Preview

How Far Did Essex Cause His Own Downfall?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
758 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Far Did Essex Cause His Own Downfall?
In 1600 Essex's source of income (the monopoly) was not renewed and his attitude shifted from sorrow to rage and rebellion when his freedom from going behind Elizabeth's back to go to war was granted. His power at court was weakened when he led an unsuccessful rebellion in 1601 where he rebelled against Elizabeth and the court faction - led by Robert Cecil - to gain further influence and control at court. These sources suggests the Earl of Essex caused his own downfall.

Source 10 suggests that Elizabeth had a decent relationship with Essex as she gave him "£4,000 to clear" his "debt". This questions how he came into debt. She understands why Essex was acting like a child; he didn't want to grow up. She says that her "hand shall be readier to help" him "than any other". She told him to be "wise to help yourself" and not to give his "enemies advantage". This is a system of patronage. By "enemies", she …show more content…
This source was written by Elizabeth herself to Essex in 1594, five or six years before the rebellion and his downfall had not been complete yet. However, he started to rebel long before that. This was because he was used to the way Elizabeth spoilt him like he was her child. Source 11, written by Sir Robert Naunton in 1641, tells us that if they had a more "proper conduct" - if they maintained a professional relationship - he might not have rebelled. Their affection would also not be "so hot and cold". This means that they had many arguments and falling outs which could be a reason why he started to rebel. In addition to this view, Essex's response in Source 12 at the time of his death was that he "never had any treacherous intentions towards Her Majesty". This makes me consider whether he was lying about that as his and Elizabeth's affection was hot and cold (as it says in source 11), where they had lots of arguments. Possibly Essex could not have his way and that is
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Narrative Essay- the Crucible Abigail Williams
    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Narrative Essay- the Crucible Abigail Williams

    I hate Elizabeth by heart. I am calling for revenge, oh God please hear me. And if God is not willing to fulfill my desire I will have to use other aid.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Richard and the Battle of Bosworth Essay Example
    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Richard and the Battle of Bosworth Essay Example

    On 22nd August 1485, King Richard III lost the Battle of Bosworth to Henry Tudor. One of the main reasons for him losing was due to his unpopularity with the people and his nobles. Richard was disliked by many of his nobles because he gave power to nobles from the north, which he knew, annoying the nobility in the south of England. This meant that in the battle he had little support, and some of his nobles, such as the Stanley’s fought for Henry. Richard was also disliked by the people of England. He seized the crown in 1483, and rumours spread that he killed his two nephews. This made him disliked, and few people supported him.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain why Edward IV's death opened a bitter power struggle in 1483
    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain why Edward IV's death opened a bitter power struggle in 1483

    After Edward IV died in 1483, a dispute began between to major factions – the Woodvilles and Richard of Gloucester. The Woodvilles were the family of Elizabeth Woodville, Edward’s wife, with whom he shared many children. Edward V, the heir to the throne, was the son of Elizabeth Woodville, and so this put them in a good position. However, Richard of Gloucester was Edward’s brother and had shown himself to be a very useful and successful man to Edward during his reign. They both had their various strengths and weaknesses, and they both wanted the same thing. Control of England.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In the Content of the Period 1485-1587, to What Extent Did the Northern Rebellion of 1569 Represent a Significant Threat to the Security of the Tudor State
    • 3209 Words
    • 13 Pages

    In the Content of the Period 1485-1587, to What Extent Did the Northern Rebellion of 1569 Represent a Significant Threat to the Security of the Tudor State

    Rebellions caused a serious threat to monarchs; and as a result of the War of The Roses and Henry VII’s usurpation in 1485, the Tudor Dynasty had effectively been founded on Rebellion so it may be possible to assume that the Tudor Dynasty could be removed by rebellion. The Tudor period can be seen as a time of unrest as each Tudor monarch had at least one rebellion during their reign. The majority of the Tudor rebellions were a significant threat as they attacked the authority of the Crown; suggesting a period of instability throughout the 100 years as each rebellion was a constant reminder of the fragile position of the monarchs during this time. For Henry VIII this can be illustrated by the Lincolnshire rising and the Pilgrimage of Grace in 1536-7 as the commons were driven to rebel. The same can be said for the Western Rebellion during the reign of Edward VI at a time when the Crown was vulnerable due to the King’s young age and lack of experience. Further still, Elizabeth encountered a situation which threatened her position as monarch during the Northern Rebellion of 1569, when people were reluctant to accept her as the rightful ruler and she faced further threats due to the situation abroad and in her attempts for religious change; thus making her position vulnerable. In addition, Elizabeth I faced hostility from others who were against her views such as in the Babington Plot which was a last attempt to create a rebellion against Elizabeth in support of Mary Queens of Scots. Moreover, within these rebellions there were factors that caused a great deal of danger to the overall security of the Tudor state. The nature of the rebellion, whether it be political, economic or religious played a large role in the protection of the Tudor state. Rebellions such as the Cornish rebellion in 1497 had begun due to…

    • 3209 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    How Did Edward III Overcome The Challenges To His Rule
    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages

    How Did Edward III Overcome The Challenges To His Rule

    In 1470 Edward IV’s rule was challenged by the former monarch that he had usurped, Henry VI, and one of the key reasons as to why he was able to overcome this challenge was due to his popularity as king. Edward had proved to be an able king who was also young, strong and handsome, which is severely juxtaposed to the monarch he had usurped, as Henry VI was old, a less than capable ruler and thought to be insane. This meant that not only his original usurpation of Henry in 1461 was considered more acceptable to England’s population as it was most likely going to better the country; it also meant that Henry’s usurpation of Edward in 1470 was especially unfavourable with the population. Another reason why Edward was able to overcome his challenge of usurpation was at that time France was very unpopular with England, which is unsurprising as it is said that ‘England’s national hobby was going to war with France’, and Henry VI’s wife, Margaret of Anjou was the French kings niece. This marriage alone would be enough to make Edward appear more favourable with the general population; however it seemed likely that if Edward had not usurped, an alliance between the two countries would proceed, which only served to support Edward’s campaign to get back on the throne. Nonetheless, the most damaging factor to the position of the opposition is most likely the circumstances that the Lancastrian house found themselves in as with the deaths of both their key supporter, the Earl of Warwick, at the Battle of Barnet and of the Lancastrian heir, Edward, Prince of Wales at Tewkesbury, the Lancastrian position was no longer considered viable. The popularity of Edward IV was not repeated with Richard III however, and this combined with the fact he usurped a king that was showing great…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Boston Tea Rebellion Research Paper
    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Boston Tea Rebellion Research Paper

    he primary reason was due to the Stamp Tax, which placed a tax on everyday consumer goods. Colonists by this time had been in the colonies in many cases for 2 generations, so many had never set foot in England. The idea that they had colonized the land and were producing much of England's raw resources, yet did not have representation in the House of Lords or House of Commons to protest taxation lead to the revolt. "Taxation without Representation" was the main issue. The tipping point came when tea, a popular drink of the time, was taxed. The East Indian Company controlled the tea market. From what I've read, they were given a lot of support from the British government and were able to deliver tea to the docks in the colonies avoiding some of the taxes other…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To what extent was Elizabeth s foreign policy between 1588 and 1603 an expensive failure
    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To what extent was Elizabeth s foreign policy between 1588 and 1603 an expensive failure

    To what extent was Elizabeth’s foreign policy between 1588 and 1603 an expensive failure? (45 marks)…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Does Elizabeth Proctor Change In The Crucible
    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Does Elizabeth Proctor Change In The Crucible

    In the beginning of the play, Elizabeth has a tense, distant relationship with her husband because he had an affair with Abigail Williams, who is both the Proctors’ antagonist and uses pathos to cause strife between them. Elizabeth still had not been able to forgive John for this, causing their relationship to suffer. However, the accusations brought against them by Abigail force Elizabeth and John to pull together and unite against their accusers. She is able to move past John’s sin when saying, “John, it come to naught that I should forgive you, if you’ll not forgive yourself” (Miller 138). Elizabeth is able to let John know that she does not hold his sin against him anymore, and he should not as well. Elizabeth also changes from being an incredibly truthful person to one that is willing to lie to save her husband. When John is accused, he tells the court that he has committed adultery with Abigail, and this is why Abigail is accusing him. However, the court does not believe him, so John has Elizabeth brought out to prove to the court that her husband did indeed have an affair. Since Elizabeth has never lied before in her life,…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crucible Questions Complex All Acts
    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Crucible Questions Complex All Acts

    7. What is learned of the relationship between Elizabeth and John from the opening dialogue and stage action of Act 2?…

    • 533 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Salem Witch Hunt: Is Elizabeth Innocent?
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Salem Witch Hunt: Is Elizabeth Innocent?

    John and Elizabeth have fights in which she starts that make her look even more suspicious. Elizabeth keeps bringing up the affair between John and Abigail showing that she is still mad at both of them. “You were alone with her?”(Miller 27). Elizabeth tells John he should be the one who goes to salem. She tells him to do that so that she doesn’t have to go and risk being convicted. This makes Elizabeth very selfish and mistrusting proving that she is the catalyst.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Elizabeth Proctor In The Crucible '
    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Elizabeth Proctor In The Crucible '

    In act four when John and Elizabeth are talking the morning John is scheduled to hang it is clear to see that it is physically and emotionally hard for Elizabeth to see her husband like this. It is hard for her to not tell John, her husband and the man she loves deeply, to just give them what they want to hear to be able to come home with her. The amount of faith that Elizabeth held even when things where falling apart displayed her loyalty to her religion and to her husband. Upon finding out about John and Abigail there were sore feeling and jealousy, but she stayed with him, and she kept his name clean in the village. Although it was hard for Elizabeth and John to move on from their struggles they managed to do so by helping and staying loyal to one…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Elizabeth Proctor Sacrifice In The Crucible
    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Elizabeth Proctor Sacrifice In The Crucible

    When she first found out about the affair, she made John feel the guilt of the affair every day; but in the end she admits that deep within herself she knew all along that John’s affair with Abigail wasn’t completely his fault, and that she ‘kept a cold house.’ She does not just blame him for their marriage going wrong as she seemed to do earlier in the play, but instead she admits she is also capable of self-criticism. When she admitted this, she showed her loyalty and love for John, ultimately making up for treating him badly in the beginning of the play. An admirable character always ends up doing something good that overcomes the evil that the character previously exerted. I believe Elizabeth truly was able to overcome her anger and was able to make up for all her sins at the end of the play, thus making her one of the most admirable characters in the…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is Friar Lawrence Guilty for the Untimely Death of Romeo and Juliet?
    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Is Friar Lawrence Guilty for the Untimely Death of Romeo and Juliet?

    Shakespeare's presentation of Friar Lawrence has meant that audiences are reluctant to blame him for what happens to Romeo and Juliet. How far do you agree?…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Crucible Forgiving Quotes
    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Crucible Forgiving Quotes

    Elizabeth’s motivation for action is the affair between Abigail and John. This can be justified when Goody Proctor says, “John, if it were not Abigail that you must go to hurt, would you falter now? I think not”(54). In this moment she is asking John to go and inform the court officials that Abigail is lying. John refuses to go in and turn Abigail in. The quote is Elizabeth telling John that he would turn in anyone else but since it is Abigail, he doesn’t want to turn her in. John claims the reason he can’t turn Abby in is that nobody would believe him. This shows the relationship is still tense and Elizabeth hasn’t truly forgiven John.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    By 1571, to what extent had Elizabeth I solved most of her internal and external problems?
    • 2462 Words
    • 6 Pages

    By 1571, to what extent had Elizabeth I solved most of her internal and external problems?

    The first major internal problem faced by Elizabeth at the start of her reign was her gender. The idea of a female monarch met hostility in Tudor England and Elizabeth was faced with criticism by the Protestant preacher John Knox who wrote ‘to promote a woman to bear rule, superiority, dominion, or empire above any realm, nation or city is repugnant by nature and a insult to God.’ However Elizabeth overcame the issue of her gender in her appointment of administrators and management of political matters. Immediately after coming to the throne, Elizabeth successfully established her royal and political authority by appointing William Cecil as her principle secretary, a successful partnership in government which lasted 40 years. Elizabeth then appointed Thomas Parry as controller of the household and Robert Dudley as Master of the Horse. The appointment of her friends and supporters highlight that Elizabeth overcame her internal problem of her gender as Elizabeth had successfully established her authority, despite being a female queen she was supported…

    • 2462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics