There is no such thing as successful leader who is egotistic and oblivious. Julius Caesar was considered the most powerful man in all of Rome; he was also the most arrogant and unmindful leader in history. He thought he was immortal and that no man could effect or threaten him. Caesar boasted, “Danger knows full well that Caesar is more dangerous than he.” (II.ii.45-46) His enormous ego blinded him from all of the omens and threats against him. Caesar was completely oblivious to the conspirators planning to kill him. He noticed that Cassius looked like he was up to no good, but Caesar said “I fear him not yet if my name were liable to fear I do not know the man I should avoid.” (I.ii.208-210) Caesar is an unsuccessful leader because of his fatal flaws; he doesn’t care about his people’s concerns. Caesar claimed that he was “as constant as the North Star”. He blew off Metellus Cimber to claim that he couldn’t be easily persuaded. Even his wife thought he was arrogant! Calpurnia told Caesar “your wisdom is consumed in confidence.”(II.ii.53-54) Not only did his flaws diminish his power, they also ended up getting him killed.
Brutus was the only leader in the play who truly cared about the people of Rome. He was honorable, noble, and idealistic. The only way Cassius convinced Brutus to join the conspiracy was because he convinced him that he would be helping the people. Cassius even forged letters in the name of the people urging him to replace Caesar. He had no intention of killing his good friend, but agreed to do so because he thought Caesar would oppress the people. Brutus stated “ If it be aught the general good, set honor in one eye and death on the other and I will look differently.” (I.ii.93) Brutus wasn’t aware that everyone in Rome wasn’t as trustworthy as him. He was very idealistic, he trusted Mark Antony by letting him speak at Caesars funeral. He said, “ Mark Antony, here take you Caesar’s body… and speak all good you can devise of Caesar.” (III.i.269) He was very naïve and had no idea that by letting Antony speak, he would stir up munity against him. Brutus had great values and morals, but his honorability and idealistic nature made him a naïve and unsuccessful leader. He tried to make noble decisions, but often didn’t make the wise decisions. Even Mark Antony claimed “This was the noblest Roman of them all… he only acted in a general honest thought.” (IV.vi.75) Brutus was a great man, but his fatal flaws made him a naïve and unsuccessful leader. Cassius was an extremely intelligent and courageous. Cassius was very impulsive and acts on his emotions, this is his fatal flaw and these traits ultimately lead to his death. He was constantly putting his life on the line and threatening to kill himself. He was also very devoted to Brutus. When Cassius failed to give Brutus gold to pay his soldiers he cried, “I that denied the gold will give my heart. Strike as thow didst Caesar.” (IV.iii.115-116) He was very impulsive and always made decisions too quickly. In the beginning of the play, Cassius was very manipulative towards Brutus. However towards the conclusion of the novel, Cassius became tremendously dependent and attached to Brutus. He always gave in to him, and agreed with his decisions. When the two men were debating over what war tactics to use against Antony and Octavius, Brutus wanted to go down the mountain to fight. Cassius didn’t agree, but allowed Brutus take charge; he said “Then with your will, go on, well along us and meet them at Philippi.”(IV.iii.225) Cassius would be a marvelous leader if it weren’t for his flaws. By allowing Brutus to make all of the decisions, his leadership was cut off. He didn’t even have the ability to be a leader when he wasn’t the one making the decisions. Cassius was so quick and impulsive; he sometimes makes catastrophic choices. He even kills himself because he thought Antony’s troops had invaded their camps. He said “Here, take thou the hilts, and when my face is covered as tis now, Guide thou the sword.” (V.iii.45-48) If he had waited another five minutes before killing himself he would have realized that they won the battle. Cassius was a brave person, but an impulsive and weak leader.
Mark Antony was known in the beginning of the play as the "foolish" reveler who enjoys plays and masquerades. Antony was not taken seriously and he has a low rank in the senate. In Act 1 he was only known as an excellent friend to Caesar. Nobody thought of Antony is a threat. Brutus even decided not to kill him by saying "for he is well given to sports, to wildness and much company/ there is no fear in him" (II.i.188-189) Even Caesar wasn’t serious with Antony, he was surprised when Antony was up early and says "See! Antony, that revels long, a nights is not withstanding up." (II.ii.116-117). Antony had such a strong reputation for being a "party boy" that this flaw in his character ended up helping him gain power. Little did people realize that Antony was actually very manipulative and cunning. He convinced Brutus to let him speak at Caesar's funeral by pretending to be his friend. He easily changed the people’s point of view, and started a mutiny against the conspirators. His use of irony was very influential; he claims, " I am no orator, as Brutus is!" (III.ii.219). There was a major change in Antony after the death of Caesar. He used his reputation to his advantage and defeated the conspirators. Mark Antony was a great speaker and could control the people very well. Antony changed from a reveler to a victorious leader throughout the play.
In order to be a successful leader, it is imperative to master communicating and manipulating people. All people have flaws, and there is no such thing as a perfect leader. It is impossible to please everyone, and meet the needs of all people. Cassius, Brutus and Caesar allow their flaws to diminish their leadership. Antony is a successful leader because he is able to change throughout the course of the play.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Leaders are everywhere in our world. They constantly surround us and tell us what to do. Leaders have shaped our history and are constantly shaping our future. Some excellent examples of good leaders are Adolf Hitler and Julius Caesar. We might not agree with some of the policies that Hitler performed, however, we can conclude that his excellent leadership skills allowed him to effectively govern about 69 million citizens. Caesar’s quick and decisive personality granted Caesar the title, Dictator, of the Roman Empire. Under Caesar’s rule, the Roman Empire vastly expanded its borders through military annexations. But, with all things foretold, what designates someone the power to lead people? There are several factors that bring about a good leader. The three main factors incorporate communication, confidence, and commitment. Anybody that decides to encompass these factors, will not only be a good leader, but they will also be an effective and a revolutionary leader.…
- 600 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Which highlites that you need to be able to lead other people which highlites again, that you need to be born as an alpha, you need to be born in commanding other people around, you need to be born in leading people, and we can celearly se that with both of the leaders. Aswell Julius Caesar and clearly Napoleon. If we look at their battles. The battle of Austerlitz for napoleon. There is no need to give an example to see, that both of them are leaders, and not just with being popular, or advertising propaganda. They are just born as a leader, and everybody can copy eachother, but having the ability to copy a leader that well takes more than just copying it. Leadership doesn’t have anything to do with any other political idea of either propaganda nor popularity. It is something compleately differnet. As stated above it is the entrance to an entire different era, and if people are born with this capability and emulate eachother, this power can m anipulate people better than everything else, and we can clearly see that with Julius Ceasar and with Napopleon. How did leadership affect…
- 427 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Although research has shown that the presence of specific traits alone do not ensure successful leadership, it has been proven that successful historical leaders share certain key traits. According to Shelley Kirkpatrick and Edwin Locke, “leaders do not have to be great men or women by being intellectual geniuses or omniscient prophets to succeed, but they do need to have the "right stuff" and this stuff is not equally present in all people” .…
- 5470 Words
- 15 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Cicero, Roman Senator and Philosopher, set up specific qualities of an ideal Roman ruler. A clear role in what it takes to effectively lead. A leader must first lead a dignified life for them to lead a successful empire. Leaders must demonstrate a work ethic and ability to gain respect. With that respect, leaders must love and care for their subordinates to show their compassionate towards the Roman people. Leaders must then demonstrate ethics to provide plans that must be followed in order to bring success to their empire. Politically, Cicero’s ideals reflected on both Marcus Aurelius and Commodus in various distinct ways. Marcus Aurelius and Commodus were men that ruled the empire of Rome and their governance had a profound impact in the Roman history. However while Marcus Aurelius was a grown just, benevolent man who fought for the power of Rome and successfully won the battle, Commodus was young, ignorant, cruel ruler, who demanded respect soon after he took position as emperor, and seriously weakened Roman Empire.…
- 859 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Julius Caesar was a dictator of the Roman Empire. His rule was adored by nearly everyone, especially the poor and lower classes. Caesar fought in many battles, which gained him notoriety. One of the most famous battles is his battle against Pompey. Because of all his battles, he was the wealthiest man in Rome. The people’s love and admiration for Caesar only grew when he distributed out land to the poor. He battled by his soldier’s sides and reformed the Roman Empire. Julius Caesar’s leadership is something to be marveled at for his ability to set a standard that can be looked up to by others. Another leader, who is probably the most famous leader of our nation is George Washington. He was our nation’s first president and the leader of the continental army. In total George Washington fought in twenty-nine battles with his men. His men chose to follow him into battle and then chose him to be president because of his strong leadership skills. He was known as a “visionary leader” because he strived for his goals no matter how long they took to accomplish. If you were look at a list of his accomplishments it would be extensive and brilliant. He became an army general for the Continental Army, became the first two-term president, he created the first cabinet of the executive branch, and let’s not forget the Jay Treaty, the Treaty of Greenville, and the Pickney’s Treaty which all prompted peace and friendship. George Washington is known as the Father of this Country for a reason, that reason is his leadership skills and his visionary…
- 749 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Firstly, Julius Caesar can be considered as a great man because he was a charismatic…
- 2119 Words
- 23 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Outstanding leaders are often those who display distinguishing charactoristics of true statesmanship. They are not people who are arrogant enough to believe that they know everything about any one subject but instead, are humble and studious. Great leaders set clear cut and realistic goals. They are the kind of people who can see the big picture and scope out a path to get there, never waivering, with great confidence, they lead the way. They are not always the charming type but instead have a way about them of convincing others to join them or to understand their philosophy of the given situation. They are often likeable and seemingly outgoing. Usually great orators, however, not always the perfect writers, such as George Washington and not always with a loud enough voice, such as Patrick Henry.…
- 489 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In Julius Caesar, Brutus exemplifies the perfect leader role by listening and understanding Cassius with empathy. In Act one scene two , lines ninety-eight through one-hundred and thirty-nine .It shows Brutus listening carefully to Cassius and taking into considering Cassius’s plan to kill Caesar. It is important to listen carefully to all idea propositioned to you. Take Thomas Jefferson for an example, he had to listen to 54 other delegates ideas and opinions in regards to writing the Declaration of Independence. In addition to getting his own opinion across in a respectful manner. Being able to take a step back and listen is an important trait to have if you want to be a leader or even successful in life. Winston Churchill once said,” Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak;…
- 542 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
As Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius once suggested “Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth”; embodying the notion that conflicting perspectives are held by different people towards both events and individuals. I believe that this common idea is held true in William Shakespeare’s production ‘Julius Caesar’, discussing the conflict between Brutus, Cassius and Antony, Richard Glover’s Sydney Morning Herald article ‘Take a Moment to Mourn the Mainstream’, debating against the depreciation of the respect over radio stations between generations, and Frank Capra’s classic film ‘Mr. Smith Goes to Washington’, which expresses the triumph of American ideals through the conflicting morals of Senator Jefferson Smith and Joseph Paine. In each we see how the respective composers have used main protagonists as well as various literary and cinematic devices to express the theme of conflicting perspectives and influence the audience’s reception.…
- 1011 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
“The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” by Shakespeare, highlights the story of the popular figure of Rome namely Julius Caesar. It covers his return from the defeat against Pompeii till the time of his death. It also covers the fact that Caesar was betrayed and killed by his fellow comrades because he wanted all the power to himself. Of the comrades who committed the murder is his best friend, Brutus. Other comrades bought Brutus into this murder plot by sending him a letter pretending it was from the people, which the letter encouraged him to “Speak, Strike, and Redress”. However, another comrade named Marc Anthony did not buy into the plan, and the other comrades decides to kill him also. They plan to do so because they thought he stop them from…
- 1109 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
I believe that being a beloved leader has a huge effect on being a better ruler. In 44 B.C. Julius Caesar was assassinated by his senate chamber. Soon his nephew and adopted son, Gaius Octavian, would join forces with Mark Anthony and Marcus Aemilius Lepidus into a three-way dictatorship. This transformed Rome from being a Monarchy into being a dictatorship. Lepidus left Rome soon after Octavian began reign and went on to lead parts of Africa and Hispania. In 37 B.C. Mary Anthony met Cleopatra. They fell in love and Mark followed her back to Egypt. Octavian took reign over Rome and obtained the name Augustus Caesar. Mark Anthony and Augustus became enemies and war broke out between Rome and Egypt. This is one reason for why I believe that Augustus was such a beloved leader.…
- 972 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Yet I think his biggest flaw was his naiveté because Brutus was persuaded to do things with ease. He never thought that he could've been the one being deceived, which he was, and that the whole world was as noble and respectable as he was. It all stated when he was convinced to join Cassius and the conspirators to murder Caesar in the beginning of the play with the…
- 558 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Today, rulers of other countries still bear the title Caesar. This name has achieved an unprecedented amount of respect. Julius Caesar is one of Rome's most famous leaders, and he has come to deserve that fame. Julius has many of the discrete characteristics of a leader. He was egotistic (some may say an egomaniac), he had a controlling power, he was intelligent, and he was ambitious. Although his reign did not prove as beneficial to Rome as it did for him, he is still considered a great leader.…
- 1368 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Julius Caesar is a play with many central ideas, but one in particular stands out to its readers. Shakespeare shows in Julius Caesar that following people blindly can end in conflict through the plot.…
- 596 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Julius Caesar served as a key ruler in creating the Roman Empire. He is considered one of the world’s greatest generals and a wise politician. He took opportunities and used them to their fullest for self improvement. Characteristics such as confidence and charisma made Caesar a born leader. Over the course of his lifetime he flew through the political ladder in the Roman Republic and set forth a new way of ruling as a dictator.…
- 1298 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays