Preview

How Did Nietzsche's View On Religion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
831 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Nietzsche's View On Religion
Friedrich Nietzsche and Karl Marx were intellectuals with vastly different world views and opinions on how things should be run but the one matter in which they would both agree leaves a bad taste in their mouths is Christianity. Nietzsche see Christianity as a blight upon humans, something holding us back from our fullest potential. Karl Marx does not necessarily see Christianity as the great evil that Nietzsche makes it out to be, but he would agree that complicated monolith that is Christianity is holding us back. Both individuals want Christianity gone, but their reasoning and purposes behind make this mutual desire a little less mutual. Friedrich Nietzsche makes it fairly obvious from his book “Twilight of the Idols” that he shares no deep love for religion but the religion he seems to harbor the most hate for is Christianity. He believes that Christianity itself wages a war on …show more content…
He says this in response to the Church teaching that one should remove passion and desires from one’s life so that they are not tempted by them. As the quote makes obvious, Nietzsche firmly disagrees. But Nietzsche is not advocating for the indulgence of desire and passion. He thinks this “eradication”, as he puts it, of passion is only feeding into people that were too weak willed to resist this temptation to begin with and it would not be needed if they were stronger. (26, Twilight of the Idols) Another teaching Christianity attempts to teach, that Nietzsche firmly disagrees with, is peace with one another and having a good conscience. Nietzsche believes this peace people are trying to find merely weakens them and having enemies is actually good, not only for the individual but also the state and he even goes so far as to say “One has relinquished great life when one relinquishes war.”(Twilight of the Idols,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    He also says that the war is a form of cultural genocide where everything is being destroyed and…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm, Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Edited by Rolf-Peter Horstmann, Judith Norman; translated by Judith Norman. Cambridge University Press, 2002.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He taught as follows: Christians can no more take neutral…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eng103 1ST Essay

    • 1310 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is quite obvious that Nietzsche strongly believed that Christianity has nonetheless, demean our human rights by being one of the “founding fathers” of morality. Nietzsche claimed that morality is anti-nature, thus the creator of such a “self-torturing” principle, that…

    • 1310 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ap dbq 1

    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Doc. 1, selection from the Confucian Analects: It is saying that at times war is, necessary. The common people should be prepared, prior war. “James Legge, a missionary, a sinologist, a professor. The master said, “To lead an uninstructed people to war is to throw them away.” His point of view was that you must teach the men before you left them go off to war.” (doc. 1) Doc. 2, statements made by Gurus in the Sikh faith: The first Guru pledges love and peace for all humankind. A Guru, later, explained that there are some justifications for war when diplomacy fails. “J. Ferguson, a poet, a believer of peace until no other option is left. He thinks that when all the effort to make/ restore peace fails, and seems to be useless, it is right to fight.” (doc. 2) Doc.4, scriptures from the New Testament: The scriptures taken from Jesus’ teachings explain to followers to love their enemies. “This was found in the New Testament in the Bible, it says love your enemies [Mathew 5:44].” (doc.4) These are grouped together due to the fact that in both documents its says that only when all else fails is war necessary. War should not be the…

    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Modernism Question Paper

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the Apostle Paul, Christians should be peaceable toward people regardless of their views or opinions. 
Answer
True…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    National Socialism and Fascism also spawned from Nietzsche and his thoughts on society. Nietzsche himself was very much socialist in his beliefs which is evident in much of what he wrote. Though socialism may seem far from Nietzsche's idea of the superman, it is actually very close because the ruler is looked at as a superman who makes all decisions and knows what is…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The allegation Nietzsche’s madman makes is that God is dead and all of us are the murderers of God. The madman’s allegation is not a statement of belief but rather as an allegation against the atheists. Why? Well atheists claim that God is dead; that they killed him yet they still hold onto God. If what they claim is to be true (God is dead), then God deserves a burial. The madman, in fact, stated in several churches the following: “what after all are these churches now if they are not the tombs and sepulchers of God?” (Falikowski, 2004) Furthermore, after the madman makes his allegation he remained silent and started at his listeners (the atheists) and his listeners were quiet and started at him in stupefaction. This gives reason to believe…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though they were separated by thousands of years, hundreds of miles, and different cultures, the philosophical views of Friedrich Nietzsche and Plato can be examined and weighed against each other in many different ways. Friedrich Nietzsche, born in 1844, was a German philosopher whose main goal was to erect a new image for the people and to create a free spirit in them. Plato, born in 427 B.C., was a Greek philosopher whose main goal was to create a new way of thinking about the world itself, knowledge itself, philosophy itself, and the individual. Both philosophers have obvious similarities; their literary style of writing is perhaps the most apparent, but also their desire to create a new way of thinking for the people in which they hoped to influence.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Morality As Anti-Nature

    • 749 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To Nietzsche, denying your own passions is like denying reality. If your passions were a tiger, a strong man would catch the tiger and tame it. A weak man would at least run away. But it is only a fool who pretends that the tiger doesn't exist. The greatest of moralities are those that accomodate nature... the weakest of moralities are those that deny it.…

    • 749 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nietzsche believed that the whole of society around him had been affected by nihilistic thought and that not just current society but for the century preceding and the century to follow would be afflicted with nihilism. Goudsblom (1980) believed that nihilism was the path taken when existence had lost all meaning, yet he posited that there were two forms of nihilism which could be drawn from Nietzschean though; active nihilism and passive nihilism. Active nihilism is seen as a force which destroys all false values and creates a new way of thought, it does not despair woe is me, nor is it just the thought that all must be destroyed, it is action in this thought (Goudsblom 1980, p. 12). Passive nihilism is the resignation to the ever-looming hopelessness and produces active search for something to believe in, for loss of previous beliefs. Yet the common ground these two hold is purposelessness, which brings us closer to the meaning behind nihilism (Goudsblom 1980, p. 12) .Goudsblom (1980) found in Nietzsche’s words the best way to define nihilism as “that the highest values devalue themselves” (p. 11). This means that for a nihilist, all values have become obsolete; “life has no objective, that any purpose which we attribute to existence is no more than our interpretation of it, false and untenable” (Goudsblom 1980, p. 11). For the realisation of all this, the nihilist is helpless to its…

    • 3087 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christianity

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jesus said, “You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.” But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be children of your father in heaven. The notion of loving one’s enemies was thought to be a radical idea during the time.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Frederick Douglass

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He went on to say later that ,"I love the pure, peaceable, and impar- tial Christianity of Christ: I therefore hate the cor- rupt, slaveholding,…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Who stands firm? Only the one for whom the final standard is not his reason, his principles, his conscience, his freedom, his virtue, but who is ready to sacrifice all these, when faith and sole allegiance to God, he is called to obedient and responsible action: the responsible person, whose life will be nothing but an answer to God’s question and call.” This quote reflected Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s view of Christianity. Bonhoeffer was a German pastor and religious scholar who opposed Adolph Hitler and the German Nazis. Bonhoeffer was one of the few Christian leaders actively to resist the discriminatory actions of the German leaders.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A religion can be seen as a unified system of beliefs and practices which are relative to sacred things and beliefs (Giddens 1972, p.224). It can shape ones thoughts and feelings and gives people a sense of hope and something to believe in. All three main sociologist writers Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim offer different perspectives on religion and how important it is to society. Some of the theorists chose to have a positive view whilst others argue the unimportance of religion. This essay attempts to discover which theorist has the most accurate perspective of religion in modern times. This is done by firstly explaining the basic ideas regarding to religion put forward by Marx, Weber and Durkheim. Then both Marx's and Durkheim's thought will be compared and contrasted in order to determine the differences and similarities between their ideas. Finally, it will be explained which one of the theorists views and ideas are the most relevant to contemporary times and why.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays