Preview

Jury Nullification

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1461 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jury Nullification
JURY NULLIFICATION

Jury Nullification Paper
University of Phoenix Theresa Weekly December 5, 2010

Introduction
Jury nullification is the act of a jury in exonerating a defendant, even though they are truly guilty of violating the law. When this happens, the defendant is found innocent, even though without an act of jury nullification they would have been found guilty. Normally, jury nullification is carried out by a jury that disagrees with a law; this is a way of indicating their disagreement with the law, and their choice not to penalize the person who broke that law. Jury nullification is a significant tool that citizens use to make their outlook on the law clear, and over time the consequence of this action can have a profound effect on the ways that laws are formed and instituted.

Jury Nullification
Arguments for Race-Based Jury Nullification A jury is most likely to acquit a defendant when members of the jury are sympathetic toward the defendant or disfavor the law under which the charges fall. Cases continue to exist, however, in which a juror's desire not to convict is for racial reasons. Some argue that after a long history of all White juries acquitting defendants who committed crimes against African Americans –and in a system in which African Americans have a higher likelihood of arrest and conviction –jury nullification can be a political tool in the face of a discriminatory process.
As lawyer and former Democratic National Committee Chairperson Paul Butler claimed, "The race of a black defendant is sometimes a legally and morally appropriate factor for jury nullification" (Yale Law Journal, 1995, p. 6). After all, juries bravely used this right to block the prosecutions of individuals who resisted the Fugitive Slave Act (King, 2006). Butler



References: Butler, P. (1995). Racially-based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Criminal Justice System. Yale Law Journal. Retrieved December 1, 2010 from: http://www.questia.com/ King, N. (2006). Jury Nullification Is Unfair. Racial Profiling. Retrieved December 2, 2010 from Apollo Library, Opposing Viewpoints Database. Cato. (1999). Jurors should know their rights. Retrieved on December 1, 2010 from http://www.cato.org/pubs/policy_report/v21n1/jury.html Bryjack, G. (2009). Jury Nullification. Adirondack Daily Enterprise. Retrieved December 1, 2010 from http://www.adirondackdailyenterprise.com Lal, P. (2010, September 9). The case for race-based jury nullification. Retrieved from http://humanrights.change.org/blog/view/the_case_for_race-based_jury_nullification

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The inadequacies of our government and our judicial system have long been a subject for debate, and now many are debating why unanimous jury verdicts are required in criminal trials. In United States v. Lopez they say:…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the sole dissent of the Plessey v. Ferguson case, Justice Harlan proclaimed that “[o]ur Constitution in color-blind and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens” (Linder, 2016). Yet trials in America have long included conversations about race, such as with the infamous O. J. Simpson trial. Legal distinctions based on race are also frequently made, such as is done when considering college admission. These conversations and distinctions are allowed because in reality, neither the Constitution nor the American justice system are truly color-blind. Nor should they be; a color-conscious Constitution and justice system allow America an attempt to make up for past sins, such as the ruling of Plessey v. Ferguson.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Currently, in the United States legal system, criminal procedure puts the burden of proof on the prosecution. That is, it is up to the prosecution to prove that the defendant is guilty beyond any reasonable doubt, as opposed to having the defense prove that s/he is innocent. The term beyond reasonable doubt implies to the jury as individuals as well as the whole. By not considering all jurors in the decision, the United States legal system is being undermined.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decision Making of Juries

    • 4552 Words
    • 19 Pages

    In an ideal world, a jury would be made up of unbiased and unprejudiced people, intelligent enough to comprehend the evidence and with the necessary verbal and social skills to contribute to discussion. In the real world however, research has shown that jury verdicts are influenced by irrelevant aspects of the defendant such as their physical attractiveness, gender, race and even their accent.…

    • 4552 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict that is the opposite of what the jury believes or the verdict it was instructed to return by the court” (Rottenstein Law Group, 2014). In the course of a regular criminal trial, the judge will hand down some directives to the jury. The judge will inform the jury that they should set aside any feelings that they may take personal and achieve a decision exclusively in light of the truth displayed at trial. However, juries overlook these directions and clear criminals who plainly disobeyed the law. Current lawful guidelines firmly disapproval jury nullification and restrict encouragements for a jury panel to nullify the law. Therefore, a legal counselor may not, even with the within the…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Decision Making Essay

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It was found that jurors with previous experience of jury work were more likely to convict. This could be due to experience as well as the young jurors would be naïve and easily influenced by other factors. Also, the race of a juror was found to be a factor that could influence the decision made as they would be most likely convict defendants of a different race due to their prejudice against certain traits. Jurors with authoritarian personalities are more likely to convict due to their support for convention, police authority and their dogmatic approach. They believe in structure, law and order…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil cases are legal dispute between two or more parties that begins when a party files a complaint about civil actions (United States Courts, 2017). The party filing the complaint will file a fee required by status and a plaintiff who is unable to pay the fee may file a request to proceed in forma pauperis (United States Courts, 2017). Seeking money to compensate for damages or asking the court to stop a conduct that is causing hard is a civil case. The actions for a civil case includes providing information to each other with witnesses, copies of documentation related to the cas, and preparing for a trial by requiring litigants to assemble evidence and call witnesses (United States Courts, 2017). Furthermore, witness is require to answer questions from lawyer under oath while court reporter produces word-for-word account called a transcript (United States Courts, 2017).…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with a jury is a collection of twelve randomly selected persons between the ages of 18 and 65 from the electoral roll. They are all registered voters and are resident citizens of the country who have resided therein for more than five years. The history behind the jury selection process is that the leaders of the country believed that it would be fairer to have serious matters of the court heard by the accused peers. When the selection process first began it only involved persons of a wealthier class that held title to property but that change to accommodate all citizens to break the barriers of cultural diversity. Now we have today an assortment of twelve persons from all avenues of life that can identify with the accused social ailments.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury selection is laid down in the Juries Act 1994. While it is proven that there are reasonable alternatives to a jury trial and that there is no doubt that jury trial is both time consuming and expensive when compared with trial by magistrates or by a judge alone, however the right to a jury trial shall not be dismissed so lightly. The anti jury lobby deems the jury system unpopular the importance of which is considered only overrated. I will be critically analysing whether trial by jury should be abolished in the UK legal system plus evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the system.…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the criminal justice system the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups. These groups include the police who investigate the crime and the district attorneys who prosecute the offenders. When there is a trial, a selective number of individuals are called before the court known as the jury. It is not only the right and duty of juries to judge the facts, but also what is the law. To ultimately determine a verdict, the jury must take all information into consideration plus the moral intent of the accused…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    12 Angry Men Analysis - 2

    • 2566 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Kaplan M., Jones & Christopher S., 2003 “The Effects of Racially Stereotypical Crimes on Juror Decision-Making and Information –Processing Strategies” in “Basic and Applied Social Psychology” pp. 1-13…

    • 2566 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson describes the jury as “the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.”( Dialogue on the American Jury: We The People in Action, 1) The purpose of juries is to ensure that no government is able to convict innocent people, or to give unreasonably cruel punishment. Although the juries we see today are very different from the first juries, they have always served the same purpose, to keep things fair for citizens.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abolition Of Jurys

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Jury system was first developed in England during the dark ages, around 800 years ago; back then the jurors had to investigate the case for themselves, however this is no longer the process. Due to the jury system being around for such a substantial amount of time, some may believe that it is working and is a good process when in the courts; however, others may think it’s time for a fundamental review. Juries only decide cases that are heard within the Crown Court, meaning that juries only decide the verdict on 1% of criminal cases, however, although 1% doesn’t seem like much, that still amounts to 30,000 trials. I will now go on to discuss the for and against the abolition of juries.…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It appears that these criticisms are mainly just “made by appeals to logic, experience and by anecdotes purporting to show jury incompetence or malfeasance.” This essay argues that the jury is an important and unique institution whose establishment is, and was, legitimate and should be preserved in legal systems…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being excluded from the civic process is a threat to democracy. Likewise, the practice of disenfranchisement is often unequal, leading to “racial vote dilution” and can be perceived as an unjust “collateral consequence” of a conviction.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays