Preview

Management Styles

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2025 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Management Styles
MANAGEMENT STYLES
Managers have to perform many roles in an organization and how they handle various situations will depend on their style of management. A management style is an overall method of leadership used by a manager. Various management styles can be employed dependent on the culture of the business, the nature of the task, the nature of the workforce and the personality and skills of the leaders. This idea was further developed by Robert Tannenbaum and Warren H. Schmidt who argued that the style of leadership is dependent upon the prevailing circumstance; therefore leaders should exercise a range of leadership styles and should deploy them as appropriate.
• Autocratic
An Autocratic or authoritarian manager makes all the decisions, keeping the information and decision making among the senior management. Objectives and tasks are set and the workforce is expected to do exactly as required. The communication involved with this method is mainly downward, from the leader to the subordinate. The main advantage of this style is that the direction of the business will remain constant, and the decisions will all be similar, this in turn can project an image of a confident, well managed business. On the other hand, subordinates may become dependent upon the leaders and supervision may be needed.
The autocratic leader dominates team members and makes decisions on their own without seeking or allowing input from group members. Autocrats set timelines, tasks and then asks for suggestions / objections. They are quick to both praise and punish. This results in passive resistance from team members and requires continual pressure in order to get things done. Some instances call for urgent action and the autocratic style may be best. Most people are familiar with autocratic leadership and accept it.
Disadvantages
• More group hostility
• More dependence on leader
• More apathy in group
• Slower execution of decisions
Advantages
• More group productivity

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This article is really enlightening on the way autocratic managers affect their subordinates. I was always under the impression that even though an autocratic leader may be frustrating, they are at least very effective. This article shows that they can be for a while but it brings into perspective the underlying prey-predator relationship between the autocratic manager and his subordinates and how that can tear…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Autocratic leader benefits those employees who require close supervision. Creative employees who thrive in group functions detest this leadership style.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    | Is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Autocratic Leadership

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Thus, leaders feel that the best way to conduct their job is to practice different style whichever suits the best to the situation. thus a leader may use transactional leadership style, autocratic leadership style, laissez faire leadership style, participative leadership style, transformational leadership style etc. while practicing the style of autocratic leadership style, the leader would make all the decisions by himself, build strict guidelines which is to be followed by all the employees, having centralized power and authority etc. the leader using bureaucratic leadership style would have strict guidelines for everything while and would want all the activities to go as per the guidelines and may be lacking in flexibility and creativity in operations. A leader practicing charismatic style of leadership or transformational leadership style would be constantly offering inspiration and enthusiasm to its employees and gain high level of commitment from the employees towards the jobs and roles of the organization. A leader using participative style of leadership would be continuously engaging employees to discuss and participate in decision making in taking actions for long term and short term while using their suggestions to form the policies and in building the strategies of the future. A leader who…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Management styles and techniques vary between professionals and managers reciprocate many idiosyncrasies to their subordinates on a daily basis that indicate what level of control he or she is willing to relinquish in order to accomplish organizational goals. Every management style has its time and place. However, the micromanager who uses the directing leadership style faces the most problems. This forum is an attempt to explore leadership/management styles to include the directing, participating, delegating, transformational and transactional leadership styles. A comparison of management techniques is necessary in order to establish a base of knowledge about all five with the end state being to find a definitive solution to when each management technique is appropriate. The focus of the paper is to link micromanagement to the directing leadership style. Then conclude that to negate the micromanagement style of leadership, proper planning, realistic strategies and applying appropriate control techniques are critical to secure a successful relationship with your subordinates which leads to…

    • 3251 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Services

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages

    AUTHORITARIAN: This style is also know as Autocratic Leadership, it is a dictatorial method of leading, low concern for followers and high emphasis on task, typically reinforced with threat, punishment, and often ruthless exploitation of workers, who have little or no freedom to resist or desert. This style is used when the leader dictates policies and procedures, decides what goals are to be achieved, and directs and controls all activities without any meaningful participation by the employees.…

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are various management styles, and to be an excellent manager it’s important to know different management styles. As a leader, a person must find one that fits their personality. Managers have to perform many roles in an organization and how they handle various situations will depend on their style of management. A management style is an overall method of leadership used by a manager.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First, authoritarian leaders are best described as those who dictate orders to the employees and provide clear expectations for what needs to be achieved, when it should be completed, and how. The decisions are quick because there is no consultation or independent input from the rest of the team and typically they make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice. There is also a clear division between the leader and the followers and will dictate working methods and processes to their team. The problems of relying too much on an autocratic style is that it can lead to poor quality decisions because of the lack of input. Team morale can be low with leaders being viewed as bossy when they are unable to contribute ideas. This can result in high staff turnover as they will be unlikely to be felt as valued employees. However, this does not mean there is no place for an autocratic approach. This style of management is often used in an emergency or when speed…

    • 2784 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autocratic leaders also known as strict authoritarian leader do not consult with the workforce and take all responsibilities themselves, they wield a great deal of power and control over their team members . This style is used in situations were very tight deadlines and budgets have to be met and decisions have to be made quickly. Team members would be of the type X…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rte1

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The leadership style I use is a mixture of autocratic and democratic and is situational dependent. I feel it is an effective style due to the very nature of my work. If something has to be done quickly and without thought on my subordinates’ part, I tend to be very autocratic so they are able to focus on what actually needs to be done and not get caught up in trying to decide what the best course of action is. On the contrary, if there is time for decisions to be made, and, especially if the decision is one that will affect more than myself, I try and get input from everyone to get their thoughts. I think this is the best way to get people to buy-in to a process and take a bit of ownership with it.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Management styles can be divided into three main categories of autocratic, paternalistic or democratic and they reflect the ways managers make decisions relating to their subordinates.…

    • 2269 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership Style

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Each leadership style (Authoritarian, Democratic, and Laissez- Faire) has a purpose and depends on the environment for which it is used. I preferably would want to lead an organization in a democratic setting because we live in a democratic environment; therefore our mentalities as individuals are to naturally have an opinion on how we function in our society. Based on its history, this leadership style is most effective because it values team members input, and receiving feedback will always empower them to be a part of something special. Also, this gives them a sense of responsibility and will motivate them to put their energy and effort towards making the organization better; which will make them more accountable.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When thinking of leadership styles one thing to consider is what defines a good leader. Hood (2010) suggests that an effective leader influences and encourages others to achieve goal setting and goal attainment. A good leader recognizes that there is always something new to learn. Effective leaders set direction, build commitment and confront challenges through clear communication and soliciting staff feedback. Authoritarian leaders remain in control, they are task oriented, and are effective in crisis conditions. An authoritarian leader makes decisions and addresses all problems single-handedly. This…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After matching the autocratic style with a mechanistic structured organization and the democratic style with an organic structured organization, it is clear that an autocratic or a democratic leader may have difficulty functioning in the oppositely structured organization. Beginning with the autocratic leader working in an organic organization, one major challenge may be learning to work on a team. Organic organizations tend to have many teams and task forces. An autocratic leader is most comfortable with just making a decision and announcing it, however in a team structure they will most likely have to 'sell' their decision to the group in order to get any response or action. Learning how to communicate and work along with employees could be the largest adjustment an autocratic leader would have to make in an organically structured organization.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Economic globalization has motivated an increasing number of corporations and enterprises to set up branches and production facilities throughout the world. During this process, a manager 's approach is considered to make a difference for the productivity of his or her staff, which partly contributes to the success of the company. Hence, many companies have realized that management style plays an important role, and they tend to take it into account while recruiting a manager. Currently, there is no one persuasive definition about management styles. A common definition on the internet is “a management style is an overall method of leadership used by a manager. There are two sharply contrasting styles that will be broken down into smaller subsets: Autocratic and Permissive”(Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 2000).This definition demonstrates that management styles vary from individual to individual, and also generally points out two strikingly contrasting management styles. However, it cannot sufficiently illustrate the key factors that influence management styles. This essay will discuss these key factors, such as culture, gender, domain and cost of operating companies.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics