Preview

John Brown: Terrorist Or Freedom Fighter

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
294 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Brown: Terrorist Or Freedom Fighter
John Brown: Terrorist or Freedom Fighter
There are many people that think of Brown as a terrorist or freedom fighter. A lot of stuff he did was a freedom fighting kinds of things, while other people say he's a terrorist. So what I am really trying to find out id weather or not he's a freedom fighter or terrorist. John Brown fighting for a cause or not? He once said that God deemed him to free slaves. He's had people help him organize things and to get stuff to fight for what he believes in. Some people have tried to step in his way but he always seems to get around them. My conclusion of this paragraph is that he kept fighting when he had obstacles in his way. Browns " Inspiration" for doing everything he did. He grew up very religious.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    William Monroe Trotter was a well known early 20th century civil rights activist. His early life consisted of amazing educational honors, William became the first Black member of Phi Beta Kappa. In 1901, he founded the newspaper Boston Guardian, it served as propaganda against discrimination. Mr. Trotter was very outspoken in his views, so much so he was once arrested for heckling Booker T. Washington, an American educator and advisor to presidents of the United States, he shamelessly challenged the policies of President Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, and weighed in on many of the racial conflicts at the time, the most important being the Brownsville Affair and the Scottsboro case.…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hero or criminal? John Brown was a radical abolitionist who was born on May 9, 1800, in Torrington, Connecticut. He was one of the so-called worst and the greatest abolitionists of his time. Brown believed that violence was the one and only way to bring an end to slavery. He provoked the slaves to revolt against their owners by giving them guns and support. Also in 1859, Brown and his 21 men army seized the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry in the hope of gaining guns and supplies for the slaves. The attack was not a success because he was captured and both of his sons got killed during the fight. After a speedy trial, he was convicted to death, which in this case was not even such a huge surprise according to all the blood that he shed in the…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Muhammad Ali claimed that he was not going to be inducted into the United States Army because he “...ain’t got no quarrel with them Vietcong”, he was convicted of draft evasion, fined $10,000 and sentenced to five years in prison. Muhammad Ali gained his fighting licence back in 1970 and in 1971 and the conviction was appealed. His actions and bravery gave people courage to fight for what they believed in, which lead to people questioning the drafting process and helped start the anti-slavery movement. Muhammad Ali took a stand against the Supreme Court and showed them that all religious beliefs should be respected and considered before conviction.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did John Brown's Raid

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Between the years 1859 and 1863 John Brown’s rain on the Federal Armory at Harpers Ferry made him a hero in the North and a villain in the South. Brown’s raid was over in about 2 days. He wanted to start an armed slave revolt by seizing the Federal Armory. John Brown was hung for treason because of his actions. Brown’s plan was not to conduct a sudden raid and then escape to the mountains. Rather, his plan was to use those rifles and pikes he captured at the arsenal, in addition to those he brought along, to arm rebellious slaves with the aim of striking terror to the slaveholders in Virginia.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the History Court’s trial of John Brown, the jury found him to be guilty. John Brown was deemed guilty of being morally unjustified for an insurrection. This insurrection was the killing of several slave owners and their families, and the starting of a slave uprising. The Prosecution made several key points. Their first witness, William Wilberforce, was able to nonviolently stop the slave trade in Britain. Through his use of nonviolence, many people followed him. William stated that it was worth it, although it may have taken longer than if he had used violence. He said that if the process had been faster, people would’ve had to die. The Prosecution’s second witness, Levi Coffin, was an abolitionist and the president of the Underground…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John brown has been looked upon by many as a hero, but was he really a hero? Let’s look at the thing’s he’s done for abolition and think to ourselves as we read, “is this really what a ‘hero’ would do?” I’ll go into more detail later through out this of course, but for now, let’s review the gist of what he has “done for abolition.” From the third document, it states that he led only 21 men into the military arsenal in Harpers Ferry, Virginia. That was basically suicide for them. Yes, it was very brave of him, but he should have realized 21 men wouldn’t be enough for how many men that military had. He planned to give the weapons from the arsenal to slaves and start a chain reaction of revolts throughout the Southeast. All I have to ask is really? Did he really think that it would be that easy to take from the arsenal? Not only that, but in document two it also states that in 1856, Brown and six of his followers got revenge for the violence in Lawrence by killing five settlers in the pro-slavery camps along the Pottawatomie Creek. He also fled to Kansas, like a coward, to escape prosecution. This should be enough information for you, but let’s go into further detail.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who was Thaddeus Stevens? Mr. Stevens was an important member of the House of Representatives while Abraham Lincoln held office. Stevens was also one of the key leaders of the Radical Republican Movement of the 1860’s (“Thaddeus Stevens”). Thaddeus was against the South and the thought of inequality, mainly towards slaves and poor whites (Engdahl). He believed the suffrage of blacks was wrong and the South should be punished for causing devastation during the Civil War. In 1867, Thaddeus Stevens presented the “Speech in Favor of Black Suffrage” to the House of Representatives in Washington, D.C. He tried to to convince the house to punish the South by making them “pay” for the damages incurred from the civil war (Stevens).…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Brown was an American born abolitionist who actively fought Slavery through the use of violence. His ultimate goal was to overthrow the entire system of Slavery in the south, and he went about doing so through armed attacks, including his infamous raid on Harpers Ferry in 1859. John Brown’s armed attack on Harper’s Ferry caused a major dispute between the nation’s separate slavery movements, and had substantial effects in the social and political ideologies of the American people. His antics ultimately played a key role in the swaying of opinions towards slavery leading into the upcoming presidential election of 1860, and as a result, should be considered America’s first true hero. Despite his poorly thought out, and short lasting raid…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abraham Lincoln called John Brown a misguided fanatic! John Brown was not a misguided fanatic. John Brown tried his best to save the slaves from all the hard work and bring them to freedom, he just wanted slavery to end. Brown took a vow to end slavery when he found out that an abolitionist newspaperman was killed. He didn’t want anyone to harm the slaves, so he had a plan to save the slaves, he had a meeting with Frederick Douglass about the plan to save the slaves, so things wouldn't get out of hand, but Douglass opposed to his plan, Brown’s plan was to take over Harper’s Ferry, because Douglass knew that his plan would have failed and have also led to many black deaths, he thought that Brown would’ve hurt the abolition movement by causing…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Brown’s raid on Harper's Ferry he was perceived by the South as a villain and the North as martyr. Even more controversy arose between the two sides of the country because of Brown’s radicalistic approach to end slavery. Many have claimed that although he failed to attack Harper’s Ferry, he had a spark in him and had righteous cause. In the South, Brown was viewed as a dangerous criminal, and his actions increased the fear of a slave uprising.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Never boring: simple words that describe the simple life of one of the greatest American Heroes of all time. Over the years we have come to understand the Great Emancipator’s struggles and his determination to push for a better future for his nation. In the blink of war, Lincoln came to the nation’s rescue. But was Lincoln really the Great Emancipator? Was Lincoln actually opposed to the slavery movement? Or did he not consider the blacks to be an equal race? Did he make an active effort to free the slaves? Or was the emancipation a never Lincoln’s priority? In my opinion, although freeing the slaves was never Lincoln’s top priority during his tenure as president, Lincoln was sympathetic towards them. His main issue was the war and the probability of the union getting split into two. I believe that Lincoln may not have always seen the black race as equals and that the emancipation came about as a by-product of the Union getting saved.…

    • 2916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brown was completely insane I mean this guys a nut job. He had multiple family members inside insane asylum including three aunts, two uncles, his only sister, her daughter, and six first cousins., Now this is ultimately the case with John brown here as you can see not a shining image of mental health. John Brown also thought he was following Gods will when he raided and killed and pillaged. When it came time to go to court for John Brown he and his defense attorneys had decided that the only way to save him is that he needed to plead medically insane which I belive he is.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    himself to fight for what he believed in during the civil rights movement to the extent of being…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people during this time thought that slavery should be abolished. However, just because these individuals thought slavery should be done away with does not mean that every one of them actually voiced their concerns and stood up for the slaves. For example, George Washington was a slave owner himself, but after fighting a huge battle for his own independence he soon began rethinking being a slave owner. Washington never voiced his opinion on slavery, but freed every one of his slaves in his will. Many people thought that slavery should be abolished because of the way that it violated the slave’s human rights and gave the so called masters total control and the ability to dictate. Phyllis Wheatley was one of the many people that fought for the enslaved African American. Phyllis was a writer who wrote and spoke about the injustice of slavery. James Otis was a white colonist that believed slavery was “a huge violation of the law of nature.” John Allen shares the same beliefs as Otis and did all that he could to let his voice be heard and free slaves.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Extreme Abolition

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mahatma Gandhi once said, "Be the change you want to see in the world." What Gandhi meant by this quote was that if you do not like the current situation or are unhappy with it, then take it into your own hands and change it. Many historical events can be supported with this quotation. Back in the eighteenth century, the colonists were not satisfied of their treatment as citizens under the British crown. In turn, they did not just sit around and wait for England to set them free; they fought for their independence. The same can be said about any nation or group wanting independence. They know that sitting back and waiting for something to happen is not going to get them anywhere. Sometimes fighting for what you believe in is the only way to accomplish things. Fighting for specific causes was very prevalent in the nineteeth century, with the issue of slavery at the center. Abolition was a belief that some strongly believed in. There were abolitionists like Frederick Douglass who preached abolition in a nonviolent manner. On the other end of the spectrum there were abolitionists such as Nat Turner who took his abolitionist beliefs and expressed them violently. In 1831, Nat Turner led a violent slave rebellion, killing over 60 people, including many women and children. Although violent acts in response to slavery were criticized, it can be said that without these acts, the issue of slavery would never be resolved. Of course, that is not to say that abolitionists like Frederick Douglass and William Lloyd Garrison were not effective in the abolitionist movement, because they most definitely were. It is just that those like Nat Turner drew more attention because they took more of a physical and offensive position in the tricky game of slavery against the South. At the time, violent acts of abolition probably seemed to be doing more harm than good, but having a hindsight view today allows us to see that these extreme abolitionists did more good than harm by taking one…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays