IPO Study

Topics: Factor analysis, Governance, Corporate governance Pages: 9 (2996 words) Published: October 19, 2014
AWARENESS OF CORPORATE GOVERANCE IN
EMPLOYEES: A STUDY OF PROFESSIONALS AND NONPROFESSIONALS
SEEMA MEHTA
Prestige Institute of Management

TARIKA SINGH
Prestige Institute of Management

S. S. BHAKAR
Prestige Institute of Management

UMESH HOLAI
Jiwaji University
Corporate governance has recently emerged as an issue of global significance. The present era is of intense global competition with customers becoming more knowledgeable and demanding. Not only the customers but also the shareholders are becoming increasingly aware of the present competitive environment. Customers rank firms based on ability to invest and manage physical assets, competition and the ability to exploit intangible assets, transparency of operations and soft assets. There is some evidence, albeit inconclusive, to suggest that there is a positive relationship between corporate governance and improvements in corporate performance. The paper investigates the awareness level of corporate governance among professionals and non professionals in Gwalior region. The study resulted in six underlying factors for corporate governance viz., social responsibility, legal system, competitive advantage, long term, transparent system, and healthier practice. The findings of the paper reveals that the there is no significant difference in the awareness of corporate governance among professionals and non-professionals. Also results of the z test applied between professionals and non-professionals for the difference in factors gave the similar results. Only for one factor competitive advantage, the level of awareness among professionals and non professionals was found to be different.

In its narrowest sense, corporate governance is about how an organization is directed and controlled. It is about the structures and processes in place to facilitate and monitor effective management of an organization, including mechanisms to ensure legal compliance and prevent improper or unlawful behavior. Corporate governance encompasses how an organization is managed, its corporate and other structures, its culture, its policies and strategies, and the ways in which it deals with its various stakeholders. Broadly, governance involves the systems and processes in place that shape, enable and oversee management of an organization.

Corporate governance involves two dimensions, which are the responsibility of the board (or governing body/individual), performance and conformance. There are some commonly accepted key principles or elements of good governance that are applicable to both the public and private sectors. The three most common principles are: accountability – both internal and external; transparency/openness; and recognition of stakeholder/shareholder rights. Often to these are added: efficiency, integrity,

stewardship, leadership, and an emphasis on performance as well as compliance, and stakeholder participation or inclusiveness.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Research into the theory and practice of corporate governance has been heavily focused in English speaking countries and the United States in particular. Most of the available empirical evidence comes from the United States like Shleifer and Vishny (1997). Hollingsworth et al. (1994) stated that in the 1950s and 1960s hardly anyone disagreed with the assumption that the more traditional methods of governance needed to be changed and therefore, backward economies like Japan, Germany, or Europe as a whole would have to adopt American pattern of industry organization. Dalton and Daily (1999) stated that corporate governance is the process by which corporation is made responsive to the rights and wishes of stakeholder. Morck (1988), wrote that it is the relationship among various participants in determining the direction and performance of corporation. While Jensen and Meckling (1976), Fama and Jensen (1983), Eisenhardt (1989) suggested that corporate governance should enable owners to exercise control over...


References: Aoki, M. 1993. Japanese Capitalism: Past, Present, Future. Paper presented to
Columbia University Law School’s Center for Law and Economic Studies, New
Barney, J. B., & Ouchi, W. G. 1986. Organizational Economics: Toward A New
Paradigm for Understanding
Biais, B., & Perotti E. 2002. Machiavellian Privatization. American Economic Review,
92: 240-258.
Baysinger, B. D., & Butler, H. 1985. Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors:
Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition
Bebchuk, L., & Roe, M. 1999. A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Governance
and Ownership
Blair, M. M. 1995. Ownership and Control: Rethinking Corporate Governance for
Twenty-first Century
Bushee, B. 1998. The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment
Behavior
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. 1999. Number of
Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Donaldson, L. 1990. The Ethereal Hand. Organizational Economics and Management
Theory, 15(3): 369-81.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. 1995. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation:
Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of
Management Review, 14(1): 57-74.
Fama E., & Jensen, M. 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law
and Economics, 26: 301-25.
Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. 2003. Corporate Governance and Equity Prices.
Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O.D. 1980. Disclosure Laws and Takeover Bids. Journal of
Finance
Hilmer, F. G. 1993. Strictly Boardroom: Improving Governance to Enhance Company
Performance
Hollingsworth, J. R., Schmitter, P., & Streeck, W. 1994. Governing Capitalist
Economies: Performance and Control of Economic Sectors
Jensen. M. C. 1986. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and
Takeovers
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior,
Agency Costs and Ownership Structure
Lee, J. 2004. The Effects of Family Ownership and Management on Firm Performance.
Mayer, C. 1997. Corporate Governance, Competition and Performance. Journal of
Law and Society, 24: 152-176.
Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1988. Management Ownership and Market
Valuation: An Empirical Analysis
McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. 1990. Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and
Corporate Value
Randøy, T., Oxelheim, L., & Stonehill, A. 2001. Global Financial Strategies and
Corporate Competitiveness
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1997. A Survey of Corporate Governance. Journal of
Finance, 52 (2): 737-783.
Walsh, J. P., & Seward, J. K. 1990. On the Efficiency of Internal and External
Corporate Control Mechanisms
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Factors Affecting Study Habits Research Paper
  • of studies Research Paper
  • study skills Essay
  • study skills essay
  • Study Skills Essay
  • case study Essay
  • Hawthorne Studies Essay
  • Case Study Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free