Preview

Mr. President

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
872 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mr. President
Mr. President: How and Why the Founders Created a Chief Executive Analysis
On June 1, 1787 Federal Convention first talked of establishing a new executive branch. James Wilson said that the Executive should consist of a single person. To U.S. citizens today, this is an obvious statement, but it wasn’t at that time. Americans had just won their independence from an autocratic monarch, Britain. They feared that another oppressive leader would rise and try to dictate to the newly independence-gained country. In the book “Mr. President: How and Why the Founders Created a Chief Executive”, Ray Raphael explains how the founders created the Chief Executive to specifically prevent this from happening. Ray Raphael’s purpose of writing this book is that he could inform others of how and why the Chief Executive was created. He also wanted to add a little of his point of view on politics today and back then the Chief Executive was created. Raphael supports his ideas and theories very well. An example of him displaying his idea is when he portrays Governor Morris the “savvy” hero of the story. He is kind of biased towards Morris because of the way he describes him (flamboyant, not deceitful, savvy, etc). Ray Raphael also showed his ideas towards the Electoral College many times throughout the book, one quote to show this being, “The concept was simple, even if the mechanisms were not. The people would remain in the picture, but others would make the final choice”. Raphael showed dislike of the system through this statement. Throughout the book I don’t think Ray Raphael lacks any support for his theories or ideas for the reader. From what I read all of his ideas and theories were more or less supported enough to not leave me questions from reading, so no questions were left by Ray Raphael either, in my opinion.
In order to show how the Founding Father’s views changed as they struggled to find a way to appoint a leader that would not have the power to complete oppress

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution guarded against tyranny through checks and balances. Checks and Balances is where the three branches work together to make sure no one branch has too much power. Each branch receives control over the other branches. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay wrote the federalist papers in 1787 and 1788. According to Doc. C, and Federalist paper number 51,” Constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices is in such a manner… check on the other.” James Madison, is explaining how the government got split into three branches. Next he explained that the three branches were framed/setup to check on each other…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a review of the book “The History of the American Presidency” by John Bowman, published in 2005 by World Publications Group Inc. & JP, consisting of 200 pages. This book illustrates the evolution of America’s presidency since its inception. This review discusses the author’s main arguments and its strengths and weaknesses. It also discusses the credibility of the author and whether he was successful in attaining his purpose. Finally, my concluding view of the book will be provided.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People elects a person to the house of representatives and supreme court, so person wouldn’t have too much power : dangerous for the U.S. They divided the gov’t powers into three independent parts to prevent tranny. In Document C there aim was to divide and arrange the several offices into the three branches, so they won’t be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other. Tranny was prevented by giving each branch powers to block the other branches. I’m showing that without the three branches in the constitution the branches would make any rule they want without having someone telling them…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They came up with an idea called checks and balances. James Madison wrote, “The three branches should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” Checks and balances were created to make sure each branch could check the others and have some involvement in the decisions of the other branches (Doc C). Some examples of the control they have are that, the President can nominate the judges, but the court can declare presidential acts unconstitutional. Congress can impeach the President, but the President can veto Congressional legislation (Doc C). This was a success in stopping the dominance of one branch over another, and checks and balances allowed each branch to have a say in final…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of Grover Cleveland’s speeches is the “First Annual Message”. Most of the speech stated “Contemplation of the grave and responsible functions assigned to the respective branches of the Government under the Constitution will disclose the partitions of power between our respective departments and their necessary independence, and also the need for the exercise of all the power intrusted to each in that spirit of comity and cooperation which is essential to the proper fulfillment of the patriotic obligations which rest upon us as faithful servants of the people. The jealous watchfulness of our constituencies, great and small, supplements their suffrages, and before the tribunal they establish every public servant should be…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As soon as the Americans first broke away from Britain, they wanted their government to not resemble Britain’s at all. By doing this, they adopted the Articles of Confederation that had no national executive branch. However, because the government under the Articles of Confederation had about no power because it couldn’t raise money through taxes, the people who led the national government came to realize that a more centralized government was needed. As the constitution was written and it was in the process of being ratified by all the states, the federalist papers written mostly by Alexander Hamilton were written. In one paper by James Madison, he writes “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition” (Doc I), which shows the concept of checks and balances could be used to keep the national government in line and controlled. The Constitution, finally ratified, was similar to Britain’s government but also different in its more active system of checks and balances.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    When the Constitution was first written by America’s founding fathers, they intended for the executive branch to serve the nation’s citizenry by keeping their best interests at heart, but stated that in no way should this branch be more powerful than any other—it be constantly checked and balanced by the legislative and judicial branches.. In James Madison’s Federalist Number 48, he states that in a representative republic, “the executive magistracy is carefully limited; both in the extent and the duration of its power”1. The founding fathers never intended for the role of President of the United States of America to become ‘imperialistic’, meaning that the government takes too much control, and is too involved in the affairs of the nation. However, during the time of the Great Depression and after Franklin Delano Roosevelt was inaugurated, the government became progressively more involved in American society; this trend has continued through Barack Obama’s presidency in present-day politics. Each new presidential term is faced with new dilemmas, which vary and have evolved significantly from issues of the past, and after each one, the federal government becomes more and more involved and, as a result, increasingly ‘imperialistic’.…

    • 2910 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because the Constitution gave the Presidents such limited power, Congress dominated the executive branch until the 1900’s when Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, and Woodrow Wilson asserted themselves providing the turning point in the 1930s for presidential power. Franklin Roosevelt, gained power through his New Deal programs to regulate the economy and the war required that he lead the country in foreign affairs as well. By these things the power of the president has increased massively in both constitutional and evolutionary ways. As the power increased the presidents decided to be surrounded with advisors to that are now called cabinet. Currently The Cabinet includes the Vice President and the heads of 15 executive departments…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When American 's leaders assembled in Philadelphia in 1787, they originally had the goal of solving issues that had arisen from the Articles of Confederation, which had governed the young nation since separating from Britain. Instead, they drafted a completely new document that established a more permanent and effective central government. With it, they established the office of President of the United States. Rather than being directly elected by the people or selected by the legislature – as described by Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers – the head of state was to be elected by an independent institution that existed solely for the purpose of finding a man who was up to the job: a group that would become known as the Electoral College. However, as the political nature of the country evolved in an unanticipated and partisan way, the independence of this body became increasingly irrelevant, resulting in a system which fails to meet the standards of a true modern democracy. Although the Electoral College system has never substantially been reformed, it is now a mere formality which leads to the types of campaigns which it was designed to prevent.…

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    He attempts to highlight those who oppose him so that the people of New York can understand the motives behind the resistance to the Constitution. Hamilton distinguishes his challengers by categorizing them into two different forms, the first as “[A] certain class of men in every State to resist all changes which may hazard a diminution of the power emolument, and consequences of the offices they hold under the State establishments” (Hamilton). This group of men is in opposition to the establishment of the Constitution due to their fear of a loss of power which is given to them by the states. Their power will be lessened due to the Constitution working as the supreme law of the land and forming a union that reduces the control of individual states. The second group of men that Hamilton describes are those who resist the forming of the Constitution so that they may take advantage of the nation, “[A]nother class of men, who will either hope to aggrandize themselves by the confusions of their country, or will flatter themselves with fairer prospects of elevation from the subdivision of the empire into several partial confederacies than from its union under one government” (Hamilton). It is by establishing the opposition, that Hamilton simplifies the arguments of those who are against him. He then goes on to display that these men who act wrongly, however,…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why does our country run the way it does? Obviously, because of the Revolutionary War. We did not want any kind of ruler that had all the power, all at once. So, why is that? What did the found fathers of our country come up with in the 1700’s to protect the colonies from tyranny? After the war, none of us wanted to go back to the kind of monarchy that England had. But, the government we had established-- known as the Articles of Confederation -- had no central government at all. So, the delegates had to figure out how to guard the country against tyranny, while also forming a stable, working government. The founding fathers established a non-tyrannical government by setting up a separation of powers, establishing checks and balances, and splitting up the power held by big and little states.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Checks and Balances

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Constitution grants all legislative power to the Congress. The Congress is bicameral and a bill has to pass both houses: the House of Representatives and the Senate. In this way the houses check and balance each other. Both the executive and the judicial branch check and balance the Congress ' legislative power. Although only the Congress can make laws, the President has the power to veto bills, in which case the bill can only pass with a 2/3 majority in both houses. Finally, if the Congress and the President agree on a law, the Supreme Court has the power of interpreting the laws and a power of review, i.e. the Supreme Court can declare a law unconstitutional and therefore void. As chief administrator the President is required to see that laws are carried out, to enforce…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to the separation of powers, the U.S. government is divided into three branches that each perform different functions: Congress makes the laws, the president enforces the laws, and the judiciary interprets the laws. However, the three government bodies are not completely independent of each other; through the system of checks and balances, the three branches of government are in fact very involved with one another because they are able to exercise restraint over the other branches’ powers. After living in the colonies under the rule of an English monarch, the founding fathers knew firsthand what unrestrained government power could and would lead to; this absolute power was something they did not desire for the American people. The system…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Barack Obama is the most qualified candidate to run for the president of the United Sates of America. I believe that his plan of moving forward will indeed move us forward. Obama has interesting views that I agree with, and you should consider them, as did I. The first issue is innovation, more jobs and reviving manufacturing and the auto industry.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    mr admin

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Please give an example of exceptional customer service you have either provided or received and how this was delivered?…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays