Preview

Alexander Hamilton Federalist No. 1 Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1119 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alexander Hamilton Federalist No. 1 Analysis
As the Revolutionary War reached its completion, the United States (U.S.) sought to form a permanent and strong nation. This prompted Alexander Hamilton to write the article, “Federalist No. 1” in supplication of the citizens of New York to ratify the Constitution. Hamilton believed that the Constitution would unite the United States under one central government and it was the duty of the American citizens to determine their form of government based off of the common good. He creates his argument by establishing the important choice U.S. citizens have, emphasizing that learning all information about both sides is crucial, and voicing his concern that one must not be swayed by their self-interests or cathartic ideals. It is through the creation …show more content…
1” by voicing his beliefs that the U.S. will only survive with the creation of a Constitution. Without it, the country will not grow nor become the independent nation it strives to be, “The subject speaks its own importance; comprehending in its consequences nothing less than the existence of the union, the safety and welfare of the parts of which it is composed, the father of an empire in many respects the most interesting in the world” (Hamilton). Hamilton displays that the nation will only stand with a Constitution and it is the obligation of its citizens to form a government based on reason. Each society will choose to create a government that derives from fact or from force. Hamilton works to depict that the people of the United States are unlike any of their predecessors due to the ability to form a country that stems from logic and reason, “[T]o decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force” (Hamilton). It is due to their unique and crucial position which enables them to make decisions from reason, that the U.S. citizens must recount all information from both sides of the governmental …show more content…
He attempts to highlight those who oppose him so that the people of New York can understand the motives behind the resistance to the Constitution. Hamilton distinguishes his challengers by categorizing them into two different forms, the first as “[A] certain class of men in every State to resist all changes which may hazard a diminution of the power emolument, and consequences of the offices they hold under the State establishments” (Hamilton). This group of men is in opposition to the establishment of the Constitution due to their fear of a loss of power which is given to them by the states. Their power will be lessened due to the Constitution working as the supreme law of the land and forming a union that reduces the control of individual states. The second group of men that Hamilton describes are those who resist the forming of the Constitution so that they may take advantage of the nation, “[A]nother class of men, who will either hope to aggrandize themselves by the confusions of their country, or will flatter themselves with fairer prospects of elevation from the subdivision of the empire into several partial confederacies than from its union under one government” (Hamilton). It is by establishing the opposition, that Hamilton simplifies the arguments of those who are against him. He then goes on to display that these men who act wrongly, however,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the Federalist No. 72, Alexander Hamilton states that re-eligibility should be ensured in order to prevent an executive from extending his term in office unconstitutionally. Hamilton presents five effects that would occur if a president would only be allowed to serve for a single term. Some of the effects that Hamilton presented are, a reduction in the president’s motivation to be on his best behavior since he would not be concerned about getting re-elected. Another issue that would result if re-eligibility would be denied is that if a president who holds office is obsessed with wealth he might get involved in corruption since he would soon be prohibited from office. The author’s purpose is to establish re-eligibility in order for an executive…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The author of the book, Thomas J. DiLorenzo, presents excellent arguments with strong evidence of the contradicting political ideas between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. A thorough investigation and research is evidenced through many trusted sources that present logical information on the constitutional thoughts of Jefferson and Hamilton. In this book, DiLorenzo calls Hamilton the Founding Father of Crony Capitalism, an aristocratic New Yorker, and, above all, a nationalist. The author also points to Hamilton and Lincoln are the responsible for opening the floodgates of corporate welfare and corruption, two of the biggest problems of America’s economic problems. The following paragraphs will provide an organized summary of the content of the book.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton believed that power was necessary for doing a thing. For example, power was needed in collecting taxes. Chapter 34 of Hamilton’s writings in Federalist paper is more about the concurrent jurisdiction, which covers the matter of taxes. It was argued that the concurrent jurisdiction played and important role by the power of revenue raising. Hamilton argued higher tariffs could affect consumers, because he believed that higher tariffs meant higher prices. Besides, higher prices would create monopoly that would put the market in a difficult situation. Hamilton’s altogether vision, which was seen as impossible by him, because it was also impossible to have different, trade members and occupation. He argued that the government should consider merchants as patron and friend. The most important thing was to keep taxes low, because it was the only boundary between the poorest to the wealthiest. Hamilton was disappointed about the poll taxes, because he believed that poll taxes should be imposed when…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamiltonian, Lieutenant- colonel, First U.S. Secretary of the Treasury and Secretary of State and spent his time devoted to the rich and wealthy individuals of Virginia. Though I have little knowledge on today’s congress, senate, and military. What I do remember is that what we have in common with Hamilton is,” Strong central government, order and organization, Industrial development, Helped establish a financial credit for the U.S. government. Hamilton had a firm belief that the rich, powerful and well educated should have the control on the government. Which in all honesty looking at today modern times, I can fully agree that the much upper class controlling the government, why? To be blunt money talks in future and I’m sure during 1780s and 90s it did as well, the rich and well educated people would rather spend his or her tax money on what they believe is right each upper class individual have a grasp on politics. Hamilton’s strong belief is still going strong today and being applied through the Senate Congress…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Alexander Hamilton (2004), Ron Chernow tackles the errand of depicting America's most questionable Founding Father. The book gives an expansive perspective of the scene of early America, with unique accentuation on Hamilton's accomplishments and his relationship to certain Founders.Before understanding this book, my contemplations concurred with the prevalent picture of Hamilton as a splendid however tyrannical man who was as often as possible required in outrages or in clashes with different Founders. I heard that he pushed government, protectionism, mercantilism, a solid government, and a national bank. I additionally realized that he had something to do with the Constitution and thought of a portion of The Federalist Papers. I realized…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is fact that the policies and strategies of Thomas Jefferson served and facilitated a vital equilibrium to ideas of Hamilton. Support of Jefferson of states’ rights and farming assisted to balance the influence of the Hamilton-helping mercantilists and companies. Though, in the absence of Hamilton’s offset, the policies of Jefferson may become the administration weak and unsuccessful to treat with huge domestic and international crises.…

    • 5544 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton said, “He wanted a strong federal government”(Doc 1). The benefits of having a federal government was that the country would have a stronger say over policies than States. Hamilton know that if we had a federal government(Doc 1). If states had power and we needed to apply a law/act for the country it would be harder to apply rather than if we had a federal government. Hamilton's idea for having a federal government is a great idea that would give the country more power and a stronger say over laws/acts. Hamilton’s idea to have a strong federal government is another of his many great ideas to improve the…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However Jefferson had supported the average man unlike Hamilton who excluded the poor in his plans for the government and economy. Another example would be that Hamilton’s plan could become corrupted from the chosen few to become greedy and lead into tyranny. Jefferson had instead believed in divided power and in a weaker central government as he feared for a strong central government to take away liberty. The people participating in the federal government could be tempted to serve themselves rather than the people. Jefferson believed in the common people, calling them the “chosen people of God” (8). However Hamilton trusted only the rich and educated to partake in the government which would result with where the “poor would become poorer”…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Revolutionary- Federalist Era, politics, parties, programs, policies, and people made an enormous difference in how the new nation should be structured and run. During this era, two men in particular championed politics and their respective parties. These two men were Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, and Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican. Both Hamilton and Jefferson were successful college educated intellectuals and politicians who made significant contributions to the development of the United States policies and programs. However Hamilton, despite never being elected President, had more influence over the development of the United States’ policies and programs during the Revolutionary-Federalist Era. Historically Hamilton and Jefferson are known for agreeing to disagree over just about every policy being discussed during the establishment of government structure, and decorum. And it is Hamilton’s policies on economics, government structure, and constitution interpretation, which took precedent over Jefferson’s.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamilton spent his whole life career fighting the Jeffersonian people. He thought that the focal point of governing should be done by the federal government. The government and Jefferson’s ideals succeeded over Hamilton and the federalists. The government created the separation between powers and also passed the alien sedition acts of 1798. They were some of the…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Jefferson often showed a strong dislike for the Federalist laws and programs, when he took office he left many of the Federalist programs intact, and except for revoking the excise tax, the Hamiltonian system was mostly left as it was. However, this act of Jefferson’s went against many of the political beliefs held by his party and himself. Jefferson and Hamilton’s philosophies differed greatly in that Jefferson adhered to a weak central government, with most of the power in the hands of the states. He believed that the federal government’s power should be restrained and limited, so that it would not be able to become tyrannical or try and undermine the power of the states and the people.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamiltonian Federalists

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Consisting of vicinities of wealthy or "urban" populations the main philosophy behind its functioning was loose interpretation of Constitutional powers and ideals. A prominent leader, Alexander Hamilton, believed that in order for the country to be most competent with the modern world the "wealthy and well-educated" ought to have the most influential say in governing. His ideological foundation rested on the need for financial security. In order to gain this an instituting of various things must take place, which would serve as the basis of conflict.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With a new national government under The Constitution, many feared that it could fail to be effective just as the Articles failed, but the acts of Washington and Adams during their presidencies would disprove this fear. For example one of the first things Washington did in his presidency was to establish the first presidential cabinet. The presidential cabinet was a group of four men (Thomas Jefferson- Secretary of State, Alexander Hamilton- Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Knox- Secretary of War, and Edmund Randolph- Attorney General) selected by Washington himself to be his advisers, and help to carry out his duties. The effectiveness or ineffectiveness of his cabinet would appear almost immediately with the rise of Hamilton’s financial plan. Hamilton’s plan called for a funding of national and state debt at par to show the reliability of a strong federal government and establish federalism. But this part of his plan fueled sectionalist ideals between the north and south. Another part of his plan was to establish a National Bank to regulate the economy and establish a national currency. This part of his plan did make the government more effective but it went against Democratic-Republican ideas of a strict interpretation of the constitution, which increased partisan tension. And the last point in his plan was to raise taxes on general goods and excise taxes on luxury goods. When Washington second term came to a close he left the country with three “rules” to follow in his farewell address; avoid sectionalism, avoid political parties, and avoid permanent alliances. These “rules” set a great structure for a young and successful government, but inevitably, weren’t able to be followed.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So after that he had been noticed, he had to go to the constitutional convention so not only he went he has been asked about what should the constitution have. So he had made some propositions for the constitution. During that time he wrote a paper on all of them in the “ Plan of the Union.” (Hamilton 1) This paper shows that the propositions that he had made when they asked. There are 12 things that not only include the right of the people but also the laws of the land. That would mean that all people has equal protection including the president, senate, and everyone else. As you can see that Hamilton really learned that freedmen should have full citizenship rights, that took two years to finally understand that you can live without people doing your…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Alexander Hamilton’s writing, “The Federalists Papers No. 68,” Hamilton argues that the president should be democratically chosen through representatives of each state. Each state should have the same amount of votes as they have senators and representatives. The delegates should be able to decide between candidates and know their qualifications for the job. The delegates should meet in their state and tell the national government what their decision is. In order for the candidate to be elected they must have a majority of votes: if there is not a majority then the House of Representatives will decide who will be president. The Vice President is the candidate who has the second highest amount of votes. The Vice President will be the presiding…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays