Preview

Marx Vs Durkheim

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1607 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marx Vs Durkheim
The rise of Karl Marx and Émile Durkheim’s ideologies came when industrialization was on the rise in Europe. They both dissected this role of industrialization in the rising economic system of capitalism. They examined the demands of division of labor and what this subsequently did for the existing nature of society. Marx and Durkheim had differing opinions of the importance of the division of labor and rise of capitalism and how this either divided society or aided to its collective nature. This essay will take a look at each of the sociologist’s main differing ideologies, then we will bring it back together with their collective views of alienation and anomie.
Karl Marx is a conflict theorist. His work focuses on what conflicts arise in
…show more content…
According to Marx, capitalism and division of labor can cause alienation, this stems from “material conditions in which we apply our essential productive capacities (Appelrouth and Edles 2016:47)”. There are four different types of alienation explained in Marx’s “Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844”. The first being, the worker being alienated for what they are producing. The proletariat would not be able to afford what they are producing because it is only affordable to the bourgeoisie. The second type of alienation is the worker being alienated from the act of working itself. This is because the worker is doing very specific and minor acts within the grand scheme of production; this leads to the third type of alienation, which is the worker being alienated from being a “species being”. This is the lack of man living up to their full potential, isolating them from their own body and nature itself. The last form of alienation is alienating the worker and other workers. According to Marx this is a way to keep the proletariat oppressed and uneducated, never achieving “class consciousness” (Marx 1844:49-55). This source of alienation creates widespread devastation across the working class. The Proletariat is barely making enough to live a decent life, while the bourgeoisie is living in complete excess. This concept of alienation is very similar to Durkheim’s concept of anomie. He specifically looked at this in his work “Suicide”. This division of labor can lead to intense feelings of anomie. This comes in the form of lack of integration among society and lack of moral regulation. This intense isolation, or alienation, can leave one feeling totally alone, separated from their communities and their families. Durkheim asserts that a consequence of this is ammonic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Émile Durkheim (1858 – 1917) was also a sociologist, social psychologist and philosopher like Mead, except, unlike Mead, he was French. His three major works include “The Division of Labor” (1893), “Suicide” (1897), and “The Elementary Forms of Religious Life” (1912) and he believed that they all explained a social phenomena. Durkheim’s theories were based on things that were external in nature as opposed to those that were internal in nature. The division of labor occurred when social organization shifted from being traditional (Mechanical Solidarity) to modern (Organic Solidarity). In the olden days, people were self-sufficient, feeding themselves and their families, bounded by similarities in religions, values, societal norms, occupations, backgrounds,… However, in the modern…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    men are separated from their creative faculties. When there’s increased dol, (car assembly line) they just do that all day. (or smith’s dol in pin factory. Efficient. But its disasterous for the human pschy.) ppl become alienated from their work product. Marx’s problem: value equals market value. Labor…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the industrialization movement began, there was more of a blend between the classes, and now there is a distinct separation between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Because of the industrialization of the countries, the replacement of manual labor with the use of machinery and the division of labor, the work of the proletarian has become homogeneous. It does not contain the individuality or charm of the laborer as handmade goods do. The worker instead becomes part of the machine and is reduced to performing menial, repetitive tasks. Thus, the workman's pay rate reflects his work, and is reduced to minimum amount needed to barely sustain them. Therefore, as the skill needed to perform the job reduced, so does the amount of the wages. Also, as industrialization increases, so does drudge and toil. The worker become, in the eyes of the bourgeois in control, a part of the machine and as expendable and as easily replaced as any part of the machine. This is in the forms of prolonged work hours, amount of work done in a certain time, or by the increase of the speed of the machinery, which wears down and drains the workers.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The capitalist system caused the alienation of the workers, therefore causing them not to be able to live to the fullest…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a country that lives off the back off capitalization, the majority of people wake up every morning to go to a job they either love or hate, for a wage of money to help them stay afloat in life. Majority of the jobs that are worked in this capitalizing society are jobs where someone is producing a product for someone over them who pay them. They do not produce the product for the benefit of themselves, but for the benefit of their employer. This is Marxian definition of alienating labor. Marx states Alienating labor estranges man’s own body from him, as it does external nature and his spiritual essence.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Race Class Gender

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. the alienated labor is when” private property and its owners hires and controls others and defines labor for them” Instead of results of one’s labor benefiting one’s self, the labor becomes a function that benefits the property owners (184). Therefore, capitalist get to hold on to their money by the “means of production”(184). In a capitalist society Owners vs. non-owners, conflict the rises between the “haves” and the “have not’s” are inevitable. Class structure is maintained by 3 mechanisms; State (ruling class asserting their common interest 185), Ideology (Ideas that support and legitimizes the position of capitalist 185) and the capitalist structure itself due to custom an training views the condition of capitalism a normal process and creates a dependency of workers on the system which makes it hard to resist or rebel. For Ma0rx the important issues structure of economic relations that drives everything else(185, 186. His ideology correlates with contemporary society because of the overabundance of productions which then leads to bankruptcy (2009 housing crisis)(188).…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx and Emilie Durkheim both try to make sense of modern society using sociological theories, but in very different ways. Both Marx and Durkheim’s theories are structural, meaning that society functions within social constraints that have been set prior to individuals birth. Free will is controlled and kept within the norms the structure has set. The difference between Marx and Durkheim however, is that Marx’s theory is one of conflict while Durkheim’s is one of consensus. This difference leads to the points this essay will be comparing.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I was not aware that we would have to create the most dysfunctional democracy I have ever seen, and then repair it from there. Durkheim's theory of the division of labor focuses around individuals doing what they are good at, and in turn, mastering that craft. This works in a rural society, but as a society progresses and increases in size, the necessity of a division of labor focused around keeping society functioning proves to be more important than making sure you "love your job" as Durkheim believes you should, but as society progresses, a conscience collective is necessary for society to function. Marx's theory focuses more around the fact that individuals are focused around their social class and material possessions rather than the conscience collective. Alienation from the division of labor can take place but allowing that to happen is not how a conscience collective would work out the division of labor. Durkheim's focus around improving people's skills and creating a sense of solidarity versus Marx's focus around doing what you have to since their social class above you will never let you move up into their socioeconomic class. Although alienation may not be the correct way to describe Marx's theory, the resentment that individuals feel towards a particular task is very possible but loving your job as Durkheim says is also…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx Vs Durkheim

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This essay will look at violence both in general and against women through theories by Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx. The article being looked at is “Hidden rise in violent crime driven by growth in violence against women” (Gayle 2016, n.p), the article brings attention to crimes against women being on the rise, both reported and unreported. The article also claims that the rise begins at the start of a financial crisis in the UK. This essay will look at the causes and control of crime in the exploitation, injustice, and class conflict in capitalist society. It will draw on and differentiate relationships between social structure and the organization of law and punishment and investigate the social causes of crime, and social deviance.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were full of evolving social and economic ideas. These views of the social structure of urban society came about through the development of ideas taken from the past revolutions. As the Industrial Revolution progressed through out the world, so did the gap between the class structures. The development of a capitalist society was a very favorable goal for the upper class. By using advanced methods of production introduced by the Industrial Revolution, they were able to earn a substantial surplus by ruling the middle class. Thus, maintaining their present class of life, while the middle class was exploited and degraded. At this time in history, social theorists like Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx challenged the aspect of social structure in their works. Emile Durkheim is known as a functionalist states that everything serves a function in society and his main concern to discover what that function was. On the other hand Karl Marx, a conflict theorist, stresses that society is a complex system characterized by inequality and conflict that generate social change. Both Durkheim and Marx were concerned with the characteristics of groups and structures rather than with individuals.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Few philosophers viscerally strike a chord with their readers, regardless of the subject in question. Yet there is something within Marx's essay, Alienated Labor, that is able to communicate directly to working people laboring even over one-hundred and fifty years subsequent to its publication. There is good reason for this: Marx elucidated a theory of labor in which workers become subservient to the objects they produce, a theory where people are not exalted by their labor, but devalued by it. Marx's concept of alienated labor describes the internal conflict and disparity of workers, be they from the 19th or 21st century, when their existence is contingent upon fulfilling the desires and wants of another and neglecting their own.…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Durkheim did not think Capitalism was as bad as Marx believed it to be, but Durkheim had the advantage of seeing how Capitalism played. Durkheim thought that the division of labor (economic specialization or specialization of labor) was necessary for society to progress and advance. He acknowledged alienation, but argued that it was very rare for this to happen. Progress and advancement was the good that came out of the political and social transformations in the 1800’s, but the preventable deaths and mistreatment of people were some of the bad things that happened for the good to occur. Durkheim was concerned with social solidarity, or the togetherness of social groups.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (To be fair, Schwartz doesn’t mention that many work harder for more money too.) So there is a cost to what Karl Marx called alienated labor. “Too often, instead of being able to take pride in what they do, and derive satisfaction from doing it well, workers have little to show for their efforts aside from their pay.”…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Division of Labor in Society by Emile Durkheim explains how in the modern societies the division of labor affects individuals and society contradicting Marx’s belief that the division of labor will all result to alienation. Durkheim argued that the division of labor is not necessarily “bad” for it “increases both the productive capacity and skill of the workman; it is the necessary condition for the intellectual and material development of societies; it is the source of civilization.” More importantly, it creates a feeling of solidarity among the people. For Durkheim, the result of Division of Labor is positive for there is no need for competition in the sense of struggling just to survive but the division of labor may signify that there are sufficient material resources for all in the society, and in this division allows a certain form of cooperation and because people need each other this produces a solidarity in the society.…

    • 2127 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Durkheim is a functionalist who sees a society as an interdependent organ, it cannot function on its own and division of labour brings about permanent feelings of mutual dependence amongst the people in the society and his perspective’s main aim was to support that division of labour is a pillar for social order (Giddens, 1998: 184), however Marx does not embrace it as much, to him division of labour is like cancer that gets into a human body and destroys it entirely, with no committed function of the life-host, and whose decoupled appropriation of its nutrients deprives the life-host of what it requires to sustain its vital functions(Kahn, 1981: 132). Marx acknowledges…

    • 2126 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays