Preview

Influence of European States to Unification of Italy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
778 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Influence of European States to Unification of Italy
Why was the influence of other European states important to the creation of a united Italy?

Introduction
Italy was unified in 1871. There were three important individuals who had shown extreme efforts in unifying Italy.
They were Mazzini, garibaldi and Cavour. Cavour was considered to be the most important person in unifying Italy, Eventhough he only ends the steps of Mazzini and garibaldi who initially started the idea of uniting Italy. However, it had been claimed that the assistance of foreign power was the most important reasons for Italian unification during the period of 1848 to 18 71.
Firstly the influence of France was important to the unification to the unification of Italy. After the help of Cavour to France in the Crimean war. Napoleon iii promised to help Cavour in fighting against Austria through the compact of plombieres in 1855 where in the treaty napoleon iii agreed to help Italy against Austria and if they were success in defeating Austria, Italy promised to give Savoy and nice to France. When the war against Austria occurred in 1859, napoleon iii sent his troops to Italy and France would gain nice and Savoy. Therefore the influenced of France helped Italy gaining Lombardy from Austria.
The influenced of Prussia was also important to the creation of the united of Italy. In 1866, the austro-prussian war occurred. Garibaldi fought against the Austrian when the Italian government formed an alliance with Bismarck. Bismarck promised to give Venetia to Italy if the Italians help them fight against Austria. The Italians helped the Prussians to win and the Prussian handed over the Venetia to the Italians as promised. Therefore, the influenced of Prussia leas to Italy successfully gained Venetia.
The influence of Britain was also important in unifying Italian. When Italy offered help in the Crimean was, Britain rejected their helped because Britain that time had serious problem in its own country. Britain also warned both Austria and France that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Britain and Italy’s relationship was cordial before the Abyssinian crisis, indicating success in their appeasement policies. The Stresa front of 1935 between: Britain, France and Italy manifested this, as they agreed to prevent further revision of the treaty from Hitler and to resist him in his expansionist aims, and to also condemn Hitler’s actions. The Stresa front was suggested by Mussolini himself who was very co-operative and acted on the side of Britain and France as they all shared the same opinion on German rearmament. This showed how prepared Mussolini was to take action and stand against German aggression, as Mussolini was the only one who actually sent troops, during the Austrian Putsch of 1934, when the Nazi’s attempted to exploit Austria’s condition by trying to take over and employ a Nazi government. Italy was the only country who was prepared to take stance that was not mere condemnation but an actual military reaction, these clearly suggested Mussolini strong feelings in regards to Hitler. This found great success as they all agreed to it and this manifested Britain’s success in appeasement policies.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro Study Guide

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Italian unification: Savoy- ruled Piedmont in N Italy = best hope for unification when lead by Count Camillo di Cavour prime minister to Victor Emmanuel II.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assessments chapter 9

    • 529 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. How did the lack of a single strong ruler benefit Italy during the Renaissance?…

    • 529 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Susan Muthan1

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Though some wanted to stick to tradition, there were some important and influential people who encouraged the unification. Giuseppe Mazzini, attorney, believed that Italy deserved to be a nation and it was about time all the parts of the monarchy to be part of one big republic in unification. Along with Mazzini, Carlo Cattaneo, philosopher and political activist, also believed in the unification of this monarchy would be a right step for Italy. He said that even though it would mix them, it won’t take their culture and traditions off the grid like they believed, but instead, they would all be appreciated and remembered. Vincenzo Gioberti, a priest of Piedmont stated that the unification would actually make the kings stronger without damaging their own independence.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perhaps the most apparent and important problem which faced Italy was that of their economic situation, a lot of this due to the great north south divide. The north was going through a great industrial revolution with many new factories and other industries opening up creating many new jobs allowing the workers to earn enough money to live reasonably comfortably. On the other hand the south was still controlled mainly by wealthy landowners which lead to much poverty which contributed to the poor economic climate in Italy. This problem also meant that many southern Italians emigrated to America, but once they stopped Italians from entering the country, this was no longer an option. It is argueable that the government did however attempt to solve this problem with the invasion of Libya on the 29th september 1911. This was a promising decision made by Giolitti because it not only kept the Nationalists happy for a short while but it also meant that people in Italy now had somewhere else that they could emigrate to which meant that more money would be sent back to boost the economy. Also it provided lots of new Italian civilians that could be taxed. Despite these economic benefits the war did cost Italy a vast amount of money and thousands of soldiers were lost.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The north of Italy was largely controlled by Austria, and their military prowess allowed them to greatly dominate the north and quickly stop any revolts…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Garibaldi's popularity, his skill at rousing the common people, and his military exploits are all credited with making the unification of Italy possible. He also served as a global exemplar of mid-19th century revolutionary nationalism and liberalism. But following the liberation of southern Italy from the Neapolitan monarchy, Garibaldi chose to…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Use your own knowledge to assess how far the Sources support the interpretation that the creation of the Kingdom of Northern Italy was due mainly to the support of France.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    based in Rome, losing influence over much of Northern Europe. Weakened, the various Italian city-states became vulnerable to conquest by Spain, France, and Austria. Italy remained a patchwork of principalities controlled through proxy by various European powers until the 19th century, when the French leader Napoleon supported the unification of Italy as a way of creating a buffer state against his many enemies. With the backing of France, Italian nationalist Giuseppe Garibaldi led a popular movement that took over much of Italy in 1861 and would be ending in 1870 with the fall of Rome and complete unification of the…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nationalism DBQ

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another group of people that was heavily impacted by the effects of nationalism were the Italian people. In 1850, Italy was ruled by many different empires. They were separate states with no unification whatsoever. The Northern regions were richer than the south, and the two areas had nothing in common. Italy had lack of unity, which is shown in the fact that Mazzini wanted a Republic, the Pope wanted a confederation, and Charles Albert wanted a kingdom. When Cavour rose as a prominent nationalist figure in Italy, he used many…

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Dbq

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationalism was a key factor in building nations. Throughout the years Italians were growing impatient and dissatisfied under foreign rule. Count Cavour was responsible for the brains behind the unification of Italy. He believed that releasing the Italians from foreign rule would not only leave the country authoritative and superb but also supply the people with intelligence and knowledge (Doc. 3). Italian Nationalists looked up to the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia because of their power over the Italian states. In 1848, the kingdom had adopted a liberal constitution. So to the middle class liberals, unification under Piedmont Sardinia was appealing. Giuseppe Garibaldi, the leader of army of nationalists, captured Sicily. After marching across the Italian mainland their was an agreement to let the Sardinian king rule. Like Italy, Germany achieved national unity around the same time. The Austrian Empire took over the German confederation; however, Prussia was prepared to unify them. Prussia had a mainly German empire. Therefore, nationalism truly unified Prussia. When Bismarck took control, he was a master of realpolitik. Bismarck’s method for uniting Germany was through blood and iron (Doc 5). He believed that the power of Germany should be allocated over all German People. In his eyes, war was the only option to achieving success.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nazi Germany’s obvious political and military ally in Europe was Italy. The Italians had been governed by a fascist regime under Benito Mussolini since 1925. Italian fascism was very much the elder brother of Nazism, a fact Hitler himself acknowledged. Yet for all their ideological similarities, the relationship between Hitler and Mussolini was bumpy and complex. The alignment of their two countries was consequently not as firm as many anticipated. By the late 1930s Germany and Italy had become military allies – however their priorities were still with their own national interests, rather than supporting the interests or ambitions of another country. The union between Nazi Germany and fascist Italy became a marriage of convenience and expedience, rather than a firm alliance of sister states.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cavour was from Piedmont, which was a state in northern Italy still under the control of the Habsburg in the XIXth century. Because he was from the northern, european, civilized Italy states, it is questionable wether or not he wanted to create one nation along with the southern, more african-like, uncivilized Italy states. However, it can be shown that Cavour did want a unification of some sort for Italian states. To unify a nation to form a single state, a very strong nationalism is needed, which he showed by creating a local newspaper in 1847 bearing the name of the Italian unification movement (Il Risorgimento), as well as by causing a war with Austria jsut to get a free Italy. He also created a youth movement called the young Italy.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is because the major powers listed could've possibly forged alliances with other smaller countries, and if one goes down, the rest fall with it. More alliances were formed as a defense mechanism against increasing threats from one side, but Italy was a fickle nation, switching between the sides depending on which one was “winning.” Nationalism, by definition, is pride in your country and its practices, beliefs, and many other factors. A certain type of ego rose up in the people, which we all know is never a good thing. There was a battle to the death for the top spot in economic competition, especially for Great Britain and Germany.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Italian people were living in the control of foreign rulers. The ideal Italian leaders were Giuseppe Mazzini, Cavour, and Giuseppe Garibaldi. Mazzini centralized the republic and gave more emphasis on the right and the will of the people. Next, Gioberti headed the federation of existing states, and then Italian nations were built around the aristocratic kingdom of Sardinia-Piedmont as german looked towards Prussia. Cavour has played a prominent role in the Sardinina government from the period 1850 to 1861. He was recognized as a dominant figure during that time. In 1852, Cavour was elected as a chief minister in the Sardinian monarchy. Likewise Cavour made the necessary arrangements and took actions wisely in order to integrate northern and central Italy. Also, Cavour acquainted several programs of railroads, highways, civil liberties and provided assistance for Sardinia. Moreover, with the help of France, he achieved victory over Austria and Lombardy. Thereafter Garbaldi removed the Sicily kingdom and then finally in 1860, southern Italy and Sicily was given to…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics