Pascal Wager's Argument

The existence of God has always been a commonly asked question in the world today. Since there is no scientifically proven answer, arguments have been accumulated over time. One being the Pascal Wager’s argument. This theory states that either God exists or God does not exist, you can either wager for God or wager against God. This belief advocates the belief in God rather than providing evidence. Does Pascal's Wager commit the fallacy of appealing to consequences?
Each individual mental processes things differently than others. Therefore, I believe that this is sort of an opinion based question, just depending which side you lean more toward. Personally, I believe the argument does commit a fallacy. Specifically, appeal to consequences. An