Table of Contents
MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS DEFINED
CULTURE AND EMPLOYEES
VEBLEN AND GOODWILL
MAKING M&A SUCCESSFUL
IDENTIFICATION OF OPPORTUNITIES
SPEED OF INTEGRATION
COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE
This paper presents the issues with mergers and acquisitions and discusses the methods to make M&As more successful in an attempt to determine if they are helpful or harmful to the companies, their shareholders, and the economy as a whole. II.
Mergers & Acquisitions Defined
Acquisitions are the absorption of a smaller firm by a larger firm, while a merger is the combination of two firms to form a single entity. In a merger, there is often an exchange of stock between the companies where one company issues shares to the shareholders of the other company at a certain ratio. The firm whose shares continue to exist is generally referred to as the acquiring firm while the other is the target firm. Except for synergies, the post-merger value of the two firms is equal to the pre-merger value. The target firm's shareholders, however, often benefit because they are paid a premium for their shares. Synergies are revenue enhancements and cost savings gained through the merger/acquisition. To measure the success of a merger/acquisition, one must determine if the value of the acquiring firm is enhanced by it. III.
Firms conduct mergers and acquisitions for a variety of reasons. There are performance factors, market factors, and agency (management) factors. Mergers also occur in a variety of ways; from pre-planned executions to last-minute opportunities. A.
Mergers are often undertaken to improve some measure of performance. These can include cost savings opportunities, increased revenue and improved efficiency. Mergers can also fuel overall growth and provide competitive advantages to the merged firm. (Segil 2004). Some studies have shown that mergers can positively affect returns for the shareholders of the acquiring firm (Stahl 2004). B.
There can also be market factors that contribute to merger decisions. A firm in a slow-growing industry may make an acquisition to achieve growth through a new market. Firms may also react to changes in the market by integrating vertically or horizontally to capture a larger portion of revenues. Mergers and acquisitions can also allow firms to more quickly respond to market trends than organic growth would allow. (Gulati 2004) Market share is also widely used as a rationalization for mergers. However, the evidence suggests that, although market share may be an incidental motivation, the primary motivation in this regard is revenue growth. Additionally, increased market share does not necessarily translate into increase market power. (Sudarsanam 2004) C.
Mergers and acquisitions also occur in a number of ways. A firm may identify a target in advance and then either approach it or wait for it to become available. On the other hand, a firm may make an acquisition just because the opportunity presents itself and is determined to be helpful to the firm. (McNaught 2004) Pre-planned mergers tend to be more successful, as will be discussed later. IV.
There are many potential issues with a merger or acquisition. In fact, the Synergy Trap reports that sixty-five percent of strategic acquisitions and mergers result in failure; meaning negative returns in shareholder value and market share (Marcum 2003). Differences in culture between the two organizations, leadership problems, keeping customers happy, and keeping employees happy are all issues that can arise. A.
Culture and Employees
When two organizations merge there is a period of adjustment as both firms...
References: Camara, Don and Punit Renjen (2004), "The Secrets of Successful Mergers: Dispatches from the Front Lines," Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 25 Issue 3, 10-14.
Cornehls, James V. (2004), "Veblen 's Theory of Finance Capitalism and Contemporary Corporate America," Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 38 Issue 1 (March), 29-58.
Gulati, Ranjay and Kenneth W. Freeman, George Nolan, John Tyson, Kenneth D. Lewis, and Robert Greifeld (2004), "How CEOs Manage Growth Agendas," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 82 Issue 7/8 (July/August), 124-132.
Hake, Eric R. (2004), "The Appearance of Impairment: Veblen and Goodwill-Financed Mergers," Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 38 Issue 2 (June), 389-395.
McNaught, Tony (2004), "Most M&A 's Fail!" New Zealand Management, Vol. 51 Issue 6 (July), 41-42.
Moyer, Don (2004), "The Sin in Synergy," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 82 Issue 3 (March), 131.
Pooler, Richard (2005), "When Cultures Collide," Management Services, Vol. 49 Issue 1 (Spring), 28-31.
Segil, Larraine (2004), "Partnering: Metrics Matter," Financial Executive, Vol. 20 Issue 9 (December), 30-35.
Signorovitch, Dennis J. (2004), "Hidden in Plain Sight: Assessing the Challenges of Leadership Change," Public Relations Quarterly, Vol. 49 Issue 3, 4-6.
Smith, Steve and Dave Marcum (2003), "New-School Thinking," T+D, Vol. 57 Issue 10 (October), 36-44.
Stahl, Gunter K. and Andreas Voigt (2004), "Meta-Analyses of the Performance Implications of Cultural Differences in Mergers and Acquisitions," Academy of Management Proceedings, pl1-5.
Stultz, Rene (2003), "Do Shareholders of Acquiring Firms Gain from Acquisitions?" Research Technology Management, Vol. 46 Issue 6 (November/December), 62.
Sudarsanam, Sudi (2004), "Discussion of Increasing Market Share as Rationale for Corporate Acquisitions," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 31 Issue 1/2 (January-March), 249-256.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document