Compatibilism Vs Libertarianism

Satisfactory Essays
Ryan Mattson
Mr. Stanton
Intro to Philosophy
07 November 2016
Libertarianism Vs. Compatibilism Libertarianism and compatibilism each have very convincing arguments regarding free will, however they contradict each other in several ways. Libertarianism accepts that free will exists and that free will is defined as the ability to act differently from deterministic laws. However, libertarianism rejects that everything occurs according to deterministic laws. The deterministic law can be summarized into a basic principle: Everything is predetermined, all effects are the uncontrollable result of causes. Compatibilists contradict libertarianism by accepting that everything occurs according to deterministic laws. Compatibilists do agree that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The complete opposite of Libertarianism is Fatalism. Fatalism is also known as hard determinism. It states that free will is completely impossible and that physical determinism is true. By that being said, it means that no one is free and everything that one does was determined to be done before they did it. Evidence that backs up fatalism is the fact that there have been tests in which shows that the brain makes decisions for us before we consciously do. The seven second test shows that when asking…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Determinism, Compatibilism, and Libertarianism Patrick C Smith Ivy Tech Community College The question that the textbook poses at the very beginning of chapter four is, “Are you Free” (Chaffee, 2013, p. 172)? Most people would look at this question as pretty cut and dry and would answer a resounding yes. Philosophically speaking, it is not that easy of an answer. You have to be willing to look at the question with an open mind, and ask yourself if the choices…

    • 2349 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    actions I am not responsible for them. As compatibilist holds that free will and determinism are compatible, we can properly understand what it means for our actions to be free so we see that a free action is doing what one wants. Believing in compatibilism doesn't mean the determinist view is false, but if it is true, we can still have free will. I believe that we make decisions based on our own desires and beliefs. It is said that compatibilists attempt to revise and weaken the commonsense notion…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free will, Determinism or Compatibilism? “What I am going to do? Maybe I should do this instead of that? ” Those are some questions which arose when we are facing choices but, do we always have the choice or we just follow the situation or circumstance? Freewill is the power of making free choices that are unconstrained by external (usually psychological) or by an agency such as fate or divine will, while determinism is the belief that since each momentary state of the world entails all…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Debate Between Libertarianism and Hard Incompatibilism 2,062 Words Philip Samaan 1000634986 PHL105, 30/03/2014 Prof. J. Brunning Mark Schranz Robert Kane argues for the existence of free will and for the existence of a deep connection between free will and moral responsibility. Kane firstly establishes that individuals possessing surface freedoms, such as buying what they will at a convenience store or watching what they will on a television set, do not necessarily indicate…

    • 2114 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    responsibilities to the society. The thought is that we are all in this process together; therefore, we should all be treated the same. Egalitarianism is based solely on the person rather than family wealth. This has the best outcomes for society. In libertarianism, the goal is based in having the freedom to operate has desired. This means that every person is entitled to act as he sees fit. Each person must act in a way that is beneficial to the society. It is left up to the individual as opposed to a…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compatibilism

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages

    thoughts and actions are determined by cause and effect implications. It is vital that we are “free to do otherwise” since this gives us accountability for our actions and allows us to attain moral responsibility. Unlike John Martin Fischer’s semi-compatibilism, I hold that determinism does not rule out all alternative actions encompassing “that we can never do otherwise.” I find the compatibilists definition of freedom convincing enough that I can agree to the thesis that determinism exists and that…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    individuals that make decisions voluntarily should be held responsible for their actions which goes against the theory of determinism and compatibilism. Determinism holds that individuals do not possess free will given that their actions are predetermined which prevents individuals to avoid any actions, therefore making them not morally responsible. On the other hand, compatibilism holds that both determinism and the concept of free will are both compatible and one can be a determinist and also believe in individuals…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compatibilism

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages

    independent grounds; (2) accept its reality but argue for its compatibility with free will; or (3) accept its reality and deny its compatibility with free will.In this paper I am going to be defending the view compatibilism, specifically W. T. Stace’s view of compatibilism. Compatibilism is the idea that determinism is true, every event in the world is caused, and that free will still exists. Stace defends this view by saying the problem is the definition of free will. The current definition of…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    is happiness. From this view, any other things than happiness are not valuable. On the other hand, Libertarianism is an opposite principle of utilitarianism. Libertarian principle’s core is freedom of choice without control of laws or moral. This means, individuals take the responsibility of their own choice and do whatever they want without hurting anyone. Self-ownership is the name of Libertarianism principle.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays