John Searle Dualism
1. Compare and contrast the views of John Searle and Rene Descartes on dualism.
John Searle and Rene Descartes both had opinions on dualism. John believe different aspects like mental and physical both are one substance. Rene, on the other hand, believes two different substances like mental and physical are different things. Rene even talked about how thoughts and feelings that are nonmaterial exists in material place.
2. Compare and contrast the views of George Berkeley and Thomas Hobbes on the mind.
George and Thomas believed that they both have the mind pretty much figured out. George thought the mindset and ideas came from the world around us and what is real. Thomas believes that there are no ideas, and that the mind itself just is motioned …show more content…
Existentlism is just freedom. Humans are not physical things but outside determinism too.
10. Explain, compare, and contrast the views of Anselm and Gaunilo regarding the Ontological argument.
Anselm and Gaunilo has had views on ontological. Anselm if we believe there are two objects that are identical one isn’t perfect and the other is. Gaunilo believes that Anselm’s theory is redundant because two words that sound the same aren’t for example, Sail and sale. The argument can work if everything is in …show more content…
Explain and evaluate the views of Freud and Nietzsche, on the rationality of religious belief.
Freud and Nietzsche doesn’t believe there is a god. Nietzsche once said “God is dead.” and he believed God never existed. Freud believed that religion is created for someone to believe they are protected.
12. Explain and evaluate the views of Tolstoy and Kierkegaard, on the rationality of religious belief.
Tolstoy and Kierkegaard believes that just because there is no rational explanation doesn’t mean that there isn’t a god. Kierkegaard believes the idea of God is beyond what we believe. Tolstoy believes that faith can provide answers.
13. Explain and evaluate Pascal’s Wager. Would belief based on such an argument get you into heaven?
There were four possible outcomes in Pascal’s Wager, and only want give the option to go to heaven, so if this is the only reason for someone to belief, will be really difficult to get there at some point. The rest of the option just sent you to held, or talked about the small energy that you saved or wasted believing in God.
14. Explain and evaluate William Paley’s version of the design
John Searle and Rene Descartes both had opinions on dualism. John believe different aspects like mental and physical both are one substance. Rene, on the other hand, believes two different substances like mental and physical are different things. Rene even talked about how thoughts and feelings that are nonmaterial exists in material place.
2. Compare and contrast the views of George Berkeley and Thomas Hobbes on the mind.
George and Thomas believed that they both have the mind pretty much figured out. George thought the mindset and ideas came from the world around us and what is real. Thomas believes that there are no ideas, and that the mind itself just is motioned …show more content…
Existentlism is just freedom. Humans are not physical things but outside determinism too.
10. Explain, compare, and contrast the views of Anselm and Gaunilo regarding the Ontological argument.
Anselm and Gaunilo has had views on ontological. Anselm if we believe there are two objects that are identical one isn’t perfect and the other is. Gaunilo believes that Anselm’s theory is redundant because two words that sound the same aren’t for example, Sail and sale. The argument can work if everything is in …show more content…
Explain and evaluate the views of Freud and Nietzsche, on the rationality of religious belief.
Freud and Nietzsche doesn’t believe there is a god. Nietzsche once said “God is dead.” and he believed God never existed. Freud believed that religion is created for someone to believe they are protected.
12. Explain and evaluate the views of Tolstoy and Kierkegaard, on the rationality of religious belief.
Tolstoy and Kierkegaard believes that just because there is no rational explanation doesn’t mean that there isn’t a god. Kierkegaard believes the idea of God is beyond what we believe. Tolstoy believes that faith can provide answers.
13. Explain and evaluate Pascal’s Wager. Would belief based on such an argument get you into heaven?
There were four possible outcomes in Pascal’s Wager, and only want give the option to go to heaven, so if this is the only reason for someone to belief, will be really difficult to get there at some point. The rest of the option just sent you to held, or talked about the small energy that you saved or wasted believing in God.
14. Explain and evaluate William Paley’s version of the design