Preview

Indian Removal Dbq

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1123 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Indian Removal Dbq
During the early to mid-1800s, the relationship between Americans and Native Americans became severely strained. Many Americans believed the western land was completely their own through the devastating concept of manifest destiny. Among the people carefully observing this issue were not just people who were supportive of forcefully taking Indian land, but also those who were opposed to it. This clashing conflict between the two groups intensified as their differences developed. Americans believed the Indians absolutely could not become assimilated and civilized instead than savage. Native Americans would no longer be idle and acquiesce to the treaties forced upon them, nor would they meekly accept the abuse. A notable supporter of Indian Removal …show more content…
Jackson’s plans of removal were favored by many because he continued to promote the idea that it was in the best interest for Native Americans. These cruel ideas did not appear in the mindset of Americans when Jackson was elected. Moreover, he simply carried out things in what he believed to be a “milder process”. The idea of removal had been an issue for awhile, but as Americans got closer, action had to be taken. “Rightly considered, the policy of the General Government toward the red man is not only liberal, but generous.”, wrote Jackson, expressing his belief that Americans were generously providing Indians with blessings. Jackson stated that he had given them many incentives to leave. He arrogantly refers to these motives as “obvious advantages”. In addition, giving Native Americans motivation to move was necessary because “they can not live in contact with a civilized community and prosper”. He specified these incentives in an imperious statement, “The General Government kindly offers him a new home, and proposes to pay the whole expense of his removal and settlement”. It is important to note that Jackson wrote about the Government’s offer and called it kind because he surely believed they were imparting benevolence on Native Americans. Native Americans would be “furnished gratuitously with provisions for the period of a year after their arrival …show more content…
Among them was Chief Ross of the Cherokee Nation. Despite the practicality in the perspective of the Americans, removal of Native Americans was absolutely illegal. The Treaty of New Echota was a strong point in Ross’s argument. An incident occurred where false deputies who did not have the right to represent the Cherokee Nation signed the treaty itself. Therefore, after receiving word of this fraudulent occurrence, the treaty should have been voided. Yet, the government did not. Ross desperately stated, “We are stripped of every attribute of freedom and eligibility for legal self-defense.” It is important to remember that translators were scarce and that exploitation of Native Americans was vital in the plans of Americans to cede western land. So, Ross solemnly expresses his disdain with the illegal treaty and exploitations as he wrote, “and our acquiescence in its requirements demanded (...) and the threat of summary compulsion in case of refusal”. Ross woefully described the forcefulness of Americans onto them. This meant that if Native Americans did not accept the treaty and move, they would be painfully forced off their dear land in due time. Additionally, Ross fervently wrote more about the exploitation of his people. “And we are constrained solemnly to declare, that we cannot but contemplate the enforcement of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Jackson's reasons for the Indian Removal is that they were in the way of the white people's expansion and that most were starting to break the laws of the land. The Indians should not be removed because it was their land first and it is inhumane.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John L. O’Sullivan had said, “‘... our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions.’” (www.britanica.com) During Andrew Jackson’s term, America had set its sights on the untamed West - which, inconveniently, happened to be the Indians’ territory. President Jackson decided to create a controversial treaty that would allow America to exchange the Indians’ land for a large piece of land in the Louisiana Territory. It was created on May 28, 1830 and sparked much criticism and support throughout the nation. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because the Indians were enemies of America, they were given good land, and they were offered the government’s protection.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When English colonists first arrived to the New World, the Native American Indians were curious yet kind to these “white men”. However, as time passed the colonists’ hunger for more land grew stronger. They began to take advantage of the Indians by signing treaties that were not completely understood by the natives. Consequently, a brave Indian took upon the initiative to protect their properties. Tecumseh, leader of the Shawnee, began his quest to put a stop to American greed by uniting the molested tribes to defend their lands.…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No, I do not agree that Georgia and the United States were justified in forcing the Indian tribes to leave their homeland and move to the Oklahoma territory. I believe the Tribes were taken advantage of and abused by the states whenever possible.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unfortunately, despite how precisely Indians followed white men’s laws and requirements, the Indian Removal would have eventually transpired. The Five Civilized Tribes shed their Indian traditions and culture to take on the Americans way of life. Indians not only adopted principles in government and agriculture, but also religiously. Despite all of this, whites still wanted to kick Indians out of their lands in order to bring profit to themselves. Even the national government could not terminate the Indian Removal. Through both the United States Constitution and Worcester v. Georgia, the national government declared that states could not operate the removal of Indians. All of this, illustrates the inhumanity and lack of compassion whites had…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 1830, President Andrew Jackson (1829–1837) signed the Indian Removal Act, which would take tribes of eastern Indians, living in settled states, and resettle them in specially designated districts west of the Mississippi River in Indian Territory (now the state of Oklahoma). Many tribes were affected by the Indian Removal Act. Most notably, the Cherokees, Choctaws, Creeks, Chickasaws, and Seminoles tribes were subjected to eviction (O’Neill 11). By the large, these tribes were known as the "Five Civilized Tribes" (weiser). The tribes had their own customs, traditions, government, and territories. Until When the Indian Removal Act was implemented, however, they found themselves equally casted out. Though the terms of their departures diverse, the Five…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indian Removal Policy

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Land disputes and law jurisdiction cases had begun to appear quite frequently in the United States Supreme Court during the time the Indian Policy was put into effect after the war. Congress had to address the situation so they came up with the Indian Policy. It was concluded that, “discovery also gave the discoverer the exclusive right to extinguish Indian title either by purchase or by conquest. Natives were recognized only as temporary occupants of the land, and not as owners (Learn NC). The decision to move the Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi River, decided by the Jackson administration, was more of a reformulation of the national policy that had been in effect since the 1790’s.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    More land is benefit for a country of course americans want to make their country grow better so they need more land, so now we gong to talk about should Indians move? Of course that the Cherokee should move,Cause of the threat from the U.S.invaders ,and the U.S. leaders of already signed the Indian removal act,and they move is for avoid more sacrifice of their people, the whole nation.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Document J people assumed Jackson hated indians and wanted them out and gone far forever .Jackson wanted indian tribes to have a guaranteed stay district west of the Mississippi . He mentions how the tribes have become extinct because of “persuasion and force they have been made to retire from river to river and from mountain to mountain “(document j,page 61). Jackson wants to prevent that and give the indian tribes a permanent stay .…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Andrew Jackson was greatly amiss in his measure to force the Indians out of their homes were their ancestors had lived in long ago. Thus because, he used brutal force and harsh conditions before and during the removal of the Indian tribes. “Men paid to move the Cherokee Nation are cruel”(Cherokee). This segment was published on April 4, 1838 along with other various articles, and explains that the Cherokee new that the government would not treat them with respect nor kindness. While disliked by the vast majority of Indians, most of the everyday people actually admired Jackson because they saw him as somewhat of a hero because he gave the perception that the Indians were uncivilized savages, and by removing them he…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some wanted to fight but others thought it was better to agree to leave in exchange for the money and other concessions. It was in 1835 that a few self-appointed representatives for the Cherokee nation negotiated the Treaty of Echota. This treaty traded all Cherokee land east of the Mississippi for $5 million, relocated assistance and compensation for lost property. Many of the Cherokee people felt betrayed but to the United States government, it was a done deal; which is understandable because the negotiators did not represent the tribal government or anyone else. Because of this, the nation’s principal chief, John Ross, decided to petition the treaty and nearly 16,000 Cherokees signed this petition, but the treaty was approved by congress.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a rule, the Native Americans are perhaps the most overlooked sector of the population of the colonies. This war completely varied their knowledge of their land and its value. “We know our lands have now become more valuable,” (Document B). No more would they be fooled by the trickery that cheated them of Manhattan Island; no longer were they ignorant to real estate. They opposed the immigrants who settled in their lands, pleading with the colonists to control these squatters lest violence should ensue. “Your people daily settle on these lands…we must insist on your removing them, as you know they have no right to settle,” (Document B).…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson had given a speech about the removal act. He didn't care what tribe of Indians it was he didn't want any Indians on "His" land. In Jacksons mind if one tribe of Indians left they would all leave. If only it was that easy for him, but it wasn't. Jackson only wanted the Indians gone because he "Needed" the land for his white people.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The proposition calling for equal rights and political democracy of the inhabitants of America were in confutation with the principles calling for the US to follow colonial principles of the European empires that had begun to invade North America in the late 1400s. The colonies that had revolted against British rule in the late 1700s had continued the expansion of settlements and political incorporation that had been practiced since the founding of colonies at Jamestown and Plymouth. The proposal of Indian Removal debated in the US Congress was a straightforward expression of that same expansionism, which dispensed with the past policies of the US that had combined expansion with treaty negotiations that had the form of a meeting and agreements of equals, and proclamations of Indian rights and sovereignty. There was a national campaign developed in support of the Indian resistance, particularly from the Cherokee, that involved diatribes and petitions, public meetings and Congressional debates. The opposition to Removal was advancing principles that in effect called for the US to develop practical policy that was in line with its past proclamations that upheld its treaty commitments to the Indian communities.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays