top-rated free essay

Jeffersonian Republicans

By backlash4 Feb 11, 2010 761 Words
Jeffersonian Republicans
Broadness

With respect to the federal Constitution, the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict followers of the Constitution and opposed the broad constructionist of Federalist presidents such as George Washington and John Adams. In the time frame of 1801-1817, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the Republican presidents of the time demonstrated the differences of the Republican Party in several aspects involving the interpretation of the Constitution.

Thomas Jefferson and his Republican followers envisioned a society in vivid contrast to that of the Federalists. They dreamed of a nation of independent farmers living under a central government that exercised a minimum of control over their lives and served merely to protect the individual liberties granted by the Constitution. Jefferson, in his dialog with Presbyterian minister Samuel Miller, demonstrated that the government will only be ruled by the Constitution, and not even God would have a say. (Document B) That vision proved to be a mirage, and Jefferson was to preside over a nation that was growing more industrial and urban, which seemed to need an ever-stronger hand at the presidential “tiller.”

Jefferson, like Washington, was no “War Hawk.” In order to prevent the cry for war, he established the Embargo Act, which forbade ships from leaving the port for any foreign destination, thus avoiding confrontations with hostile vessels. The result was economic depression, particularly in the Northeast, as depicted in Alexander Anderson’s political cartoon of “OGRABME, or The American Snapping-turtle.” (Document C) This proved to be his most unpopular policy during both terms in office, which resulted in the third proposed amendment of the Hartford Convention, January 4th 1805: “Congress may not establish an embargo for longer then sixty days.” (Document E)

As Washington continued to move closer to Federalist Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton's vision of a strong central government that promoteing commercial and financial interests over states interests, Madison broke from Washington. As a result, he joined Jefferson to form the opposing party of Democratic-Republicans. During John Adams's presidency, Madison led the Republican fight against the Alien and Sedition Acts, which attempted to quell Republican opposition to Federalist foreign policy toward France. Madison authored the Virginia Resolutions, which declared the laws unconstitutional. Under Thomas Jefferson, Madison served as secretary of state, supporting the Louisiana Purchase and the embargo against Britain and France. Madison believed “that prominent success of the Constitution depends on a definite partition of powers between the general and the state governments.” (Document H) Indeed, Madison dominated foreign policy during Jefferson's administration, emerging from behind the scenes in 1808 to succeed him as the fourth president of the United States.

John Adams administration differed in the interpretation of the Constitution in his Alien and Sedation Acts. Republican leaders were convinced that these acts were unconstitutional, but the process of deciding on the constitutionality of federal laws was not yet established. Jefferson and Madison decided that the state legislature should have the power, and they drew up a series of resolutions, which was introduced to Kentucky and Virginia. They proposed the “compact theory” of John Lock be applied, which would allow the states to “nullify.”

Throughout the “Jeffersonian Era” conflict with the Federalist and Republicans can be seen in several scenarios; most vivid is the court case Marbury vs. Madison. William Marbury, one of Adams’ “midnight appointments,” sued Secretary of State Madison to force delivery of his commission as a justice of the peace in the federal district. John Marshall as Supreme Court justice, refused to rule on the request, claming that the law that gave the Supreme Court jurisdiction over such matters had exceeded the Constitutional grant of powers and thus was unconstitutional. Marshall then established judicial review over federal legislation, a power that in turn has become the foundation of the Supreme Court’s check on the other two branches of government. Conflict with

The people and the Republicans can be seen. With the Constitution to back Madison’s conscription bill of 1814, the people were outraged that the country could “take their ‘children,’ and compel them to fight the battles of any war.” (Document D).

Although the two parties differed in many aspects of their political handling, they fought for a “common good”- the future of America. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the Republican presidents of the time, demonstrated the differences in the two “parties” in several aspects involving the interpretation of the Constitution. Whether it be “strict” or “loose” interpretation of the Constitution, the best interest of the American citizen was at hand.

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • Democratic V. Republican Views

    ...Period 5 March 3, 2013 Donkey V. Elephant Solely based on this assessment of my opinions on ten issues, I am a Republican… slightly. Out of the ten issues, I had six Republican views and Democratic views. However, as Ray Bradbury said, “I hate all politics. I don't like either political party. One should not belong to them - one should b...

    Read More
  • The differences between Jeffersonian and Jacksonian democracies.

    ...history. A product of the times, it is always changing. Both Jeffersonian democracy and Jacksonian democracy were based on the beliefs in the freedom and equal rights of all men. However, Jacksonians acted more thoroughly on these ideas. While these two men essentially shared many of the same beliefs and ideas, there was a noticeable difference ...

    Read More
  • Jeffersonian Republicans vs. Federalists

    ...Jeffersonian Republicans vs. Federalists In regards to the United States constitution, Jeffersonian Republicans have been known as strict constructionists who had a narrow interpretation of the constitution following it to an extreme power. This was in opposition to the Federalists who had often followed a loose construction policy. And to a c...

    Read More
  • Jeffersonian Republicans vs. Federalists

    ...the young colonies of America broke away from their mother country and began to grow and develop into an effective democratic nation, many changes occurred. As the democracy began to grow, two main political parties developed, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. Each party had different views on how the government should be run....

    Read More
  • The Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists

    ...The Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists By 1817 the great American experiment was in full swing. America was developing into an effective democratic nation. However as the democracy continued to grow, two opposing political parties developed, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans believed in strong...

    Read More
  • Jeffersionan Republicans vs. Federalists

    ...in the early 19th century, the two dominant political parties, the Democratic Republicans and the Federalists, had many conflicting belies. The Federalists believed that the federal government had certain implied powers that were not laid out in the Constitution. The Jeffersonian Republicans, on the other hand, believed that the government did n...

    Read More
  • Jeffersonian V. Jacksonian Democracy

    ...Jeffersonian vs. Jacksonian Democracy Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson were two influential political figures in two very different eras. Each formed their own democracy that helped shape the way people think about American government. Consequently, they had their differences, yet they also had their similarities. Viewpoints between the two ...

    Read More
  • Jeffersonian vs. Jacksonian Democracy

    ...Jeffersonian vs. Jacksonian Democracy Both Jefferson and Jackson were fighting for the interests of farmers against the commercial and mercantile interests of the country. Jefferson was portrayed as a man of the people, but he remained a wealthy planter who tended to associate only with other elites. His mannerisms were much more ...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.