in the unit start growth building skills. The second stage is enrichment where leaders focus on subordinate’s growth…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thus, during peacetime operations, the interaction of leaders and followers is complex. During war, this interaction is difficult since the stress of war clouds the ability and willingness of the followers. However, I would like to add a caution that some of our management practices may be counter-productive in war. As managers we attempt to bestow empowerment on our junior personnel through leadership courses and…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The military uses the shorthand expression “BE-KNOW-DO” to concentrate on key factors of leadership. What leaders DO emerges from who they are (BE) and what they KNOW.[2] As mentioned previously, the US Army and other services are organized in to hierarchies of authority so that they are able to function effectively on the battlefield. The US Army’s hierarchy begins with the individual soldier and extends through the ranks to the civilian leadership including the Secretary of The Army, Secretary of Defense, and The President…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organizational Structure

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this case study Roger Cahill has been acting as the head of mobile division for less than a year. Currently he is struggling as he faces great difficulties adapting BoldFlash to a changing marketplace. The problem really started a year ago when Mr. Jim Harrison appointed the young Roger Cahill to a VP position. Although Roger has led a research project in his previous work, he is only 24 years old and inexperienced to manage a company at VP level. Positions at those levels require years of strategic leadership and management skills. Nevertheless in the last 12 months, the company focused primarily on the redundant production of customized chips without further research or product development in new and upcoming areas like the storage device. This negligence from both product development and marketing is a huge loss to the company as they missed out on the opportunity to launch new product line; therefore missed the opportunity to penetrate the potential market. Now the company has old products not priced competitively and struggling to penetrate the marketshare. Also the four groups within the division, product development, marketing, sales and manufacturing are constantly in conflict and don’t have the reinforcement from the leadership to work as a team. Although Cahill has observed the dysfunctions, he has not implemented any processes or trainings to work as a cross functional team. The company’s profit margins are low and Cahill has to take initiatives to suggest number of changes. With the staff that has low morale and lacking motivation, Cahill has to develop action plan for improvement. He has to define roles and propose organization change design to deliver an outcome necessary to be successful and generate higher profits.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States Army has a very distinct structure to maximize the efficiency of the command and control of soldiers, this structure is called the Chain of Command. The rank structure was created in the 1700’s when the military became a structured element and when away from being a militia with no structure at all. Rank was established to officially appoint someone to give orders to soldiers; also to teach the newer enlisted soldiers respect. If there was no rank structure in the military there would be no organization or discipline in the army. The discipline and order that the United States ARMY has is what makes us the strongest army in the world. When a new recruit goes through basic training the rank structure and chain of command is constantly being drilled into their minds; as well as how to properly utilize the chain. As a new private in basic some soldiers are appointed into student leadership positions to help them understand how hard it is to run a squad or platoon sized element and to show them how much harder it is without the proper use of the chain of command. The soldiers quickly learn that one person can be in charge of a platoon but it is very difficult to handle and control every single individual soldier and their issues. The student leaders learn that the military cannot efficiently function without the chain of command and the use of delegation.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    organizational structure

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Read Hax and Majluf ' 's 1981 article, "Organizational Design: A Survey and an Approach."…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chain of Command

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The purpose of the Chain of Command is to install structure, discipline and respect into newer enlisted soldiers. Each branch has its own secretary that assigns forces under their jurisdictions to unify and specific combatant commanders they perform missions and report back to their chain of command. The chain of command starts with the Commander-in-Chief and works its way down to the lowest ranking private in the Army. Within the military, the chain of command is a method for leading and communicating. In addition to being a chain of command within the officer ranks, one of the main purposes of the chain of command is to be the back bone of the NCO support channel. The discipline and order that the army maintains is what makes our Army the strongest in the world. From the moment you raise your hand and join the military you do as you are instructed at any time to complete any mission during the time allotted, once completed whoever at the time has to report back to the Chain of Command. The chain of command is extremely important. The importance of the chain of command is that it provides stability inside the work place for when incidents come about that need to be dealt with it sets up the structure for which you report all good and bad thing accidents mistakes tardiness and so on. all incidents in essence are intended to be dealt with on the lowest level before it is brought up to higher personnel as well as other reason's such as it helps build leadership responsibility and common knowledge of how to run a stable work place such as the leadership aspect it helps people who are or would not normally be able to take control of situations and control how things are ran they can take control and help whoever it is with the problem When it works well. When it doesn't work right, leadership is ineffective and some personnel end up doing other people's jobs for them. And can also lead to some sever consequences for the soldier or personnel. The Army has only one…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays