Preview

Jacksonian Democracy Dbq

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
828 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jacksonian Democracy Dbq
Tyler Ceparano
Coach Bishop
DBQ#3
03/06/2015
Jacksonian Democrats

Jacksonian Democrats were not the "guardians of Democracy" that they claimed to be, but instead were merely guardians of their own sectional interests and Andrew Jackson's inflated ego. Jacksonians were skilled at emotionalizing issues and rallying the support of the South and
West.
The Jacksonian Democrats primary goals were not Constitutional justice and individual liberty, but instead they strived to suppress New England, the Whig party, and business interests and to preserve state's rights. Andrew Jackson (despite allegations to the contrary by South Carolina and Tennessee) was born in North Carolina and grew up a son of the frontier. The hero of the Battle of New
…show more content…
(It should be noted, in fairness to Andrew Jackson, that Webster owed several thousand dollars to the B.U.S.). Still,
Jackson claimed to be protecting the rights of individuals, instead of the interests of Western speculators. Sometimes, however, it was Jackson's ego and not sectional favoritism that drove
Jacksonian democracy. When Chief Justice John Marshall (a Federalist) ruled that the Cherokee nation had a right to its territory, Jackson declared, "Justice Marshall has made his decision now let him enforce it." Jackson claimed that the "common man" wanted the Indians removed and promptly sent the Cherokee down the "Trail of Tears" to Oklahoma. The move was actually fueled by Jackson's dislike for Marshall and his feeling that the executive branch superseded the
Court. Jackson vetoed the Maysville Road project in Kentucky, claiming that the Constitution mandated internal improvements in intra­state areas be the responsibility of local government.
He declined to mention that the road ran through the home district of his archrival, Whig Speaker of the House Henry Clay (Document G). In truth, Jacksonian Democracy did not
…show more content…
Jackson resented upstart South Carolina and John C. Calhoun, due to the Eaton affair. “Resolved, That the legislature of South Carolina, having every confidence in the justice and friendship of the non­slaveholding states…” (Document F) In these Acts and
Resolutions, the legislature of South Carolina asked non­slaveholding states to suppress abolitionist societies and make it illegal to print or distribute information about abolition. South
Carolina warned Congress that if it allowed abolitionist material to be sent through U.S. mail, the state would take measures to prevent that mail from entering or crossing South Carolina. You may recall that in his annual message to Congress in 1835, President Jackson attacked the abolitionists and their incendiary publications. Jackson was an advocate of slavery. The
Cherokees were brutally mistreated by Jackson's removal policy. Irish immigrants were often the victims of big city riots in the East, which Andrew Jackson did nothing to prevent. These injustices were usually concealed from visitors like Harriet Martineau and Alexis De
Tocqueville.

Jacksonian Democracy did little for individual liberty and constitutional justice,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jackson’s presidency also focused on issues of westward expansion. Pursuing paths of “civilization,” Native Americans of the Southeast engaged in extensive agricultural and educational development. But pressure from white settlers and from the state governments proved overwhelming, and Jackson finally supported the forced removal of all southeastern Indians to Oklahoma along the “Trail of Tears.”…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act. According to a page about Andrew Jackson Administration in the Zinn Education Project Cherokee/Seminole Removal Role Play,the Indian Removal Act was a law passed by Jackson forcing Natives to leave their land and move to Oklahoma. The purpose of this law was to get farmers more…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSH DBQ

    • 1423 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When Andrew Jackson was elected into office, fear rang out among the Whigs about Jackson being “King Mob” and that power would be given to uneducated citizens who were part of the “Jacksonians”, this would be proven true, and was crucial to the Jackson administration. These worries were not completely unwarranted, as only a year before Jackson took office, many riots broke out in the eastern cities, in an account of the riots by Phillip Hone, there were several houses torn to the ground and several police officers were wounded in the unusually rowdy city of Philadelphia. (Doc E) These riots proved that America was capable of turning into a ‘mobocracy” gave Andrew Jackson the challenge of reigning in his wild supporters. Although all of these riots were going on, Andrew still wanted to give power to the people and decided to clean house in Washington, which saw the aging politicians get kicked out of office, and brought in people who were simply the highest bidder, or very close friends to someone in the Jackson administration. The control that Jackson gained at the start of his term showed that he could gain power and allowed the commoners to play a bigger role in politics and use this power to control his own people. He protected the rights…

    • 1423 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. In Worcester vs. Georgia set a precedent for Indian rights, Jackson disapproval. He said that chief justice John marshall made his decision now let him enforced it. Jackson claimed that the common man wanted the Indians to be removed and promptly sent the Cherokee down the “trail of tears” to Oklahoma. The move was fueled by jackson’s dislike for marshall and his feeling that executive brand superseded the court.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Jackson did not uphold the Constitution very well. He went against what the Supreme Court said was unconstitutional and force the Cherokee Nation out of their homeland(Doc g). Going against what the Supreme Court gave a message that President Jackson was prepared to do what he wanted to do, whether it was proven wrong or not. President Jackson also vetoed the U.S. Bank charter which was deemed constitutional in the McCulloch v. Maryland hearing of 1819. President Jackson thought that the bank was a monopoly and thought that the shareholders of the bank used the bank the benefit themselves instead of the nation. This decision angered many people, and in Daniel Webster’s reply to President Jackson’s veto (Doc. C), Webster states “It manifestly seeks to inflame the poor against the rich; it wantonly attacks whole classes of people, for the purpose of turning against them the prejudices and the resentment of other classes.” Webster thought that Jackson’s veto was a way to get the economic classes to clash together. He blames Jackson that he is trying to separate the country. Webster also states that the veto “extends the grasp of executive pretension over every power of the government.” implying that Jackson thinks that he can overpower any form of the government or any…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Jacksonian era there were many different views on the rights and wrongs of the presidential actions. The Jacksonians thought themselves to be guardians of individual liberty, political democracy, the United States Constitution and the equality of economic opportunity. This in many cases can be argued that the Jacksonians were successful guardians of these four things.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Jackson was the one who made this removal. He called it the Indian Removal. In 1830, the Indian Removal act was signed. Native Americans were forced to leave their lands. The Choctaw was the first one forced to leave. Thousands of people died. The removal kept on going.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jackson went as far as trying to justifying the evil action before Congress. What was the argument for kicking 100,000 people off their land other than their skin color? None, Jackson's argument showed the racism and white nationalism that began to take hold of the United States starting with the Trail of Tears.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson Dbq

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout the Jacksonian era the Jacksonians proved to be violators of the United States Constitution and not the guardians they believed themselves to be. Both the Jacksonians and President Jackson went against the Supreme Courts regarding cases that were said to be constitutional. An instance in which the Jacksonian Democrats violated the Constitution was in the "Trail of Tears". The Supreme Court stated that the Jacksonian Democrats' actions were unconstitutional because they had issued the "Indian Removal Act". By doing this, they were in violation of the treaty of New Echota. In the 1832 decision Worcester v. Georgia, Chief Justice Marshall ruled that the Cherokees had their own land and that they did not need to follow Georgia law in their own territory. This ruling of the Supreme Court did not stop Jacksonians from driving the Cherokees off of their land. Jackson used the Constitution to benefit himself when he vetoed the national bank, even after the Supreme Court had already ruled that the bank was constitutional. When South Carolina declared a reduced tariff void and threatened to secede, President Jackson responded in an unconstitutionally. He threatened to send militia to enforce the tariff and the Jacksonian Congress passed a bill approving this military force, if necessary. This was in direct violation of the Constitution. They continued to violate the Constitution by placing censors on the mail and intercepting abolitionist literature or mail into or from the south. This was an infringement on the Constitution because it violated the first amendment.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson became the president of the United States in 1828 and was the country’s leading democrat. Democracy during this time had not yet embraced all Americans, excluding women, African Americans, and Indians (Keene, 226). Jackson and his supporters desired to limit the rights of blacks by basically stripping them of their suffrage. Many states expanded suffrage for white men by removing property requirements, while others were imposing new constrictions on blacks, such as high property requirements, therefore stripping them of their right to vote. This racial exclusion limited African American votes throughout the North and West in states such as Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, and most all states that entered the Union after 1819 (Keene, 241). Many states such as Indiana, Illinois, and Ohio regulated the conduct of free blacks by requiring those who emigrated in the state to post a bond (much like a prisoner) or be deported, or by prohibiting them from testifying in court or bringing civil suits (Keene,241). Jackson’s contact with Indians, while including them into his vision of white man’s democracy, proved to have extreme consequences as well. Jackson’s vision was to expand the lands of the white settlers’ and it proved to have no room for the respect of Indians’ rights. Jackson and his supporters desired to constrict Indian’s rights, and to take away their lands for the purpose of westward expansion. Although president Jackson treated the natives as inferior subjects to white men as himself, the Cherokees, one of the “Five Civilized Tribes,” chose to obey his wishes and assimilate, rather than to resist. A conflict arose between the Cherokees and the state of Georgia, their white neighbors, over whether the Cherokees could declare themselves an independent nation or not. However,…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Jackson is quoted as saying, “John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it.” This was referring to the court case known as Worcester vs Georgia in which supreme court justice John Marshall ruled that it was unconstitutional for Georgia to oppress the rights of the Cherokee Indians and to obtain their land or political dominion over it. After this ruling Jackson proceeded with the removal of the Cherokee Indians even though it was deemed illegal and…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Jefferson

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jackson also helped to change the way our presidential candidates from each party are chosen. He felt that before the change, when they were picked by congressional caucus, it showed favoritism toward the wealthy male because that was the stereotypical image of power back then. In order to make it more fair for the people, Jackson came up with the idea of having political conventions for each party, which is the system that is still in place today. Jackson felt that by doing it this way and holding a convention for the people that the “power would arise directly from the people, not from the aristocratic political institutions such as the caucus.” By using the Spoils System and coming up with holding political conventions it did just as Jackson had hoped and it “did serve to limit the power of the two entrenched elites-permanent officeholders and the exclusive party caucus.”…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Century of Dishonor

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jackson’s included how the Indian’s could not receive citizenship in the United States. Jackson shares that it is very important to grant the Indian’s citizenship. The government grants everyone the right’s of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Without citizenship the Indians will not have this. I believe this point is proven by the line that states “so long as they are not citizens of the United States, their rights of property must remain insecure of invasion.”…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian removal had profound consequences, one of which was the strengthening of Jackson’s reputation as an enemy of the rule of law. Jackson was known as a friend of local “democratic” solutions and it reaffirmed the link between racism and white democracy in the South. It also showed Jackson’s commitment to state sovereignty and limited…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article of “Andrew Jackson versus the Cherokee,” Andrew Jackson wasn’t love by the Indians at all; in fact he hated the Indians because the Indians are getting support and protected by the Supreme Court. In this article, Robert V. Remini says, “Chief Justice John Marshall handed down his decision on March 18, 1831… but he also rejected Jackson’s claim that they were subject to state law” (355). Jackson’s claim is that the Indians are relying on the Supreme Court more than themselves, which is why Jackson dislike people who is getting depended on instead of taking care of themselves. However, the Indian does not like Jackson too. The main reasons the Indians do not like Jackson is because he had taken their land and causes many Indians…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays