Preview

Libertarian Approach To Social Justice

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
549 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Libertarian Approach To Social Justice
To what extent do you think the libertarian approach is adequate to explain social justice?
To a large extent
Abstract
The paper mainly discusses to what extent do I think the libertarian approach is adequate to explain social justice. Besides, the paper explains the definition of the liberalism, libertarianism and social justice. After that, the paper discusses how the libertarianism explains social justice based on the definition of the libertarianism and the social justice. Finally, if

Introduction To a small extent, I think the libertarian approach is adequate to explain social justice. Social Justice is a concept of sharing responsibility in a society, arranging social status and allocating resources to the principle of justice, and
…show more content…
On the contrary, according to the “Anarchy, State, and Utopia” written by Robert Nozick (1974), libertarianism refers to liberty as an overriding principle and it is based on individual’s consent (Nozick, 1974). Libertarianism emphasizes on the individual right, and believes that as an independent individual, people have non-transferable basic rights, especially the fundamental right of self-ownership, and it favors the market distribution and minimal intervention of the government, the government should be limited to the maintenance of contracts, the protection of citizens from violence, and the prevention of theft or fraud of their property (Nozick,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the economics realm, Libertarians believe that every individual to have the opportunity to obtain economic…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Classical liberals believe in negative freedom. This is the simple belief in an absence of external constraints on the individual and that they should be left alone to make their own choices. In this way classical liberals were heavily influenced by the natural rights theories of John Locke and Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson claimed that we were born with certain “inalienable” rights and therefore no individual or government had the right to constrict them or take them away. Freedom from constraints is therefor an essential condition for exercising these rights. In practice this has meant that classical liberals have advocated a minimal state, what John Locke referred to as the ‘night watchman state’. The states activities should, in his eyes, be limited to the enforcement of contracts, maintaining order and protection from foreign threats to prevent the state from infringing on individual liberties as much as possible. On the other hand, modern liberals have advocated a more positive interpretation of freedom. Positive freedom can be defined as the ability to achieve true self-mastery and self-realisation in order to fulfil our individual potential. Modern liberals such as TH Green criticised negative freedom on the grounds that it failed to address the social and economic factors that can prevent individuals from achieving their full potential. Negative freedom was inadequate because it failed to remove these barriers to true self-mastery such as social disadvantage and inequality. Modern liberals have therefore proposed an enabling state. Rather than a ‘necessary evil’ as classical liberals believe, the state can be a force for good by protecting individuals against social and…

    • 1082 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once again, the passage that resonated with me was Wheelan's discussion of behavioral economics. At the end of the chapter, Wheelan explains the notion of "libertarian paternalism," which generally means that although you may make mistakes, society won't force you to adapt your behavior to fit their ideals, but will instead point you in the right direction. I found this discussion interesting because it described the passive acceptance of decisions that is becoming more and more common when enacting change requires proactive effort. Some of Wheelman's examples included insurance coverage, retirement savings, and presumed consent for organ donations. When I feel that I don't grasp a situation or concept completely I'm prone to fall into this…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The time has come to exchange the definition of libertarian from an anarchist who believes in selfish activities to a person who cares about the fundamental protection of each individual god given right. In order to understand why the common definition today should…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lisa Newton defines autonomy in the Source Book as “a union of two components. The first is the rationality or understanding; the second is freedom or “non-control”.” There are two separate ideas that correlate with the thought of autonomy. The Libertarian idea is that individual freedom is the priority. It does not matter how good or bad that individual’s choice is, only…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Libertarianism and compatibilism each have very convincing arguments regarding free will, however they contradict each other in several ways. Libertarianism accepts that free will exists and that free will is defined as the ability to act differently from deterministic laws. However, libertarianism rejects that everything occurs according to deterministic laws. The deterministic law can be summarized into a basic principle: Everything is predetermined, all effects are the uncontrollable result of causes. Compatibilists contradict libertarianism by accepting that everything occurs according to deterministic laws. Compatibilists do agree that…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    . .with the intention of better preserving himself, his liberty and property”. Individuals relinquish their absolute freedom and agree to follow laws because a government can protect one’s liberties far better than individuals. Thus, a free society is one in which its government ensures the basic rights of its citizens while maximizing their right to liberty. But what happens if a government neglects its purpose and passes laws that curtail both autonomy and natural rights?…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A particular strand of anarchism i.e.- individualist anarchism, shares a similar approach to liberalism. One key similarity is the idea of sovereign individuals, the most radical ideas originating from Max Stirner’s ‘The Ego and His Own’. Like Marx, Stirner was hugely influenced by the works of Hegel, however coming to the conclusion of extreme individualism i.e.- ‘egoism’. Stirner like some liberal thinkers believed in the term ‘egoism’, e.g.- liberal thinkers like Thomas Hobbes and John Locke accepted that individuals are self-interested or self-seeking, as one of the definition of egoism suggests. However, these liberals would then go on to argue that self-interestedness causes conflict, hence the need of a state, going against every anarchist. Like the individual anarchist William Godwin, any restrictions held on an individual is evil, and if those constraints are enforced by the state, then it is absolute evil. Going back to human rationality, much like Mill and other classical liberals, anarchism tends to share the distrust of the state, and the concentrated importance of individual liberty. Where an anarchist argues the state is unnecessary and evil, many liberals believe the individual is rational, that they have reasoning above any collective body. In addition, as humans are self-interested, the state will…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Liberalism is a political philosophy which emphasizes on the rights of an individual, and usually the rights will assure by the government. Liberalism has turned up for around 300 years, and the complexity to explain and define liberalism is increasing as there are several forms, including classical liberalism, neo-liberalism, conservative liberalism, social liberalism, libertarianism and libertarian socialism (Mastin, 2008). Although anarchism, communism, democratic socialism, social democracy, communitarianism and liberal conservatism have the same objective with liberalism which support for democracy as well as basic equality and against authoritarianism, but it does not consider as liberalism (Haar, 2015).…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many who oppose government and advocate anarchy are in favor of voluntary associations or non-hierarchal organizations. However, the absence of government and presence of anarchy, to many, is unrealistic and dangerous because it can only be favorable to all under the assumption that we, as humans, are inherently good and will not cause mayhem if all law enforcement ceases to exist. Philosopher Immanuel Kant described anarchy as “freedom and law without force,” but to many freedom means being able to walk outside without fear and with the knowledge that our rights are protected by a system put in place in order to inforce the law. While the absence of government does relieve us from the restraints that impede our complete freedom, it also makes our safety completely dependent on the idea that humans are inherently good, an idea that has been proven wrong time and again through systematic racism, slavery, murder, and…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When someone is declared an addict, either by themselves or outside institutions due to their behaviors, they have trouble finding places to live in society. Either they have criminal histories that prevent them from being able to pass a background check that most landlords require, and/or they lack the financial resources to move into a healthy living arrangement. So where are they to live? One option is to move into an Oxford House. Oxford is a worldwide organization whose mission is “to provide all recovering alcoholics and drug addictions the opportunity to develop comfortable sobriety without relapse.” They state these homes are “democratically run, self-supporting.” What was their strategy for social change…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Justice Principles

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Diabetes has been identified as a health priority area, however, many Australians living with diabetes are experiencing inequity within their communities. The social justice principles aim to eliminate this inequity bey developing supportive environments within communities. Social justice can be identified by using the 4 principles: Equity- equity refers to the fair allocation of resources and entitlements without being discriminated against. People in Australia are receiving more income that others making it hard to achieve an equal health status. Individuals with more money are able to access better and a variety of different beneficial health care services aiming to help those with diabetes.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Definition Paper

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Declaration of Independence it states that we have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The right to liberty in my opinion is being able to do as one pleases. Not having to ask our parents for permission to go out, or having to have a curfew to get home. Listening and following directions from our parents is not liberty. It is not satisfying, and definitely not doing as one pleases. Liberty is having freedom. Being controlled by our parents is not having self control of ourselves and our lives. We should be allowed to do what we want, whenever we want to. In the Declaration of Independence the right to liberty is any basic right or freedom to which all human beings are entitled and in whose exercise a government may not interfere (including rights to life and liberty as well as freedom of thought and expression and equality before the law) (Free dictionary). We have the right to think and act on our own judgement. Having the right to liberty is the same as having the right to your life. It is your life, therefor we have the power and liberty to do what you want. The word liberty comes from libertarian, in 1789 the meaning to libertarian was one who hold the doctrine of free will. Liberty, with its root in Latin, had its origin in words for "unrestricted," "independence," and "separation." Liberty separated one from the mass of enslaved humanity and made one independent. My meaning to the meaning people used back then in 1789 is similar to the fact that people have the right to their own freedom. They have the power to be free. In a modern dictionary the meaning of the word liberty means freedom from control, interference, obligation, restriction, hampering conditions, etc.; power or right of doing, thinking, speaking, etc., according to choice. I believe the meaning used today to define liberty is freedom from control. It is meaningful today because people do as they please now. They are free in will and do…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nozick’s book Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Anarchy, State, and Utopia is an objection to Rawls’ A Theory of Justice. Nozick believes in the minimal state, which suggests that the government only has one role in society and that is to protect people by offering police protection, court systems, and military protection from external forces. He will say that anything more than that is a violation of your freedom. For example, Nozick believes that taxation to benefit the less well of in society is a violation of people rights. He understands that police officers need to be paid and it is justifiable for taxes to go towards that but he says systems such as welfare are a violation of people’s…

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self responsibility is one of the major aspects of this type of law; it allows an individual to do anything to his or her body that they please. It is the individuals property and “homestead”. No one should have any control over another’s body, doing so it taking away their naturally born rights. This philosophy drawls many parallels between drug legalization. The legalization of drugs would only directly affect individuals who were willing to participate themselves. Taking away someone’s ability to participate in this sense is the taking away of their “libertarian rights”. As block points out, the current government system takes away or rights to do with our bodies as we please and free choice. It is a form of modern day slavery on some…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays