Many states and school district put their whole focus on passing these standardized test that make their district look better rather than broadening their horizon and teaching students from a bigger template. In some cases, these tests evaluate whether a student can advance to the next grade or not. What higher school officials need to understand is that the student is not gaining educational value through 1 test, rather than learning individualized math and history and gaining a broader view of knowledge.
3) The significance of High Stakes Testing putting the pressure and all of the importance on a single test. A student can have straight A’s in high school all 4 years passing every class and having a clear understanding of the subject matter but failing the SAT and not getting into a College or University in consequence of the …show more content…
He or she must pin point what is needed for the student to pass the test and make the local school officials feel accomplished.
• When a teacher develops a syllabus, they inform they will take the students from point A to point Z throughout the time given in the year. Developing the students’ knowledge step by step allowing the student to take in information week after week.
• The teacher slims down what they sought after teaching to purely focus on what will be assigned on the standardized test.
• Incentives for teachers who meet the challenges
• Incentives for students who meet the requirements
• A measuring stick to see where the students are at that time
A. Concluding high stakes testing, it’s a program that doesn’t allow a clear understanding of how much or what a person knows about a specific subject. 1 test of knowledge does not come close to knowledge over a certain subject over time and through a process of evaluation rather than a process of a single component. A scientist does not make a claim after 1 test, they test their theory over and over to finalize a conclusion and come to an answer as our education system needs to go