Preview

Jury Nullification Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
738 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jury Nullification Research Paper
Jury Nullification Paper
Will Rosales
CJA/344
April 30, 2014
Timothy Hall
Jury Nullification Paper
In our society, ethnicity does have major effects on our judicial practices and courtroom proceedings do to The Sentencing Project research. It has also affected several different places where we live. For example, Poverty stricken areas has more of a possibility to experience much more crime than a place that is more fruitful employment and has maintained wealth. The issues with both class and race are more likely to impact on the likelihood of involvement with the treatment within the system and the criminal justice system. As long as society keeps racial tension in existence within the court system it will always exist. There could be some ways to stop it; one is by educating anyone involved in the criminal justice career especially our police. There are many …show more content…
Each argument has a great amount of strong facts and opinions to support them as well as multiple of reasons. After thorough research to my belief about race based jury nullification should not be should not be conducted by jurors. As a whole we are not opposed to jury nullification, but when race is a factor we are opposed to nullification. By any means community unity is not promoted by race based jury nullification. Simply this thought process is based on discrimination and simply racial; as a society we are trying to help educate and show everyone how any racial based ideas can be very negative. It does not mean that races should not promote what they stand for and should not be proud of who they are, but when a jury finds a defendant innocent and/or guilty because of race alone is a major problem. What jurors need to base his or her verdicts is on information, facts, and evidence presented to them throughout a trial; not on racial biased opinions that need to be left
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Jury Nullification
    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Jury Nullification

    A situation that gives the jury a judgment of nonguilty is known as jury nullification. These situations involve a defendant who has evidence against him or her proving him or her guilty for the alleged offenses for various reasons. This occurs when the evidence is enough to incarcerate a victim but the jury feels confident that conviction is a form of injustice shown toward the accused. In this paper the subject to examine is jury nullification as well as the opinoins of it more closely. The main factor considered in jury nullification is race when it refers to the defendant; the ruling of the defendant is considered unjust. People think that jurors should take this into consideration when dealing with situations in which the defendant is a minority and will be automatically mistreated by the law; this is the most important factor to consider when bringing oneness in the court systems of America. They believe that jury nullification surrounding race is the primary way to promote change and lower the level of racial discrimination in the law courts of American. The judge should give his judgment based on the facts presented not racial injustices and equalities; he should use wisdom as well as experience.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Racial Disparity in Sentencing
    • 2143 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Racial Disparity in Sentencing

    The reason behind why racial disparity continues to grow is for four reasons. The four reasons would be prosecutorial discretion, ineffective assistance by attorney’s and procedural bar, venue and jury selection, and racism by the jurors. In the case of prosecutorial discretion the comparison of white-collar crime and street crime will show the discretion. The sentence in a white-collar crime case is less than the sentence in a street crime. An example would be that if individual’s cheats on his or her taxes no time will be spent behind bars. Cheating on taxes is usually in the hand of the Internal Revenue Service. On the other hand if an individual is caught with a small…

    • 2143 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Jim Crow
    • 2047 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Jim Crow

    In the book “The New Jim Crow” author Michelle Alexander talks about numerous issues of racial inequality in our criminal justice system. Alexander’s book is something every person who even has an interest in the criminal justice field should read, as it really looks beyond the color of a person’s skin. Alexander points out the vast majority of the problems our criminal justice system faces in racial inequality and discrimination. These problems have really formed our country to what it is to this day. Most people feel that society as a whole is past discrimination and that it is no longer a problem anymore. In reality, it is still a major problem in many aspects of our criminal justice system as well as the everyday lives of Americans. In all honesty I was one of them, but “The New Jim Crow” really opened my eyes on the discrimination that occurs within minorities in the United States. Reflecting back on this issue I had realized that I have witnessed this first hand with one of my close friends who is an African American male. I will get into more detail about this later on in my paper, but for now I am going to address some of the issues of racial inequality in the criminal justice system that Alexander mentioned.…

    • 2047 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling In The Criminal Justice System
    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Racial Profiling In The Criminal Justice System

    In American life race has played and will continue to be an important role in the criminal justice system. For several years the criminal system has failed to maintain “justice” and will conclude to an answer depending on the victim’s profile. Many cases are taken to court but surprisingly lots of them don’t win or aren’t able to achieve justice for the reason that everything falls in the same category which is depending on the victims profile. Statistics have shown that the number of African Americans in prison is higher than Whites meaning that eventually race can determine who goes to jail. Most cases aren’t resolved with an actual justification which leads to incarcerate the wrong victim who then has his live ruined because an unfair move…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Jury Trial Analysis Paper
    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jury Trial Analysis Paper

    In this paper I will provide an analysis of a jury trial; my analysis will focus on the right of the defendant. I will articulate how a defendant 's rights at trial can be assured when it comes to The defendant’s right to a speedy trial, the defendant’s right to an impartial judge and the defendant’s right to an impartial jury.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Race-Based Theory In Criminal Justice
    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page

    Race-Based Theory In Criminal Justice

    Race-based theory plays a major role in predicting substantial and institutionalized discrimination that is always aimed at minorities within the systems of criminal justice. Racial discrimination in the criminal systems is mainly carried out by police, judges in the courts and agencies which carry out corrections in the United States. Evidence of criminal discrimination against African Americans and Hispanics found in the United States highlights some of the discrimination incidences that the minorities go through. Discrimination against minorities is popularly explained as a purpose of little position of their socioeconomic actions rather than indigenous or racial status. There are two race-based conflict theories which address the discrimination…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Racial Disparity in Sentencing
    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Racial Disparity in Sentencing

    The intersection of racial dynamics with the criminal justice system is one of longstanding duration. In earlier times, courtrooms in many jurisdictions were comprised of all white decision-makers. Today, there is more diversity of leadership in the court system, but race still plays a critical role in many criminal justice outcomes. This ranges from disparate traffic stops because of racial profiling to imposition of the death penalty based on the race of the victim or the offender. A particularly important aspect of the role of race in the criminal justice system relates to sentencing because the prospect of a racially discriminatory process violates the ideals of equal treatment under law under which the system is premised (The Sentencing Project [], 2004, p. 1).…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ethnicity and Crime: A Sociological Explanation
    • 804 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ethnicity and Crime: A Sociological Explanation

    According to official statistics, there are significant ethnic differences in the likelihood of being involved in the criminal justice system. Specifically, black people are over-represented in the system. In this essay I will talk about the reasons for these differences.…

    • 804 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Race-Based Jury Nullification
    • 2047 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Race-Based Jury Nullification

    Opponents of race-based jury nullification believe that a jury should defend the laws of the country and base their decisions on the facts of the case. These people believe juries should not consider a person’s race or express opposition of laws in this manner. Some of these people believe that this process may allow dangerous criminals back into society with no repercussions for their actions. People who oppose race-based jury nullification believe that a person’s sentiments should not become a factor when making a decision about a case.…

    • 2047 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Jury Nullification
    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jury Nullification

    A jury is most likely to acquit a defendant when members of the jury are sympathetic toward the defendant or disfavor the law under which the charges fall. Cases continue to exist, however, in which a juror's desire not to convict is for racial reasons. Some argue that after a long history of all White juries acquitting defendants who committed crimes against African Americans –and in a system in which African Americans have a higher likelihood of arrest and conviction –jury nullification can be a political tool in the face of a discriminatory process.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Racial Disparities in the American Criminal Justice System:
    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Racial Disparities in the American Criminal Justice System:

    Some of the greatest racial disparities in rates of incarceration occur in states in which minorities are concentrated in urban areas, which tend to have both higher rates of crime and greater law enforcement activity. An analysis utilizing quantitative data will demonstrate that racial disparities exist in the American Criminal Justice System.…

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Against Jury Nullification
    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Against Jury Nullification

    Clearly there is a place for jury nullification in the US. There has been a long history of unfair laws and practices in the country and allowing the jury the power to overturn or nullify them is a good way to keep the government in check. (Jones, 2004), but many still are against the concept. The real question is more about race-based nullification. Should race be a factor when juries consider nullification as an option? The answer to this is complicated if a jury really feels that a defendant was targeted unfairly based on race shouldn't they have some power to affect the trial. (Butler, 1995) Also without a complete revamping of the legal system how would one go about fixing the problem? Can nullification be eliminated with our current system, probably not. Law makers and groups who are against this feel that the concept is no longer being used for what it was originally intended for and there are individuals that are guilty who are being set free back into our communities.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Paul Butler, Racially-Based Jury Nullification Summary
    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Paul Butler, Racially-Based Jury Nullification Summary

    In 1995, professor and prosecutor Paul Butler made a proactive proposal in the Yale Law Journal. Just months after O.J Simpson was acquitted of a double murder, Butler, an African-American, proposed that African-American jurors across the country should engage in the practice of jury nullification. The article is titled “Paul Butler, Racially-Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Criminal Justice System, 105 Yale L.J. 677 (1995)”. In this article, I will use an expository and persuasive approach to summarize Butler's approach towards nullification. I further argue that Butler's argument is a valid tool to use when working to change the treatment of discrimination in the criminal justice system. I will also provide strong arguments discussing the problematic issues of returning offenders back into the community.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury Nullification Research Paper
    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury Nullification Research Paper

    Jury Nullification CJA 344 October 6, 2014 Johnny Cotton Jury nullification is defined as when juries believe a case is unjust or wrong and may set free a defendant who violated the law. Jury nullification has been an option of a jury in the United States. In the legal system that we use today, jurors have the power to give a non-guilty verdict even when the evidence clearly shows that the defendant is guilty. In cases like this, the jurors decide that the certain laws should not be applied to the particular case or that the laws are unjust for the case. In other cases the jurors may believe that the laws are certainly bias against the defendant to begin with. The 14th amendment in our Constitution promises that all persons no matter race,…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Jury Nullification
    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page

    Arguments Against Jury Nullification

    Just like how police officers and prosecutors can make discretionary decision; Jury nullification is simply a power granted to jury to make discretion regarding whether criminal punishment is appropriate in a given case. Just as police and prosecutors take into consideration as whether the defendant’s behavior was a technical violation or whether other circumstances not recognized by the law justified or excused a defendant’s actions; it serves jury nullification to get rid of inappropriate prosecutions where police and prosecutors failed to do so. So when critics criticize jury nullification without knowing that similar judgments are being made by police officers and prospectors, people who have such bias view don't even realize their argument…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics