Preview

Judical Selection Process in Pa and Arizona

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1011 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Judical Selection Process in Pa and Arizona
Pennsylvania and Arizona’s Judicial Selections

The United States has a unique court system. One of the elements that make it a unique system is the judicial selection process. The qualifications, method of selection and election and removal from the bench vary from state to state. The average person would believe there would be a Constitutional or statutory qualification to serve as a judge. This is not the case in the United States (Judicial Process in America 8th edition pg. 125 chapter 6). The states of Pennsylvania and Arizona have their own agenda when it comes to the judicial selection process. In the state of Pennsylvania justices must meet the basic qualifications to serve on the bench that the state has in place (www.pacourts.us). These qualifications include, being a United States citizen and must have lived in the state for at least one year (www.pacourts.us). Each judicial must also meet the age requirement to serve as well. A judge cannot serve, if they are under the age of twenty one or older than seventy (www.pacourts.us). Each judicial must be a member of the Bar of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and also hold a strict standard of conduct (www.pacourts.us). Once these basic qualifications are met, they are then ready to hopefully be elected. According to the judicial selection website, Pennsylvania does not use the Judicial Nominating Commissions as their method to selecting a justice to serve on the bench (www.judicialselctions.us). The justices run for election to gain a seat in the courts. They do this by campaigning and getting the necessary funds from donations and their political party. Elections in the state are held in odd numbered years. Once a justice is elected they can serve an unlimited amount of terms until the mandatory retirement age of seventy and are retained or re-elected by voters. Appellate Courts and Courts of Common Pleas judges serve ten year terms. All other court justices such as, Magisterial District and



References: Carp, Robert A., Ronald Stidham, and Kenneth L. Manning. "chapter 6." Judicial process in America. 8th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2011. 125. Print. "Judgepedia." Judgepedia. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Jan. 2013. <http://www.judgepedia.org>. "Judicial Selection in the States." Judicial Selection in the States. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Jan. 2013. <http://www.judicialselection.us>. cases, court, the most recent court news, and statistics.. " Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania." Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Jan. 2013. <http://www.pacourts.us>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    State Judges Case Study

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The position is an appointed position and not an elected one like most state judges, said Ron Postell Grand Prairie city attorney. Arnold applied for the position and went through an interview. Tom Hart, Grand Prairie city manager, selected Arnold for the position. The city council then had to approve a two-year contract for the position.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CJUS 330

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Judges: in state courts they are elected by the voters. Federal judges are nominated by the president. Judges are the ultimate authority figures in the courthouse. Only they can set bail, instruct jurors, and impose sentences.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oregon Judicial Selection

    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Herein, lies the first faultiness in Oregon’s judicial selection process. According to Oregon Secretary of State, approximately eighty five percent of recent Oregon judges have been appointed and less than twenty percent of Gubernatorial appointments are being contested. Since 1983, there have been only two judges that were defeated in contested elections. (Yamaka)…

    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Suffolk Superior Courthouse and Edward W. Brooke Courthouse provided two distinct views into the judicial system. At the Suffolk Superior Court the defendant, Donald Williams, was on trial on charges of assault with intent to murder and aggravated assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, both felonies. Contrastingly, I viewed a number of arraignments at the Edward W. Brooke Courthouse where, among the charges, were larceny and assault and battery on an officer, both felonies. The Suffolk Superior Courthouse, being a superior criminal court, dealt with more serious crimes than that of the Edward W. Brooke courthouse, a municipal court. In addition to the differing severity of the alleged crimes, there were also a number of glaring disparities between the two courthouses; namely buildings themselves, the conduct of the personnel, and procedures taken.…

    • 2548 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    State Courts are established by the Constitution and laws of each state. State court judges are selected in a variety of ways, including election, appointment for a given number of years, appointment for life, and combinations of these methods. The highest state court is often referred to as a Supreme Court. Some states also have an intermediate Court of Appeals. Below these appeals courts are the state trial courts. Some are referred to as Circuit or District Courts.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of the October 2004 term those current nine members had served together for eleven years, more than any other set of judges in U.S. history (Calabresi, Lindgren). Since there has been a lack of vacancies, few Presidents have been able to set the course of the courts by appointing like-minded judges; in years prior to 1970 judges were appointed roughly every two years. This undermines the efficiency of the democratic checks and balances. It also prevents the infusion of ideas that spring from the generational interest of the time. If every president was able to appoint a judge then it is highly probable there will be more cultural diversity on the court. There would be younger judges on the bench with a mindset more nearly reflective of the interests and issues of a newer generation.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Texas, all levels of Judges are elected to the individual court positions through a partisan ballot. Each candidate for…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think the Wyoming judicial selection procedure is less good when it comes to retention. I do think it is a good idea for the people to have a say in retention. However, as the data about Justice Voight proves, not many residents of Wyoming know who he is much less can evaluate the whether he has been doing a good job. I suspect the only reason he was voted for retention is people don’t like change.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Australian Government Policy

    • 4576 Words
    • 19 Pages

    While judges are government appointed, there is a tradition of judicial independence, and while public service…

    • 4576 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many justices are approaching an age at which they can retire, and the next justices elected to the supreme court will heavily influence the U.S. for years, possibly decades. The next justices will most likely be elected according to the next president's views. However, the president should elect justice who will be best for the country as a whole, not just according to their own views. The next president must be able to think about the entire nation when electing justices. They must show leadership by listening to others, and not just…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court of International Trade, Federal Claims, or the U.S. Supreme Court. In the case of Federal judges most are appointed by the president but must be confirmed by Senate vote. Appeals court judges can appoint federal bankruptcy judges. District judges can appoint federal magistrates and the qualification can vary on the partiality of the person reviewing nominees. In the constitution of the United States it models the process in confirming a federal judge it does not specify requirements for that position. Presidents and members of congress can acquire their own standards for federal judgeship. A candidate will go through extreme vetting by the D.O.J (Department of Justice) and the F.B.I (Federal Bureau of Investigation). These candidates with judicial experience are carefully examined. When coming into the federal judge ship the will examine such as their performance and the handling of cases, published writings, academic papers going as far back as college. The American bar Association also plays a role in the nominee as their integrity, competence, temperament and experience. This process is long road for federal judgeship the ABA (American Bar Association) will speak to about 40 of the nominee’s peers, judges that are familiar with nominee to see if they qualify and to attempt to attract the votes in his…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Federal Judges

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federal judges are appointed by the United States President and is confirmed by the Senate, including the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. The United States court system uses different kinds of judges for different purposes and at different levels including city, county, state, and federal. Most judges are usually elected moat the local level, however, federal judges are appointed. Federal judges have the authority and discretion over all the cases that are involved in federal law and the U.S. Constitution. At the moment there are currently 865 federal judges in the United States, who sit at different levels of the system. The American Bar Association, also known as, the ABA, maintains a list of candidates to be a federal judge. THe ABA…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges in the UK are often upper class, white men who have become judges through a good higher education and then a further training in judiciary. Currently, there are no black high court judges however the black population in prison is for ever growing. For the purpose of this essay, I shall be arguing that judges should be appointed based mostly on life experience and relativity. Of course a standard law degree and a solid understanding of the law is necessary but that goes without saying. However the extra qualities needed are arguable.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Justice

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As it is the president’s duty to select a candidate, there are certain qualities that the president searches for. The qualities that the president may search for include: ideological and policy preferences, judicial competence, political loyalty, and demographic factors. The president may choose nominees based on the views that the individual possess. This gives assurance to the president that both the White House and the Supreme court are heading in the same direction. Most presidents also have in interest in appointing candidates that are judicially competent. This allows for speeding along the confirmation process (Yolaf,246).…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Good Judge

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The most common form of judicial elections involves competitive elections of either a partisan or a non partisan nature.(Patterson 499) Just like in the merit plan, under which the governor appoints a judge from a short list of acceptable candidates provided by a judicial selection commission. The selected judge must then be reviewed periodically by the voters, who, rather than choosing between the…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays