Preview

Justifying Shareholder Wealth Maximisation

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4976 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Justifying Shareholder Wealth Maximisation
JUSTIFYING SHAREHOLDER
WEALTH MAXIMISATION
Alan D Morrison
Programme Director, The Oxford Finance Programme for Senior Executives; Professor of Finance, Saïd Business School
CORPORATE OBJECTIVES AND
CORPORATE FINANCE
The Role of the Corporation
Corporate fi nance is the branch of economics that concerns itself with the ways in which corporations fi nance their activities. If we want to think clearly about this topic, we need a simple model of the corporation. Figure 1 is about the simplest I can come up with.
Corporations require fi nancial capital, and this comes from investors. They contract with suppliers to get the raw materials that they need, and they contract with their workforce to do things with the raw materials that generate value. They sell their output to customers, which generates more cash. Some of the cash is needed to pay their suppliers and their workforce, and the remainder fl ows back to the investors. INTRODUCTION
How should we think about corporations?
Management theorists have come up with a number of answers. Many see organisations in organic terms, drawing upon similar conceptualisations of society which date back at least to Plato’s writings, and which are developed by modern sociologists such as Auguste Comte, Herbert Spencer, and
Emile Durkheim. A related vision is one of an organisation as a cultural entity, with its own personality and ways of doing things. Marxist thinkers have viewed organisations as mechanisms for sustaining the cultural hegemony of the ‘Boss Class’, which uses them to extract surplus value from the proletariat. And post-modernists reject grand unifi ed theories of this type, and see organisations as refl ecting the power relations that underpin a socially constructed reality.
Economists, and fi nancial economists in particular, tend to approach this question from a different angle. Finance and economics rely upon a number of assumptions about corporations, the role



References: Buchanan, J. M., Tullock, G., 1962. The Calculus of Consent De Soto, H., 2000. The Mystery of Capital. Morrison, A. D., Wilhelm, Jr., W. J., 2007. North, D. C., Thomas, R. P., 1973. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To put it simply, in financial terms, to maximize shareholders wealth means to maximize purchasing power. Throughout the years, we have learned that markets are most efficient when the company is able to maximize at the current share price. Every company’s main goal should be to strive to maximize its value to every single one of their shareholders. Common stock represents the value of the market price, and it also gives the shareholder an idea of the different investment, financing, and dividend decisions made by that particular firm.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fi 515 Week 1

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The corporation’s primary goal is stockholder wealth maximization, which translates to maximizing the price of the firm’s common stock.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    B. Explain why a firm should maximize shareholder wealth instead of profit or market share.…

    • 4453 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Questions on Finance

    • 2776 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Shareholder wealth is represented by the market price of a firm’s common stock. It is measured by the market value of the shareholders’ common stock holdings…

    • 2776 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Warren Buffett, known in the financial world as the "Oracle of Omaha", has reached the summit of business excellence and has become the most judicious financial investor and is admired the world over. Warren Buffett is an investor's icon with a magnificent ability to select companies that will yield great profit year after year.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Managers are hired to act on behalf of the shareholders of a firm. However, this is not always the case as both parties have different objectives. The difference in interests between shareholders and managers ‘derives from the separation of ownership and control in a corporation’ (Berk and DeMarzo, 2011: 921). Whereas shareholders are interested in maximising their own wealth, managers may have more personal interests which differ to that of the shareholders. Downs and Monsen (no date, cited in Chin, Cooley and Monsen, 1968:435) suggest that managers self-interest lies in maximising their life-time income and that ‘such self-interest will be congruent with profit maximisation for the firm only in special cases’. This conflict between both the shareholders and the managers is termed the agency problem. Alongside the agency problem comes agency costs, which is the costs incurred to prevent the managers from prioritising their interests over the shareholders. It can be argued that the extent to which managers will have discretion to pursue actions that are not consistent with shareholder wealth maximization is severely limited. However, this is not always the case.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Agency Cost

    • 4746 Words
    • 19 Pages

    optimal size of the firm and the payment of cash to shareholders. These conflicts are especially…

    • 4746 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The goal of countless corporations around the world is to create value for their shareholders in the most profitable ways possible. In this article, Rappaport put together some familiar business wisdom to present ten simple principles to help company to create the most effective shareholder value.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Basically this discussion gave us some information about the different forms of business, stakeholders and shareholders. They informed us that which one’s are more beneficial. Shareholders are basically the owners of the business or a company and shareholders are the ones who works for a business like managers. Hayne Leland and David Vogel were on the side of shareholders and Earnest dalbo and Rich Lyons were on the side of stakeholders. They had an argument about which parties are more important and why one party should placed into consideration more that the other party.…

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shareholder wealth-maximazation model goals to maximize the present value of the expected future cash flow for the equity owner’s (shareholder). It is the long term business goal and the value for the firm is determined by the amount, timing, and risk of the firm’s expected future profits. For the following events, the value of the firm is :…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law -Shareholders Rights

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Majority shareholders own more than half of outstanding shares in the company whilst minority shareholders own less than 50% of the share capital. Majority shareholders are usually also the directors of the company. They in effect control the operations of the company and their actions may be to their benefit. The law therefore, in light of this possibility provides various legal remedies available to the minority shareholder.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    and fraud. In this study, these traditional measures of governance are found to have little impact.…

    • 14387 Words
    • 126 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lecturer responsible for AUE2602: Topic 1: Corporate Governance Ms Nicolene Coetzee Contact details: AUE2602@unisa.ac.za CORPORATE GOVERNANCE What does CORPORATE GOVERNANCE mean: It is the system or process whereby companies are directed or controlled. It follows then that: Healthy, honest, open, competent and responsibly controlled companies will improve the quality of modern society.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Managers as agents are especially bound by them: therefore, the term agent morality. Although we ground our arguments in an analysis of the moral foundations of economics and business, the principles that we show to be binding on managers are already commonly understood and agreed to by many U.S. citizens. This view might therefore prove to be persuasive in the U.S. business context. SHOULD MANAGERS MAXIMIZE SHAREHOLDER WEALTH? The Principal-Agent Model of the Firm Business academicians and writers in the business press routinely advise senior managers of publicly owned U.S. corporations to follow a principle that ought to guide management actions: carry out only those policies that increase the net present value (NPV) of the firm (see, e.g., Drucker, 1984; Jensen, 1991). These advisors assume that managers of firms are agents of shareholders, who create firms (or invest in them) so as to increase their wealth relative to that provided by other available investment opportunities: Why otherwise would shareholders bother to invest money in firms? Creation or investment for the end of wealth implies that owners expect those who are hired to run firms will work toward achieving the end - almost always wealth - for which firms are established. From the expectation of owners of firms comes the obligation of employees and senior managers. (See Arnold, 1987, for a functionalist desert theory of profits.) The duty of an individual to honor his or her agreements provides a justification, therefore, for the moral obligation of a manager to his or her shareholders.…

    • 10147 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Powerful Essays