Preview

Income tax

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
929 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Income tax
Question 14-4
Internal Revenue Code Section 351 permits shareholders of a corporation to defer recognition of a gain or loss on the transfer of assets to the corporation. The transfer of property may be made when a new corporation is formed or may reflect additional capital contributions to an existing corporation. Without Section 351, a sole proprietorship or a partnership would have difficulty adopting the corporate form of organization for legal and/or tax purposes because the transfer of appreciated property would constitute a taxable transaction in a recognized gain. The deferral of gain or loss under Section 351 can be justified because the assets have merely been transferred to a corporation that is controlled by the transferors. Section 351 also prevents the recognition of losses on transfers of property that has declined in value.
Question 14-20
According to Publication 538:
S Corporations, all Partnerships, Limited Liability Companies/Partnerships are required to use a calendar year. These pass-through entities can make an election to file on a fiscal year if they meet certain requirements. In almost cases, these entities are on a calendar year basis.
C Corporations can pick up any month end for their tax year.
Question 14-22
Corporations can claim capital losses only against capital gains. In other words, if a corporation has an excess capital loss, it cannot deduct the loss in the current tax year. Instead, it carries the loss to other tax years and deducts it from any net capital gains that occur in those years. A capital loss is carried to other years in the following order.
3 years prior to the loss year.
2 years prior to the loss year.
1 year prior to the loss year. Disallowed capital losses can be carried back 3 years and forward 5 years. For individuals capital losses are treated as deduction for a loss on dispositions of stock; gains on sale remain capital gains. Lastly, Code Sec. 1202 allows non-corporate taxpayers to exclude 50

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    case has been utilized in number of court cases. In some instances this narrow application of capital asset status has assisted the defendant in achieving their desired results and in other cases the courts have found the ruling to be inapplicable, contradictory to the defendant’s argument, or in need of further refinement. One such case where the Corn Product case was noted is Campbell Taggart, Inc. v. U.S. In this case, Campbell Targgart Inc. (CTI) was attempting to claim ordinary losses on the sale of stock in a Spanish corporation known as Superdescuento Uno, Dos, Tres, S.A. (Supermarkets) (American Federal Tax Reports , 1984). The Commissioner of Internal Revenue disallowed the deduction on the grounds that the loss should have been classified as a capital loss. As discussed in the reading, stock is typically classified as a capital asset. Specifically, even when the stock ownership is utilized as a means to facilitate everyday operations of the business, since it still holds a “substantial investment motive”, it needs to be classified as a capital asset (escaping the span of the Corn Products Refining Co.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ac553 Wk4 Assignment

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Unlike individuals, corporations may not take a deduction for net capital losses in the year in which they occur. The net capital loss can never be used to reduce ordinary income. Corporate taxpayers can claim capital losses only against capital gains. Individuals may claim up to $3,000 in capital losses against other forms of income. Corporate capital loss carryovers become short-term losses regardless of their original status, and they are carried back three years, forward five years…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Suspended losses are created when losses from passive activities exceed income from passive activities in a tax year. Those excess losses are "suspended" (i.e. disallowed and carried forward to a future date). Those losses can be deducted against future income from passive activities and can be deducted in their entirely when the activity that created the suspended loss is disposed of in a fully taxable disposition. ¶7215…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    §1244: Permits ordinary loss on worthless stock of small business corp. (5,000 single, 100,000 married; stock losses status after sale or donation)…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Under Reg 1.165-1, only a bona fide loss is allowed. “Substance not mere form shall govern in determining a deductible loss.”…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 5: Homework

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Corporations may claim capital losses against their capital gains. Net capital losses can be carried back three preceding tax years to offset capital gains in those years. If some loss remains, then it is carried forward for period of five tax years. Unused losses at the end of the five-year period are lost forever.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because litigation is unpredictable and complex, M Corporation should not accrue a liability on the 2007 financial statements. Management determined a loss was probable and estimated the loss to be in the range of $15-20 million with $17 million being the most likely amount of loss. According to FASB Codification 450-20-25-6, losses that are reasonably estimable shall not be accrued because the losses relate to a future period rather than current or prior period. Also, per FASB Codification 450-20-25-8, general or unspecified business risks do not meet the conditions for accrual in 450-20-25-2, so no accrual for a future loss will be made. Additionally, Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, volume 15, issue 2, article 3, states that 64% of SEC registrants sampled reported being sued, only 9.5% of them accrued any liability for pending…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ACCT101

    • 753 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Prepare revised income statements according to generally accepted accounting principles, beginning with income from continuing operations before income taxes. Ignore EPS disclosures.…

    • 753 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, ASC 450-20-25-2 shows that “An estimated loss from a loss contingency shall be accrued by a charge to income if both of the following conditions are met: a. Information available before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued indicates that it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred at the date of the financial statements. Date of the financial statements means the end of the most recent accounting period for which financial statements are being presented. It is implicit in this condition that it must be probable that one or more future events will occur confirming the fact of the loss. b. The amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.” Therefore, they should disclose the most likely amount of loss which is $17 million as a liability.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the auditor of Mother Ltd. (Mother), you have been asked to draft a memorandum to the president to explain the future deductibility of loss carryovers of a wholly-owned subsidiary, Childco Ltd. (Childco). Mother acquired Childco on January 1, 2011 when Childco was experiencing financial difficulties. Childco manufactures paper products, whereas Mother is a wholesaler of office supplies and equipment. Both companies are Canadian-controlled private corporations and have December 31 year ends. Mother is very unsure about Childco future and may stop funding Childco if Mother gets fedup.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    gfsdf

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Earning subject to social security portion: 110,100 - 97,350 = 12,750 > 8,770 therefore all of the net earnings from self-employment income is subject to the social security portion of the self-employment tax…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Income Tax

    • 17048 Words
    • 69 Pages

    Written by: Bhavin Pathak (Student, CA-IPCC, BN-14, Arihant Inst. Pvt. Ltd.) Special thanks to: CA Sunil Sanghvi, CA Sunil Jain…

    • 17048 Words
    • 69 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Income Tax

    • 4860 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Income tax levels in India were very high during 1950-1980, in 1970-71 there were 11 tax slabs with highest tax rate being 93.5% including surcharges. In 1973-74 highest rate was 97.5%. But to reduce tax evasion tax rates were reduced later on, by "1992-93" maximum tax rates were reduced to 40%. [2][3]…

    • 4860 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Notes on Philippine Taxation

    • 2458 Words
    • 10 Pages

    3. Transfer tax is the right to make casual and gratuitous transfer of one 's property to the…

    • 2458 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Income Tax

    • 7277 Words
    • 30 Pages

    INTRODUCTION HISTORY OF INCOME-TAX: 1. India’ trust with income tax dates back to 1859 when James Wilson, Finance member in the Council of India, came to the country to establish the tax structure, a new paper currency and to remodel the finance system. 2. A bill imposing tax on profits from property, professions, trades and offices was passed by the Legislative Council of India. It received the assent of the Governor General on July 24, 1860. Lord Canning was the Governor General during 1856-58 and became Viceroy in 1858 till 1862. 3. Direct tax revenue of ` 1.35 crore was raised in 1860-61. The government’s direct tax revenue was around ` 4,50,000 crore in 2010-11. 4. The contribution of direct taxes to the GDP increased from 1.9% in 1860-61 to 6.1% in 2009-10. 5. The current tax law was passed in 1961. It is amended every year through the Finance Acts. A series of amendments had rendered the Act almost incomprehensible. 6. The exercise to simplify the Act began in 1986 when the then Prime Minister, Shri Rajiv Gandhi tasked senior Supreme Court lawyer, Dinesh Vyas to work on a new law. 7. The exercise of redrafting the law was initiated only in 1996 when a group was formed by the then Finance Minister, Shri P Chidambaram. 8. The group submitted its report in 1997, but the process got stalled again due to change in government. 9. The idea was revived again when Mr. Chidambaram returned as the finance minister of UPA government’s first innings in 2004. 10. In August 2009, Finance Minister, Mr. Mukherjee put out a discussion paper. 11. The current bill is an outcome of the discussion initiated through that paper. TAX BUOYANCY: It is defined as the percentage change in tax revenues divided by the percentage change in GDP. ASSESSMENT YEAR [Sec. 2(9)]: “Assessment year” means the period starting from April 1 and ending on March 31 of the next year. For instance, the assessment year 2012-13 which commenced…

    • 7277 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics