Preview

Let The Indians Stay Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
533 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Let The Indians Stay Analysis
Let The Indians Stay!
Way before us, Americans came to this beautiful land called America, there were Indians who lived here. They were here more than one hundred before we came here.. How can it be fair for us to move them off their home? That’s why we should let the Indians stay. The Indians also were treated so unfairly and became modernized like us. So let the Indians stay. First of all the Indians were here way before we came. According to the article “Allow the Cherokee to Stay” by Joan Marshall, it says, “The Cherokee lived in what is the now northern Georgia more than one hundred years before the Georgians arrived.” This quote is saying that the Indians had a great life before we came and ruined it for them. No one would ever give up their land if their whole life just because “new comers” told them
…show more content…
This point of view makes sense because the Indians did waged war on us since 1775 and killed more than 300 men, women, and children. According to the article “Move the Cherokee to Indian Territory” by Jack Andrews, it says, “We should also remember that these Indians have waged war on American since 1775…” Also it says, “In one incident during war 1812, the Creek Indians massacred more 300 men, women, and children when they captured Fort Mims in Alabama.” However, in their defense we did killed so of their own, try to kick them off their land, and a few chiefs signed the Treaty of New Etocha. Therefore the Indians should stay on their own land, and free to live there as long as they want.
In conclusion the Indians should stay on their land because the Indians were on the land way before we did. Also we treated the Indians poorly for years. Last but not least, we all have to admit that the Indians modernized themselves like us, so it should be easy for them to adjust to our life. So these are the reasons why the Indians should stay on their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Yes, I would argue that the Cherokee’s should have fought to maintain control of their land. President Adams lost a competition with Georgia which resulted in the action of removing the Cherokee Indian resident. This operation took place in order to benefit from the supplementary terrain for cotton planters. This Indian tribe was one of the first to relocate. The Native American tribe in addition to others had the right to remain in their territory due to the right granted by the treaty in 1825. Although Adams tried to resist the notion of the Indian Removal, he was not able to find a way to stop William McIntosh from continuing with his unjust plan. Cherokee Indians who resided in Georgia constructed a stable and cosmopolitan culture, their…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Native American Indians inhabited the land of America long before the colonist arrived. After the colonist’s arrival, tension between them and the Native American Indians eventually led to an outbreak of war in which innumerable Indians and colonists perished. The Americans would not allow Tecumseh, “Shooting Star” and the Shawnee to remain on their own land (Wikipedia 1). Tecumseh, a Native American Indian, wanted nothing more than to retain the Shawnee land, continue living their way of life and have peace.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1980 Dbq

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages

    "In examining the question how the disturbances on the frontiers are to be quieted, two modes present themselves, by which the object might perhaps be effected; the first of which is by raising an army, and (destroying the resisting] tribes entirely, or 2ndly by forming treaties of peace with them, in which their rights and limits should be explicitly defined, and the treaties observed on the part of the United States with the most rigid justice, by punishing the whites, who should violate the same. In considering the first mode, an inquiry would arise, whether, under the existing circumstances of affairs, the United States have a clear right, consistently with the principles of justice and the laws of nature, to proceed to the destruction or expulsion of the savages.... The Indians being the prior occupants, possess the right of the soil. It cannot be taken from them unless by their free consent, or by the right of conquest in case of a. just war. To dispossess them on any other principle, would be a gross violation of the fundamental laws of nature, and of that distributive justice which is the glory of a nation. But if it should be decided, on an abstract view of the situation, to remove by force the ... Indians from the territory they occupy, the finances of the United States would not at present…

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Move the Cherokee to Indian Territory” by Jack Andrews, it states, “We should also remember that these Indians have waged war on America since 1775.” This quote shows that the Americans and the Indians have been enemies since 1775. The article also says, “In 1776 the Cherokees ravaged American settlements in North and South Carolina, killing men, women and children. In many cases their victims were scalped alive and even burned at the stake.” This shows that the Americans are justified for the seeing the Indians as enemies because of the way that the Indians have treated them in the past. It would be madness to invite someone who had kidnapped and murdered a friend to stay at one’s home. The opposing side might argue that Americans have treated the Indians badly as well by cheating them during trading and breaking agreements. However, if the Indians were to move away to the Indian Territory, they would be free to govern themselves and would not have to deal with any or all Americans ever…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971 the Cherokee tribe was in the process of making treaties with United States. The state of Georgia recognized the Cherokee tribe as a nation allowing them to make their own laws and follow their native customs. In the late 1700’s their land started to be invaded by the white man. The Cherokee Indians began to move to Arkansas. (Historical Context) I believe the Indians were taken advantage of and had no option but to move when their land was taken away from them. Georgia and the United States had no regard for the treaties that were put in place. The treaties changed depending on who was in office at the time, the Indians had no choice but to move and give up their land. United States v. Georgia, Chief Justice John Marshall, stated “the Cherokee nation was a domestic independent nation, and therefore Georgia state law applied to them.” When Georgia continued to press the tribe for their land the “Treaty Party” began to make treaties with the federal government to give up their land. The majority of the tribe disagreed with the New Echota treaty where their land was sold for $5 million dollars and the tribe had to move beyond the Mississippi River. Due to corrupt government and the demands of President Andrew Jackson and President Martin Van Buren in 1838, the Indians were “rounded up” and forced off their land and moved to other states.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the late 1780’s the US began urging the Cherokees to stop hunting and their traditional ways of life and to instead learn about how to live, farm, and worship like Christian Americans. Despite everything the white people in Georgia and other southern states that abutted the Cherokee Nation refused to accept the Cherokee people as social equals and urged their political representatives to take the Cherokees land. The purchase of the Louisiana Territory from France in 1803 gave Thomas Jefferson the chance to relocate the eastern tribes beyond the Mississippi River.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were some reasons why the Cherokees moved in the first place. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 justified because the Indians did things that are very uncalled for. They did things like, scalping men, women, and children alive. and They also burned them on stakes. Also the Cherokees agree to move because they signed a treaty that if they sign it they agreed to move. Plus when they move they get to receive five million dollars and they also get a lot of land. So the Cherokees agree to move and get land and five million dollars and the Americans don’t want to die.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cherokee was the last to move and one reason they didn’t want to leave is because the other tribes that went to the Indian territory got their horses taken and people died from diseases. The place had a lot of land for the people probably because everyone who lived there moved because of thieves. In the eyes of the Americans, the Indians should be thankful that we even gave them land. In the Indians eyes again, why kick us out and give us junk land because we won’t want to move.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many events that led up to the removal of the Eastern Cherokee in the early-to-mid 19th century. However, it all really begins in 1830. Major Ridge was discussing treaties regarding selling land to the U.S. Government. The Cherokee believed that lived in their own sanctuary, their paradise, and that their ancestors had always lived here. Major Ridge felt if he could die to preserve his people land’s he would gladly do so. The Cherokee picked the wrong side during the American Revolution which caused American soldiers to desecrate Cherokee lands. He did not wish that same tragedy amongst his people. President Jefferson believed that eventually through cultural assimilation the Indian people and Americans would become one and we would…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indian Removal Policy

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There were several moral aspects of moving the Indians that were brought up during this time. The Secretary of War, William H. Crawford, said, “Intrusions upon the lands of the friendly Indian tribes, is not only a violation of the laws, but in direct opposition to the policy of government towards its savage neighbors…” while he was talking to some military commanders (Document G). He was trying to get the point across that it was morally wrong to remove the Indians from the lands that they have lived on for so long, especially since they had not done anything to justify the actions that the American Government were attempting to take against them. There was a collection of photographs from the Georgia Historical Society that contained a picture of the Vann House, built by James Vann who was a Cherokee leader of mixed blood. His estate was beautiful and very well built. It showed the intelligence of the Indians and that they were not all primitive like some would believe (Document L).…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 1800s, White settlements were expanding westward. This threatened the Cherokee land which was located in the Southeastern part of the United States. This left the Cherokee with a big decision to make for their entire tribe. Would they relocate West ,or stay for the White settlements to invade where they call home. After all, the Cherokee had owned the land for over 10,000 years. It was not the United States’ land to take. This is why many of the Cherokee Nation felt the need to stay. Others wanted to move because they felt that if they did not, then the United States territory would override the Cherokee customs and they would have to follow United States laws. Clearly the best chance of survival for the Cherokee was to stay in…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The great Cherokee Nation that had fought the young Andrew Jackson back in 1788 now faced an even more powerful and determined man who was intent on taking their land. But where in the past they had resorted to guns, tomahawks, and scalping knives, now they chose to challenge him in a court of law. They were not called a 'civilized nation' for nothing. Many of their leaders were well educated; many more could read and write; they had their own written language, thanks to Sequoyah, a constitution, schools, and their own newspaper. And they had adopted many skills of the white man to improve their living conditions. Why should they be expelled from their lands when they no longer threatened white settlements and could compete with them on many levels? They intended to fight their ouster, and they figured they had many ways to do it. As a last resort they planned to bring suit before the Supreme Court. Prior to that action, they sent a delegation to Washington to plead their cause. They petitioned Congress to protect them against the unjust laws of Georgia that had decreed that they were subject to its sovereignty and under its complete jurisdiction. They even approached the President, but he curtly informed them that there was nothing he could do in their quarrel with the state, a statement that shocked and amazed them.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My first reason is that indians should get there back First reason is because Native Americans…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the document it writes, “When the white man came to the shores of America, they found our ancestors in peaceful possession of this land.” and “You will slow down or even stop our progress in becoming civilized and in learning the christian religion.” The Cherokee owned thisland long before the white men had and felt as if they should not have to give it up. If the Cherokee were removed they would lose most of their progress. The Cherokee deserve to keep the land because they have lived there for their entire lives, and were trying to fit in with white…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Native American Poverty

    • 2659 Words
    • 11 Pages

    comeback. Much of this determination in from anger, so much has been taken from them that their angry emotions towards the non-Native Americans is quite understandable. Land has been taken from the Native Americans, they have been forced to relocate several times. While relocating their economic resources are taken from them and they are not given any chance to provide for themselves. The reservations in which the Native Americans are…

    • 2659 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays