Preview

How Did The Cherokee Removal

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
502 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Cherokee Removal
Cherokee Removal In 1828, Andrew Jackson was presented as president. He wanted to remove Indians to have more land for the white people. When Jackson wanted to remove the Indians most cooperated, but not the Cherokee Indians. The Cherokee Indians refused to leave their land. Jackson had given a speech about the removal act. He didn't care what tribe of Indians it was he didn't want any Indians on "His" land. In Jacksons mind if one tribe of Indians left they would all leave. If only it was that easy for him, but it wasn't. Jackson only wanted the Indians gone because he "Needed" the land for his white people. No Indian respected Jackson, but Cherokees were the worst of all. They went along with their daily lives as they knew they were going to …show more content…
He had not chosen to follow the rules of the court. He thought because he was president that he didn't need to follow their rules. He wanted to do things his way like any American would. Jackson was a democrat which meant there were democratic policy's. You could take a guess and say that Jackson didn't follow those policies either. Your guess would be right. Jackson didn't care what other people thought about Indians all that mattered was himself and his ideas, the Indians weren't part of his world. As the Cherokee Indians continued to resist leaving there land, one Indian had other thoughts. The Indians now have a written alphabet made for them by a Cherokee member himself. The Indians them made school for the children to attend. The children attended these schools to learn how to read and write the language that was made. Of course this didn't make Jackson happy. As time past the Cherokee Indians didn't resist leaving any more. They knew if they didn't leave they could be killed. Then Jackson would have his way. At this time Jackson was not a well respected president, but he could be a hero. He could win wars, battles, and even redeemed himself from the Indian removal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy Dbq

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    let him enforce it." Jackson claimed that the "common man" wanted the Indians removed and…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jackson became very concerned about the Native Americans. He was well liked by many chiefs due to his worrying for their welfare. He even took an orphaned Indian and raised him. Jackson was sure that as soon as the Indians adopted the white man’s’ habits, they would become complete citizens. But Jackson felt that since the white man wanted Indian territory and the two races could not cooperate, it would be best for the existence of Indians if they were removed.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1838 and 1839 Andrew Jackson from Tennessee was forceful on Indian Removal, and from 1814 to 1824 jackson was instrumental in negotiating nine out of 11 treaties, which had devastated the southern tribes of their eastern lands in the west. So the Cherokee indians were tired of it so they went to the supreme court. The n in 1830 Jackson pushed a whole new piece of legislation called the “Indian Removal Act”. Jackson’s attitude towards the Native Americans came off as rude because he did not like the Indians and he wanted them gone.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were in a foreign place. The Seminoles, Creeks, Cherokees, Choctaws, and Chickasaws Indian tribes are just a few examples of the Indians removed from their homes (Doc 4). In document four you can see that they all came from very different and unique lands and were all simply grouped into one territory. Andrew Jackson had no sympathy for them. He called them savages and recognized them as an inferior race (Doc 3). He also said that they had “neither the intelligence, the industry, the moral habits, nor the desire of improvement” to change their condition. Andrew Jackson publically degraded Native Americans everywhere and made his hatred…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Age of Jackson Dbq

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, dictating that all Indians living in the Deep South had to move to Eastern Oklahoma, because the Indians had something everyone else wanted, land. Jackson says in his First Inaugural Address,“It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy, and to give that humane and considerate attention to their rights and their wants which is consistent with the habits of our Government and the feelings of our people.” Jackson is saying that It will be his genuine and continuous desire towards the Indian tribes, and we want to give them a fair and open policy, and give humane and kind attention to their rights and their wants which is the same with the habits of our government and the feelings of our people. He wants to give the Indian tribes a good policy. Later on, he removes the Indian tribes from their homes in the Deep South and makes them march on the trail of tears, where they relocate to Eastern Oklahoma.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson treat Indians as suject of the United States, and he promoted the Indian Removal Acts because he believed removal could save the Indians from extinction instead of assimilation. Then, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was passed, appropriating $500,000 to relocate eastern tribes west of the Mississippi which was a ethnic expulsion. Public were disagreed with this explusion, even…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Andrew Jackson Dbq Essay

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to Sean Wilentz, the Indian Removal “has, in recent historical writing, become the great moral stain on the Jacksonian legacy, much as it was to Christian humanitarian reformers in 1829 and 1830 a policy, supposedly, that aimed at the ‘infantilization’ and ‘genocide’ of the Indians.”6 Many Americans were against this legislation because they believed that Americans were taking the rights of Indians and treating them as slaves. The removal came from the threat Native Americans gave. They wanted to be able to have their own constitution, separating them from the US. One of Jackson’s biggest fears was that “sovereign Indian nations would prove easy prey for manipulation by hostile foreign powers.”7 To Jackson, all Indians were inferiors to whites, and the Indian removal Act was an act that would give land to white settlers. He argued that the legislation would provide land for white citizens, improve security against foreign invaders and encourage the civilization of the Native Americans. Andrew Jackson even argued in one speech, this "will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions; will retard the progress of decay, which is lessening their numbers, and perhaps cause them gradually, under the protection of the government and through the influences of good…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson never considered Native Americans as potential citizens. This is why he didn’t care when he forced the Indians to move out of their native land. The Native Americans wanted to stay, in document 9 it said,…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Document J people assumed Jackson hated indians and wanted them out and gone far forever .Jackson wanted indian tribes to have a guaranteed stay district west of the Mississippi . He mentions how the tribes have become extinct because of “persuasion and force they have been made to retire from river to river and from mountain to mountain “(document j,page 61). Jackson wants to prevent that and give the indian tribes a permanent stay .…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Jackson is a villain for passing the Indian Removal Act in 1830, allowing the Government to forcefully remove the Native Americans from Southern lands to Georgia. Jackson’s reasoning for this was that it will separate them from the whites, free them from power of the states, let them pursue their own happiness, and help them become civilized. His reasons did not make much sense to many because what if they were already happy where they were? What if they were already civilized? Jackson did not care. This changed a lot of people’s opinion of him especially because during the Worcester vs. Georgia case, the Supreme Court gave the Cherokee their victory simply stating that they did exist, but Jackson ignored it. He immediately wanted to enforce the law and made federal troops force out all the remaining Cherokee people living in Georgia, with only…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason I found Jackson to be an interesting president was because of the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This law was passed by congress and signed by Jackson. "An Act to provide for an exchange of lands with the Indians . . . and for their removal west of the river Mississippi"-authorized the president to negotiate and sign removal treaties in which Indian nations abandoned lands east of the Mississippi in return for unsettled, federal lands west of the Mississippi. The legislation was emotionally contested in Congress and it barely passed. Once enacted, Jackson and the treaty negotiators he appointed “persuaded, manipulated, “and in some cases “coerced” dozens of tribes to sign removal treaties. This to me was inappropriate and selfish on his half.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jacksonian Democrats

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A major dilemma for Jackson was what to do with Native Americans living in the South and on this issue Jackson failed at protecting the rights of Native Americans. As shown in the picture, Native Americans living in the South were driven away from their lands to Oklahoma on a path known as the Trail of Tears. Did the Native Americans not have the same rights as the whites living in the South? Apparently Jackson and his successor Martin Van Buren did not ever consider this question and upon this they failed to protect the Constitution. In relation to the issue of Indian removal came another violation of the Constitution by Andrew Jackson. When John Marshall and the Supreme Court ruled that Georgia's extension of state law over Cherokee land was unconstitutional, Andrew Jackson totally ignored the decision. This action violated Supreme Court decisions and strengthened Jackson's reputation as an enemy of the law.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democrats

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A major problem for Jackson was what to do with Native Americans living in the South and on this issue Jackson decided he had to do what was best for his people. (Document G)Native Americans living in the South were driven away from their lands to Oklahoma on a path known as the Trail of Tears. This allowed southerners to expand their farms and made available more growing space. Andrew Jackson fought against the Supreme Court to get this approved; this only proved that Jackson was for his people.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq on Andrew Jackson

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When it came to protecting individual liberties, Jacksonians favored the white male population, but totally ignored others. They wanted to move all of the Indians who lived in the eastern lands to western lands past the Mississippi River. Jackson bolstered their case. Even after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Cherokee tribe and its right to remain where it was, Jackson did not comply and he forcefully ejected the native people from their land. The Trail of Tears shows the painful journey the Indians had to take; the journey killed almost 4,000 people (doc. G). Jackson, by instigating the demise of the Bank, failed to protect the individual liberties of the wealthy class. In Document C, Daniel Webster states, “…It manifestly seeks to inflame the poor against the rich; it wantonly attacks whole classes of people, for the purpose of turning against them the prejudices and the resentments of the other classes.” This quote shows that Jackson violated the wealthy peoples’ liberties because of his own biased opinions.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He had thought that he had been doing the Indians a favor by moving them away from the state's oppression against them but he had only been damaging the Native Americans. This move of the Native Americans only gave America more land and gave the Native Americans less land. Their move also damaged their different tribe by killing an abundance of their people. In conclusion, Jackson’s Native American removal policy was only benificail to Ameriac and not the Native…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays