Preview

Locke And Hobbes Influence On Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1071 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Locke And Hobbes Influence On Society
Would you like to be ruled by just one person good or bad or have a say in choosing a leader without giving up your natural rights? English philosophers Hobbes and Locke had different sets of ideas about government and people. Hobbes ideas are harsher, but reasonable while Locke’s ideas are moral and optimistic. As the movie, Lord of the flies exemplifies that even though Hobbes believed humans are born with passion and reason, Locke’s ideas would create a much more stable and functioning society because people have the right to life, liberty, property and to revolt against an abusive government.
Locke believed that people have the right to revolt against an abusive government. Having the right to stand up against an abusive government wouldn't
…show more content…
Even though humans do have reasoning and passion that’s not what they are born with. The education we get, the environment we live in and what we are taught by the elders are major factors on shaping humans in good or evil. Education and social organizations also shape our worldview, for example, in the medieval era many people devoted their lives to the catholic church becoming monks and nuns and joined religious orders, so that religious organization such as the church affected their development in good or bad. One other example is of Christopher Columbus and the Spaniards. They were well-developed and resourceful, so they saw themselves as more superior than the Indians who weren’t as developed as the Spaniards. That difference in their perspective was caused by their social organizations, government and environment which led to the Spaniards thinking of themselves better than the Indians. In the movie “Lord of the Flies” Jack was reasonable when he said to Peter that we might never go home because there are probably eight million islands here. This was a reasonable assumption, but on the other hand Ralph who exemplifies Locke assured Peter that we will go home, making a more optimistic observation. When Jack and some other kids turned into wild creatures that was because …show more content…
Jack provided protection to his team, but in return took all their natural rights and made them his slaves. Jack and his team also stole the knife and piggy’s glasses not respecting Piggy’s and Ralph’s personal property which led to Piggy’s death. So, not having the right to liberty and property can lead to stealing which in turn can cause chaos and deaths. Locke likes to have rules and laws as long as people are satisfied. If protecting these basic rights mean to make rules and laws, there should be rules and regulations. Ralph wanted to make rules, for example, whoever holds the conch gets to talk. When the captain was ill Jack did not care for him. He only cared about himself, he stated that “they should care about themselves rather than some ill person”. Jack was rude, non-sequitur and selfish. He believed that people should be protected by a leader because they are selfish and brutal. He was uncaring and selfish himself, so he assumed that everybody else around him was also uncaring and selfish. Ralph did not want to harm the animals by killing them, so he found fruits to survive off, but Jack was too uncaring to think about the harm he was causing when killing and eating pigs. Ralph shared his shelter with others when there was a storm, this shows that he is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    he founding fathers immerged from the British Colonists to become pillars in American history. The revolutionary leaders were immersed with knowledge of educational writings from scholars such as, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, among many more. The knowledge had an immense impact, on the foundations, principles and rights, the revolutionary leaders fought so passionately to establish.…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jack’s main focus on the island is to hunt and harvest a pig for it’s meat since the only other main food sources on the island is fruit. Jack and his hunters are also assigned to help build the shelters for the boys. Ralph finds out that Jack had gone off hunting by himself and the hunters went off to play instead of helping with the shelter : “ “Well, we haven’t got any yet. And we want shelters. Besides, the rest of your hunters came back hours ago. They’ve been swimming”(51). Jack tries to defend the fact that he had to let the boys go so he could focus on the hunt by saying “I went on,” said Jack. “I let them go. I had to go on. I-”(51). This shows that when Ralph comes up with and idea Jack always thinks of something contradictory to it or does something that contradicts the point Ralph has made. Jack represents Locke’s ideas on the state of nature which is “Men exist in the state of nature in perfect freedom to do whatever they want.” These ideals is what leads to Jack creating his own tribe and breaking up the system they had…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lack of an impartial judge is a defining characteristic of the state of nature, and this lack of a common judge can lead to confusion and violence therefore leading to the state of war. The state of nature and the state of war are not two separate concepts but the state of nature has the fundamental problem and civil government is the solution for the problems of the state of nature.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the midst of the Enlightenment Age, a time when philosophers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke were forming new ideas of society and government, a war had started between Britain and its American colonies. The colonists claimed their government was failing to provide for its citizens, sharing Locke’s views of the natural rights of men that a government was meant to…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes believed in a social contract, an implicit understanding between government and governed. His ideal government would be an absolute monarchy that holds power like a leviathan, a sea monster. John Locke, also an English philosopher, believed that people…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page

    Throughout history, people have debated about what government is, and what is the purpose of it. Should the government dictate people's lives and tell them what to do? Should the government be permissive and just allow the people take care of themselves and not step in? Should there be an in between? Two very influential philosophers from the 17th century Enlightenment, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, are preeminent influences on how people see what a government is and what role it should take. They both were renowned influences in many governments, even to this day. Locke took the side that people are naturally good, and that they should rule themselves. While on the other hand, Hobbes said that humans are naturally brutish and evil,…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 18

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Locke agrees with Hobbes that the purpose of government is to create order in society but contends that people are reasonable and would cooperate with each other and could rebel if ruler were tyrant. Ruler stays in power only as long as he has consent of those governed. He said people had natural rights, including right to life,…

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes vs Locke

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Both Hobbes and Locke shared similarities within their political theories; however their theories also had some major differences. Both men were responding to the crisis of the 17th century and they were highly influenced by the scientific revolution. Hobbes and Locke rejected all previous theories regarding human nature. They used the same methodology, and the men accepted an atomistic view of society. They believed that individuals were rational and were motivated by self-interest. Hobbes and Locke traced their theories from a state of nature to the social contract. They agreed that the legitimacy of the government rested on the consent of the governed. Together, both men rejected legitimate political authorities such as Divine Right of Kings, brute force, historical tradition, and feudal contracts. Both political philosophers offered interesting arguments pertaining to government, human nature, and the state of nature.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke and Hobbes

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page

    The founders believed that the power of government should be limited, so it doesn't trample on peoples' natural rights. The framers thus wrote in guarantees that the government could not usurp individual freedoms. Locke believed that citizens gave their consent to the government so that society would operate freely and safely. Government should ensure equal opportunity and protection of political and property rights. The individual is obligated to participate in the political process, but abide by the government's rules. Hobbes is more pessimistic about how violent the state of nature would be and is therefore willing to give the government more power than Locke is. Yes, Americans seem happy that the government has power, but individuals retain rights as well. Unlike many countries, the United States has never had a revolt against its government in the last 200 years (The Civil War was something very…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many philosophers, such as John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, have discussed over the years if he human race is naturally good or evil. People than choice their side of the argument, one side believing that humans have a basically good nature that is corrupted by society, while the other side believes that humans have a bad nature that is kept in check by society. As John Locke believes that the human race is good, it is reasonable to accept as true because we are born neutral, with free will, and fear of a higher power.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke believed that people were civilized and didn’t think people were greedy and selfish. Locke wanted a government that…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On account of the boys failing to implement this basic fundamental into their society it soon results in war. John Locke believed that in order for a government in prosper, it is necessary to bring down the government when it does not protect the rights of citizens. Locke believed that a government is based upon the bond of trust between the people and their authority. The people gave up their freedom, and in turn, they expect the authority to act with the public good always in mind. Any breach of this bond of trust can result in an act of rebellion against the government. In particular, the boys did not try to overthrow the dictatorship of Jack. The arrogant Jack cunningly manages to overthrow Ralph. Jack splits away from the group then he persuades others to join him in hunting leaving Ralph hopelessly outnumbered. Once the tribes split, making Jack the dictator things start to fall apart. As the new leader Jack’s only goal is hunting and he doesn’t care about being rescued. "The conch doesn’t count on top of the mountain" Said Jack," So you shut up" (Golding, 42). Ralph tries to talk things out with Jack but he doesn’t succeed and eventually, disagreements between the two groups became violent. Jack created a society that lost all resemblance of civilization; the boys in his tribe had become completely savage; they painted their faces, hunted, and punished those that went against them. They identified Ralph, Piggy, and their followers as the enemy and their goal was to destroy those would not join Jack's tribe. On the other hand, Ralph tries to talk things out with Jack but he doesn’t succeed and eventually, disagreements between the two groups became violent leading to a war. Hence Jack’s target becoming…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Locke begins his argument by invalidating the idea of divine right by asserting that, “it is impossible that rulers now on…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people believe a government is there to help protect the people in the country, while others believe it is there to be the sole power of the country. In Two Treatises, John Locke states his opinion about a more democratic government very clearly. Locke believes that the government is there to protect the people’s rights and that everyone should be treated equally. Thomas Hobbes is a polar opposite of Locke. In Hobbes’ document Leviathan, he makes it evident that he would rather have a dictatorship or a monarchy.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Locke believed that people are born a free human being. His main idea is his writing was that if a government should fail the people of the country have the right to become or create a new government. The same rules apply if the citizens decide the government is using their power in the wrong ways. As well as the other philosophers and more to come as I write, John Locke wrote many books and was a very influential enlightenment thinker. In one of his books, Second Treatise on Civil Government, written in 1690, he was talking about the dissolution of government. He says,”When the government is dissolved, the people are at liberty to provide themselves, by erecting a new legislative,... they have not only a right to to get out of a failed government, but to prevent it.”(Locke) Okay, that literally is almost a restatement of what I said about his beliefs earlier. This explains that if a government was to be unruly or disrespectful to their people, the people have the right to rebel and create a new law making body. The interesting thing about our government is that if we were in fact to rebel against our government, which we have right to, the government would also then have to right to shut us down and stop the crusade we started. What he is saying is true but what Locke is also saying is what we do with our individual rights can always come back to bite us in the…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays