Preview

Judges Appointment Process

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
200 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Judges Appointment Process
The judges making these decisions are appointed by the federal government.
Individuals who apply for an appeal court position without any prior judicial experience, have their applications vetted by a screening committee composed of legal members, lay members and, more recently, a police officer. Candidates are evaluated on their professional qualifications
~including awareness of racial and gender issues! and personal characteristics and then “recommended” or “not recommended” to the Minister of Justice who retains full discretion to choose among candidates. The majority of candidates are promoted from a lower court and do not go through the committee process at this stage. However, the minister typically undertakes consultations with the legal community before promoting
…show more content…
Our earlier research on federal judicial appointments following the introduction of the screening committees shows that for the 1989 to 2003 time period 27 per cent of provincial appeal court appointees had “major” participation with the governing party that appointed them ~such as campaign organizing or close social ties to a cabinet minister!, and 15 per cent had more “minor” activities and associations ~political

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the state of Pennsylvania justices must meet the basic qualifications to serve on the bench that the state has in place (www.pacourts.us). These qualifications include, being a United States citizen and must have lived in the state for at least one year (www.pacourts.us). Each judicial must also meet the age requirement to serve as well. A judge cannot serve, if they are under the age of twenty one or older than seventy (www.pacourts.us). Each judicial must be a member of the Bar of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and also hold a strict standard of conduct (www.pacourts.us). Once these basic qualifications are met, they are then ready to hopefully be elected.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    State Judges Case Study

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The position is an appointed position and not an elected one like most state judges, said Ron Postell Grand Prairie city attorney. Arnold applied for the position and went through an interview. Tom Hart, Grand Prairie city manager, selected Arnold for the position. The city council then had to approve a two-year contract for the position.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oregon Judicial Selection

    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages

    There are also a few small tax courts and trial courts, but for this recommendation we want to focus on the three courts mentioned. Judiciary nonpartisan elections have been occurring in Oregon since 1931. Gubernatorial appointment is the method for filling interim vacancies within the courts. The governor makes the decision without senate approval with the exception in Circuit Court vacancies. The Oregon State Bar creates a preference poll in that circuit and information is then given to the Governor whom makes the final appointment. The appointed interim may run for retention election as an incumbent in the next general election.…

    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | Correct, "Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Objective: Examine the potential impact on judicial independence that results from the election of judges versus the appointment of judges.”…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role of the Supreme Court is to interpret the constitution and to apply these interpretations to legislation that has been made by Congress as to avoid them from making unconstitutional law. In doing so this is called judicial review in which the Supreme Court takes an active role in intervening in politics. If a law is suggested as being unconstitutional the Supreme Court will either accept or decline and if they accept, this will result in the judiciary then looking at the case and determining whether or not the accusation is true or if the question is entitled to make a claim. In some instances this can be taken too far by the court and they can intervene and end up making a substantial decision on some very controversial issues which would be deemed as unfair by one of the parties, other times their intervention is adequate and justified. I will argue that they are not politically neutral due to the appointment process; however I think they are less like politicians in disguise and more just actively doing their job and interpreting the constitution as how it is supposed to be.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Identify what you believe are the characteristics of a good judge, a good prosecutor, and a good defense attorney. How do these characteristics contribute to an effective court system?…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The probability of a case being appealed for each judge is given in column 5 of the table. Judges Winkler, Panioto and Grady have the lowest probability of appeal for Common Pleas, Domestic Relations and Municipal Courts respectively.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Assignment

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Johal, Johal, and Deo are the defendants in this case who are being charge with kidnapping with the intent to transport a person against his/her will. The defendants later extorted the victim and the victim’s family. The issue before the court today is whether the charge of kidnapping subsumes the charge of extortion or if the charge of extortion is an independent act from that of kidnapping.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The responsibilities of a judge in the criminal justice process consist of a variety of duties; no court judge have just one duty or job to complete on a daily bases. Some of these duties include determining probable cause, signing warrants, informing suspects of their rights, setting and revoking bail, arraigning defendants, and accepting guilty pleas. When a judge is not in court, most of the time, they are negotiating dispositions with prosecutors and defense attorneys. The most important responsibility is to ensure suspects and defendants are treated fairly in compliance with Due Process of Law. In a jury trial the judge is responsible for allowing the jury a fair chance to reach a verdict. Before releasing them to deliberate or discuss…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court System Interview

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Berman, M. (2014). Who is Ray Moore? The Judge at the Center of Alabama’s Muddled Gay Marriage Situation. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2015/02/09/who-is-roy-moore-the-judge-at-the-center-of-alabamas-muddled-gay-marriage-situation/…

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federal Judges are nominated by the president in accordance with Article II of the Constitution. The nominees are confirmed or denied by the checks and balances of the Senate. They also can be appointed through recommendations from the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, members of Congress, sitting judges and justices, and the American Bar Association. There is even a special nomination called a senatorial courtesy. This is when a state senator sends in a nomination to the president. All through rare, these special nominations almost always get approved (How Judges and Justices Are Chosen, n.d.). Federal Judges are nominated base usually on their ideologies and how they match up with the current presidential goals and vacancies that need to be filled.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Selection

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Every American that has registered to vote or has a drivers license can at any time be called to serve on a jury. There are mixed feelings about being called for duty. Some Americans see it as a nuisance that will disrupt their lives. Others see it as an opportunity to serve their country. Being called to serve, and actually serving is two different matters. A jury is ultimately selected by the judge, prosecutor and defending attorney. How they are they picked? How are they released? Maybe this paper will answer a few of these questions.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Selection

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In recent years judicial selection has become an issue of great debate with many different views and ways to make it better. In Texas, judicial selection is carried out by partisan elections where voters get to choose the judges and justices. This form of judicial selection has many advantages as well as some disadvantages.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When hearing a case in court both magistrates and judges have to be unbiased and have no prejudices. They both have to make sure that no party is treated unfairly. Not only that but both parties must have a good sense of judgement and must be able to make sound decisions.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays