Preview

History of Michigan 6th test Chap 16 17

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1783 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History of Michigan 6th test Chap 16 17
1. After 20 months of controversy, what did OPPONENTS of busing do one night in effort to focus national attention on Pontiac and the government program that was tearing city residents apart?
A) They held a rally where members of the Ku Klux Klan in white robes and hoods burned a cross on the lawn of City Park in downtown Pontiac.
B) They used dynamite to blow up 10 school buses and damage 3 others.
C) They surrounded Irene McCabe's residence so she and her family were trapped inside, shined huge spot lights on her house, and played loud rock 'n roll music through giant speakers until she agreed to move leave Pontiac forever.
D) They set fire to a brand new high school that had just been built in an all-white neighborhood and blamed blacks residents for burning it down.
2.What famous attorney defended Dr. Ossian Sweet, his wife, and his younger brother, Henry?
A) Frank Murphy
B) Philip A. Adler
C) Clarence Darrow
D) Daniel Webster
3.Dr. Ossian Sweet's case was decided by a jury of 12 white men. What verdict did the jury reach after just four hours of deliberation?
A) Dr. Sweet and all the other defendants were found innocent of all charges.
B) Dr. Sweet was found innocent, but his brother, Henry, was declared guilty of manslaughter and sentenced to 20 years in prison.
C) Dr. Sweet was found guilty of manslaughter and sentenced to 20 years in prison. After serving 2 years, he was released on condition he and his family leave Detroit.
4.In 1960, Dr. Ossian Sweet died. How?
A) He died of tuberculosis, like his daughter and wife.
B) He was found dead, a bullet through his head and a revolver in his hand.
C) He was hit by a car and run over while crossing Woodward Avenue.
D) TRICK QUESTION: Dr. Sweet actually died in 1944.
5.Early in 1959, Delbert L. Hatchett, then president of the Oakland County NAACP, filed suit in Federal Court complaining that Pontiac schools were deliberately segregated. Schools were either ___ percent white or ____ percent black.
A) 60 percent

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1.Michigan entered the railroad business in 1830. The state's first working rail line (billed as the "First Train West of the Alleghenies") ran from Lake Erie to what Michigan city?…

    • 2064 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Juror #8 displayed a style of leadership that some would say was democratic. He is liberal-minded, courageous, and a decent man.…

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The verdict is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant Thomas Randall should have anticipated the destructive consequences of his behavior in providing alcohol and encouraging the minor Kelly Greene to drink excessively at the party, as stated by witness William Doyle in his testimony in court. When she left party he should have realized Kelly Greene was in no condition to drive a vehicle when walking her to car, as witnessed by Helen Brook at her testimony in court. This makes him responsible for the death of Melissa Anderson’s young life ending.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    d) Thomas Delaney – A man charged and hanged to death for the murder of Matthew Rhineheart. He had…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    R v. Latimer The case with Robert Latimer all began with his twelve year old daughter having cerebral palsy and being quadriplegic. Tracy would suffer from many seizures a day and was also believed to have a brain capacity of a four-month old which caused her to be dependent. Tracy underwent many surgeries to try to give her an “easier” life but nothing seemed to chance any changes. No changes for the better or for the worse.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 6 Peggy

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Peggy Hettrick case has been a cold case for decades. The case from 1987 has been a mystery. August 10, 1998 Timothy Masters was charged for her murder. Timothy was released and charges were dismissed on January 22, 2008. The roles in this case were hard to follow. The prosecutor who has the role to present the state’s case against defense had to prove that Timothy’s knife collection, his drawings, failure to report seeing body, and the time frame of the crime was reasonably why he was the suspect in the murder of Peggy Hettrick. The police took several years trying to build a case and didn’t come up with much. Timothy Masters’ defense attorney, who has the job of representing the accused and to prove him innocent. They petitioned new trials due to the fact of lack of evidence. The original trial did not have the DNA and the defense attorneys had not been informed of other suspects. One of the other suspects was Richard Hammond. Richard Hammond also had a prior record of filming females in 1995. Hammond’s place of residence was 100 yards from the scene of murder with his bedroom facing the scene. Hammond committed suicide two days after arrest. The evidence of the prior suspect and reports from experts that said Masters was not guilty was enough for a judge to allow a new trial. The judge, who has the role to ensure justice and holds the ultimate authority and is responsible for balancing the rights of the accused and the interest of society, ruled that with all the evidence that was withheld a new trial would be allowed. The new trial found Timothy Masters not guilty and released from jail. Later the judges ruled in wrongful conviction and Timothy was granted millions.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Koppersmith was charged with murder and convicted of reckless manslaughter. On appeal The Alabama Supreme Court reversed the conviction and sent the case back to the trial court because Koppersmith was denied the right to testify about his intentions. He went to retrial and was convicted of reckless manslaughter and sentenced to twenty years in prison. He appealed this conviction to the Alabama Court of Appeals on the grounds that the jury was not given instructions on criminally negligent homicide.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Test: History of Michigan

    • 2314 Words
    • 8 Pages

    1.In 1820, the first steamboat sailed on the Great Lakes, as well as on the Detroit River. What was this vessel called?…

    • 2314 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sr Gil

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages

    b. “Nobody could tell him that a colored man could do anything he couldn’t do.”…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1) How did the majority opinion in the Supreme Court’s 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision legally shape race relations in the U.S. over the next half-century? On what grounds did Justice Harlan’s minority decision disagree?…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    d. Their acts of terrorism caused Republicans in the U.S. Congress to pass anti-Klan laws…

    • 1585 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. Now imagine, during the 1930's, that you were part of the trial of Tom Robinson vs.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Felony Murder Rule

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Examine the felony murder rule: discuss some of the problems associated with it. What problems do you think were involved in the case of Brandon Hein?…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Q: What reasons did the Supreme Court give in favor of desegregation? What reasons did black students give for wanting to attend integrated schools? How do these reasons differ?…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Case

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In December 2002 Dominic Li answered his front door to two men (Richard Nimmo and Maua Sua) both armed with guns. Sua and Nimmo were being paid by Yonky Irvin Tan, a drug dealer whom Li’s brother in law owed money to. Both Sua and Nimmo poured hydrochloric acid onto Mr Li where he suffered burns to his face, became blind and burns to his oesophagus. Mr Li painfully passed away three weeks later due to these injuries sustained as they led to a blockage in his throat that blocked his breathing. Tan was found guilty of plannng the murder and sentenced to life in prison. Sua and Nimmo were found not guilty to the murder but found guilty on other offences.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays