Preview

Human Nature - Are Humans Naturally Good or Evil?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1497 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Human Nature - Are Humans Naturally Good or Evil?
What is thought of as immoral to one person can be seen as ethical to another, and vice versa. This is due to the difference in the way humans perceive things, which is part of the intricacy of mankind. "During the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that conditions called war; and such a war, as if of every man, against every man." (Hobbes) Hobbes states that Humans are naturally evil and need a powerful government to control them. Is it true? Rousseau thinks otherwise. "In reasoning on the principles he (Thomas Hobbes) lays down, he ought to have said that the state of nature, being that in which the care for our own preservation is the least prejudicial to that of others, was consequently the best calculated to promote peace, and the most suitable for mankind… man in the state of nature is both strong and dependent involves two contrary suppositions. Man is weak when he is dependent, and is his own master before he comes to be strong." (Rousseau) The issue of good and evil is brought up in "Lord of the Flies" by William Golding, when innocent boys find themselves on a deserted island attempting to create a society similar to ours. What circumstances occur to them? How do past influences affect them? Are their actions good or evil? The actions of the boys were not a matter of being good or evil, but were actions for survival. A person's environment does not draw him towards good or evil, nor is he or she born with it inside. Humans have instincts that are not affairs of good and evil, but of survival. By natural instinct, humans will do what is best for them especially for their survival. Animals, much like people, kill when in need. For instance, if they feel they are cornered, they would attack. If they need food, they will kill to eat. In "Lord of the Flies", Ralph was being hunted by Jack's tribe, and in a desperate attempt in his defense, thrusts his spear through a crack at the inspecting savages. Ralph attacked

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Throughout human history, the issue of power has been the source of countless wars and violence, and so has it sparked inspiration in many philosophers to develop potentially better systems of government. The Age of Enlightenment saw many philosophers sprout with new ideas on forms of government to replace or refine the archaic norm of absolute monarchy; one such controversial thinker was Thomas Hobbes. In his widely-recognized book, The Leviathan, he claimed that, because human beings are naturally selfish and evil, one must cede his or her rights to the absolute monarch so that peace can be established and maintained. However, if all human beings are cruel, then monarchs are not any different from the evil of those he rules. In William Golding’s 1954 novel The Lord of the Flies, Golding reflects Hobbes’ ideas about human nature as he depicts the governing of a cluster of stranded boys on an island, from the lack of cohesion of Ralph’s attempt to rationally lead them back to civilization, to Jack’s manipulation of the children into savagery. William Golding thus qualifies Thomas Hobbes’ position, supporting that humans are naturally selfish and evil but refuting his claim that an absolute ruler would make “wise” decisions through his illustration of Jack’s greed for power, hostile acts to Ralph and Piggy, and manipulation of his followers.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They argue that no matter the situation, evildoers have always had the capacity to do evil. John Lockem author of The Second Treatise of Civil Government suggests “The freedom then of man, and liberty of acting according to his own will, is grounded on his having reason, which is able to instruct him in that law he is to govern himself by, and make him know how far he is left to freedom of his own will.” This simply means that we all have the ability to do whatever we want, sometimes we just make the wrong choices. But, in The Lord of the Flies it was made obvious that the lack of authority and order in the novel is was caused their “society” to deteriorate.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Rousseau, there are some good things in civilization but there are negatives that come with it. This correlates to his famed quote “A man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains”. This can be interpreted as people are born free, but they are chained by the societies that they live in. People believe they live above society’s standards but it is society themselves who reminds people that you always seek approval from them and always conform to their beliefs, therefore it makes us a slave to societies standards. Even the people who enforce society’s standards and think they are the perfect example for society also show that they are a bigger slave than to those who are trying to seek the approval of society. Rousseau's main argument is that the main cause for all of human nature's problem is not 'sin' but separation from 'Nature.' He believed that Nature has always been kind to man and only when he separates himself from Nature that he degenerates both physically and morally. This is in direct contrast to Hobbes' views that man is fundamentally…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the central themes in both William Golding’s ‘Lord of the Flies’ and Dennis Kelly’s ‘DNA’ is good and evil; both texts collectively offering a plethora of theories and ideas about the morals of humans and how they influence their actions. In ‘Lord of the Flies’ a group of British schoolboys are stranded on an island. Far away from the influence of adults, Golding creates a pseudo-civilisation in which he examines the actions of human beings and conveys his ideas of good and evil to the reader. Conversely, ‘DNA’ focuses on a group of twenty- first century teens, (still among a society) where their actions face physical consequences, who attempt to cover up a crime committed by their peers. Kelly, like Golding, addresses the universal morals of humanity, yet seems to be more questioning than axiomatic and certain about the nature of man and whether humans can be explicitly categorised into ‘good’ and ‘evil’. Both texts present the idea that there is both good and evil in the world. Golding demonstrates a clear segregation between characters that are ‘good’ and characters that are ‘evil’ and Kelly voices the opinion that the majority of humans have both of these traits installed in them. Although set in different time periods, the texts explore the fundamental ideas of ‘good’ and ‘evil’ in children and youths and whether this is fatalistically inherited or whether we act in the way we do as a result of situationism.…

    • 3707 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people, like Mr. Golding believe that everyone is born with the potential ability to do evil, thus coming from our genes and hereditary implications. While on the other hand, Mr. Rousseau, who I agree with, believes that it is the environment around us that more determines our willingness to do evil or not.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike Thomas Hobbes, who believed humans were naturally evil, Jean Rousseau believed that humans are born, neither good nor bad, thus corruption or goodness is taught from the society. For example, when children are born, everything they…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "Kill the pig! Cut his throat! Bash him in!'" The pig hunts are used throughout “Lord of the Flies” to show the gradual inheritance of the evil within the boys. One of he main characters who depicts the idea of savagery is Jack who is charismatic and unlike Ralph, he gets off on power and abuses his position above others. Ralph is keen on getting home as soon as possible and says, “Look, as much fun as it would be to run around killing each other, let’s build a signal fire already and get off this island.”…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human nature is a topic that has been discussed for a long time now, so there is no exact answer to if we are good, evil or something of a completely different nature. In my opinion, I believe that we are not evil or good, but rather something that's a combination of both.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LOTF

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Human nature: a concept so intricate and esoteric that it has caused bewilderment in the minds of the most intelligent men to have walked on earth. Morality- an important component of human nature- is the ability to choose between right or wrong. Tracing back to our roots, Adam and Eve`s act of disobedience, it is evident that since the beginning of times man has chosen to do wrong, showing that human nature is bad. Still, some insist of its being good, like Socrates, a Greek philosopher, who argued that ``it is impossible for a human being to willingly do wrong because their instinct for self interest prevents them from doing so``. Nevertheless, looking at tragedies like the Holocaust or World War II, one has reasons to believe that man is definitely wicked and evil. William Golding begs to differ and believes that although man is indeed bad, he is also capable of good. His allegorical novel, Lord of the Flies, scrutinizes our iniquitous human nature and reveals mankind`s true potential for evil, acknowledging, however, that good could be found in the most remote areas of man.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    James Oliver Curwood once said, “In every man’s heart there is a devil, but we do not know the man is bad until the devil is roused.” In Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, a group of schoolboys are stranded on an island after their plane crashes. Ralph becomes the leader of the boys and tries to maintain civilization on the island. In order to maintain a civilization there must be authority, hope, and intelligence. On the island, these aspects begin to break down and disintegrate quickly when human nature takes over causing civilization to fail. Consequently, many of the boys become savages and fight amongst themselves. The Lord of the Flies implies that all humans are born evil, but clearly not everyone acts in an evil manner. Golding suggests that the laws and norms of society restrain humans’ innate evil, and, if these laws are not reinforced, then man’s evil nature emerges.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Evil” – defined by Dictionary.com as “morally wrong or bad; immoral; harmful; characterized by misfortune or suffering” (“Evil”) – is a very complicated topic few people can fully agree on. The view on whether people are born evil or are raised to be evil is highly subjective. What some people consider to be evil, others might believe to be valiant. Although researchers have been exploring many different viewpoints to find the correct answer to this controversy, their results insinuate that evil is found in the eye of the beholder. However, with some of the world’s greatest reprobates nominated for Nobel Peace Prizes and others been given the key to a city, it can be derived that a person develops evil impulses…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Humans are always, by natural instinct, going to do what is best for them and their survival. Animals, much like men, kill when in need. For instance, when they feel they are backed into a corner, they will attack, and when they need food, they will kill to eat. In Lord of the Flies, Ralph was being hunted by Jack's tribe, and in a desperate attempt in his defense, he thrust his spear through a crack at the inspecting savages. Ralph attacked someone of his own kind for his own survival. It can be believed that man is the derivative of others animals, and as such, they have certain instincts that were instilled from birth. The boys on the island later began to resemble the behavior of animals. "At once the crowd surged after it, poured down the rock, leapt on to the beast, screamed, struck, bit, tore. There were no words, and no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws" (153). William Golding's description of this scene leads a reader to believe that these boys took on animal like qualities. What kind of human tears with teeth and claws? The boys mistake Simon for their beast and result in ruthlessly killing him. In their state of mind of savagery and hunting, they saw themselves in danger of this "beast" and their first instinct was to kill anything in…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality is personal or cultural values, codes of conduct, and social principles that determine right and wrong in the human society. Philosopher Thomas Hobbes Believes that Everyone is a savage without law or morality, and that there are good men only because of society, without society everyone would be savage. while Jean-Jacques Rousseau believes that humans are innately noble savages. The two different ideas these philosophers have about morality and what makes a person moral leads us to ask; what causes humans to abandon moral behavior? In the book, Lord of the Flies, author William Golding uses many characters and motifs such as jack, Roger, and fear to show how morality can be abandoned.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is a book that describes human nature and shows what happens when a group of boys are isolated and have everything taken away from them. They resort back to their true human nature. At first, the boys try and keep their normal routines and live according to what they used to do. But…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    We think of a person that is evil to be bad, although without the presences of a higher figure or rule are people naturally good or naturally evil? What would happen to a people or person that was in a situation where all forms of authority were removed. Would such person remain the way they are, or would they become savage and completely forget what it’s like when there are restrictions. In the book The Lord of The Flies, the author takes the side that people are naturally evil. In a nutshell, the book is about a group of boy’s crash landing on an island and trying to survive until they are able to be saved. As time progresses there is a clear change in the boy's actions. They become more savage like as if they were animals, the boys had completely forgotten about what it meant to be human or civil. The author is showing what he thinks would happen to kids without a figure of power or rules. Without the presences of a higher figure or rules. people are naturally evil, as time goes on in the story…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays