THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard before the Court upon the Wife’s Complaint for Divorce, and the Husband’s Counter Complaint for Divorce, and the Court having scheduled a Final Hearing for June 17, 2012, and the parties and their respective counsel having appeared before the Court on said date, and the parties having established residency during the Final Hearing, and the Court being otherwise fully advised the premises finds that:…
This civil court case takes place in a West Virginia school system located in Taylor County, when a general education high school history teacher failed to follow an IEP for Douglas Devart. During the case Devart and his parents Robert and Virginia ended up using aliases by the names of John Doe, Jane Doe and son D.D. Doe as a deterrent from the public so the family would not endure any additional embarrassment, slander, and/or liable regarding the son’s handicap. The defendants of this case were D.D.’s history teacher Michael Withers, Principal Greg Cartwright, Superintendent Wendell Teets and the Taylor County Board of Education. The following is a sequence of events that happened in chronological order that led up to the trial. Plaintiff D. D. was diagnosed as having a learning disability in the fourth grade while attending Anna Jarvis School in Taylor County. At that time he had been put on an Individual Educational Program (a.k.a. IEP) designed to accommodate his learning disability as required by Public Law 94-142 and implementing federal regulations, 34 C.F.R. 300.130 and implementing State Policy No. 2419, Section 1.3, 1.4 and 2.11, because of his learning disability D.D.’s educational program was adapted to provide oral testing by a learning disabilities teacher in a learning disabilities resource classroom. This accommodation was regularly provided at Anna Jarvis School and Grafton Middle School.…
FACTS: The parties were married on March 1, 1959. Plaintiff had a 15 year old daughter by a previous marriage. It was planned that she would live with them, as well as agreed upon that after marriage the defendant’s mother from Hungary would be moved in with them (September 11, 1964). Defendant testified that he would not have married plaintiff if his mother could not live with them. Within a very short time after the arrival of the mother-in-law, the incompatibility between her and the plaintiff caused a disintegration of the marriage. After a psychologist and counselor were called upon, the plaintiff gave the defendant an ultimatum of living with her or his mother and the defendant chose his mother. Plaintiff moved out with daughters on July 9, 1965. Both plaintiff and defendant said they would take the other back upon submission of the other’s stance. Plaintiff sued her husband for maintenance and support for herself and the infant child of their marriage. The Chancery Division entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed.…
3. Brian Doyle, Irreconcilable Dissonance 308 – 311. Many couples are getting a divorce these days. There are many dramatic reasons to why a people get divorced. Individual’s might be married for years and in a blink of an eye in can all be gone, just from the spouse calling it quits. The author is telling the reader that marriages no longer hold a true meaning, divorces are so common now and people are using bizarre excuses to get out of a committed relationship.…
The marriage between Palmer and Palmer was dissolved on November 9, 2004. Included in the Decree was the husband’s obligation to pay spousal maintenance in…
At first, the marriage began horribly and seemed like a mistake to both of them at the time, the local authorities made…
Mr. Potbelly holds a garage sale at his home. Mr. Slim Jim stops by the sale and upon noticing a rare piece of art pottery offers a price of $100 for the art that is marked $250. Mr. Potbelly accepts Mr. Slim Jim’s offer. Mr. Potbelly informs Mr. Slim Jim he is selling his home because he is moving up north because he has lost his job. Mr. Slim Jim asks how much he is selling it for and Mr. Potbelly informs him he is thinking $75,000. Mr. Slim Jim offers him $70,000 cash for the property which Mr. Potbelly immediately accepts the offer. Mr. Slim Jim informs Mr. Potbelly that he will be back in one hour with a cashiers’ check made payable to Mr. Potbelly. Mr. Potbelly says “Great!” and that while Mr. Slim Jim is getting the money that he will find a box in his basement for the pottery.…
. "Community Legal Education Ontario." Separation and Divorce or Death of a Spouse: Property Division . N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Jan 2013. .…
The assumption standard does not meet modern pleading standards because it allows plaintiffs to present a claim that is missing an essential element of due process. An initial question is what are modern pleading standards? Pleadings standard in the modern era have become stricter and require plaintiffs to show more than they might have in the past. In two cases, Ashcroft v. Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly , the Supreme Court expanded the scope of pleading requirements. The Supreme Court held that “[t]o survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to “state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” The Court went on to state “[a] claim has facial plausibility when…
WHEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing premises and the other stipulations hereinafter appearing, the parties hereto have agreed to undertake their respective responsibilities, as follows:…
Palmore v. Sidoti, 466 U.S. 429, 104 S. Ct. 1879, 80 L. Ed. 2d 421 (1984)…
This case of U.S government versus defendant McClatchey involves hospital CEO, two physicians, and Mr. McClatchy who is a part of the administrative staff at Baptist Medical center. Two physicians involved in the case worked together in a group practice called BVMG that provided care to the nursing homes. In 1984, they brought a proposal to the Baptist Medical Center to have them buy the practice and in return physicians were to refer their patients from other hospitals to Baptist medical center. This proposal was rejected; however, some negotiation of this plan took place and Baptist medical center agreed to pay a fee of 75,000 dollars to each doctor for providing some services to the medical center. The doctors and the medical center stayed in contract until 1993 and it was told in the testimony that contract was still kept even after learning that the doctors were not providing the services that they promised to provide in that contract.…
On September 11th,2012 Alexandra Anderson made an appointment for September 15th, 2012 with the Apple Genius Bar at their Woodland Hills location in Tulsa, Oklahoma.…
Comes the Plaintiff Dale M. Roehnig, a minor, resident of Davidson County, Nashville, Tennessee, sues the Defendant Herman A. Schulman, a resident of Davidson County, Nashville, Tennessee, in a cause of action for damages in the sum of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) and for cause of action would show:…
day in order to satisfy the Court that the marriage has broken down irretrievably. If there…