Preview

Group Working Skills

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
750 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Group Working Skills
INTRODUCTION
There will be a group working in many areas and in lots of situations. Particularly, in the university the group working may be the section of the student’s task. And in the company the group working should be needed in many aspects, such as the sales group, the marketing group, the production of development group and so on. In this essay, I will discuss the definition of group dynamics, the group’s factors which involve norms, roles, cohesiveness and the development stages of group. And then I will explain these factors use my own experiences.
GROUP DYNAMICS
Before describing the group dynamics I would like to describe my group. We are a band and there are four members that are guitar player, drum player, bass player and a singer. Payne and Whitaker, (2000) say, ‘group dynamics is the named given to the way that a group deals with the factors that affect it from within itself.’ There are some major factors which involve norms, roles, cohesiveness and the development stages of group.
There is a great relationship in our band, and we also have a nice communication between us. There are also some other reasons to prove our group has a good relationship among us in the following contents.
NORMS
There are different norms in the various groups. As Payne and Whitaker say, ‘Norms always develop in groups and will control or inhibit the behaviour of individual members in a particular set of circumstances.’ (Payne and Whitaker, 2000: 61) In our group, there is no smoking when we practice the performance. Everyone’s mobile phone should be turned off or kept silence. We cannot play other performance when we prepare the new performance. We cannot speak to each other when the leader speaks. These norms ensure we can have a peaceful condition in our group and ensure we have a great relationship between us.
ROLES
Everyone should have their own roles in the group. Payne and Whitaker (2000) claim roles can be classified into three categories which involve group



Bibliography: Payne, E. and Whittaker, L. (2000) Developing Essential Study Skills, London: Prentice Hall.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    This essay examines and explains how groups develop and function. Groups are a fundamental part of our lives from social to professional, from large to small, depending on their particular environment.…

    • 2097 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The genesis and growth of a group always goes through five stages: forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. Forming is always the first stage, where the group members meet for the first time and roles as well as structure and purpose are not firmly established. This stage closes when the individuals label themselves as a group. Appropriately named, the storming stage is defined by intragroup conflict in the areas of limited autonomy and leadership, and is a critical in group development. The resolution of this stage comes with a visible leader along with rankings of group members. After the dust has settled, the norming stage begins with development of cohesiveness, close relationships, and ends when organization of the group solidifies into expected roles and behaviors. Actual group function starts in the performing stage where the group is wholly accepted and can begin working toward the task that was assigned. Adjourning is when the task is completed, and the group disbands.…

    • 941 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2.5 Consider the barriers to effective group work with young people and explore/examine strategies to address these…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The intent of this paper is to discuss the dynamics of a group of coworkers and peers form the perspective of social psychology. The group will be analyzed in relation to the formation of norms, roles, hierarchy, potential groupthink, and any communication patterns as observed.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Learning Team Problems

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In order to accomplish this task we will first look at the team dynamics. The following things will be considered during this process: 1) what a group is and functions of its members and the function of group members, 2 Social changes, development process, roles and norms within the group. These areas also included basic building blocks, group structure, member characteristics, and manager’s effects on group development.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    group cohesion

    • 1431 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Understanding the cause of formation of the group is a key factor that affect group cohesion. This stage in fundamental in group formation and is also key in determining the members that are to form the group. This is important since each will know the goal and objective of the group. For this reason, individuals who have different interests from the group should not sign up to be group members. On the other hand, individuals who have similar interests with the interests of the group may sign up and be members of the group. This leads to all members having similar interests and, therefore, the group activities are synchronized. As a result, the group objectives will be reached, and there will be minimal grievances within the group.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Week 3 Case Study

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In “The Forgotten Group Member” case study, the organizational behavior group developed using some of these five stages: forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. Forming is characterized by the groups desire to be accepted. This is the orientation part of the group development and a leader is chosen. In the storming stage, group members often discuss and debate about which tasks and duties are assigned to whom. The key factor in the successful transition from this stage is the ability to listen. While in the norming phase, cohesion is evident through the group’s interpersonal relationships. Each member is opened to new ideas based on the facts presented by other members. An understanding of each other leads to a higher trust level which leads to a better working team. Performing, while not reached by every group, is an evolution of independence within the group, where there is trust that everyone will perform as desired and there are no interpersonal issues amongst the members. The final stage is adjourning, which includes the conclusion of tasks, relationships, goodbyes and the recognition of performances and participation in the group.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For week three topics of discussion we decided to discuss the five stages of development a group priority. After reading and reviewing the information provided there are many things that were very important. When it comes to the five stages of development they include forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Each of these stages placed in important role in development. However, what defines a group groups are two or more individuals that come together for the same reasons. They can be formal or informal. Groups are formed for social identity and the development of emotional reaction exists when a group fails or succeed. This helps members identify who they are and where they fit in. As the stages of development the first stage show management that the forming stage you can expect employees to start to see themselves as a group. Next the storming stage is when members begin to disagree about who will be in charge. When in the norming dates is a step the members behavior consists of cooperation and working towards a common goal. The performing stage is when members begin to work successfully with great energy. And in the adjourning stage, which is the final stage, shows what happens to the members at the end of the group and they resume their normal responsibility as these stages show what to expect when groups are formulated. As many react differently these stages are for people with a strong sense of purpose. As we take a look at group properties we have roles, standards that are acceptable behavior. Status is a social rank given to each member who exhibit different roles, bright, and ritual to differentiate themselves. The size of a group does matter it shows the overall behavior of the group. Smaller groups tend to be faster, while larger groups are better problem solver. Cohesiveness shows that members tend to get along and are motivated to stay in the group. Finally diversity shows difference of each of the members. The diversity shows that in…

    • 433 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Evaluating Team Performance

    • 3396 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Dion, K. L., 2000. Group cohesion: From “field of forces” to multidimensional construct. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4,p 7–p26.…

    • 3396 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Working In Groups

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The difference between decision making and problem solving in a team is that decision making forces a judgment to be made whether it's the one thought of by pone member of the team or an alternative while the problem solving is a process that allows the team to think the problem through in order to access the best possible way of dealing with it with little or no repercussions.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Group dynamics is that field which studies the behaviour of individuals in small groups, such as decision making groups, T-groups, friendships, work groups and so forth. (Hoggs & Abrams ,1990 p.95)…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Diverse Society

    • 550 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the paper I will discuss the compact that group dynamics has on diverse society. The group cohesiveness is facts which decide how well a group embraces as one. On the other hand, group cohesiveness is well-built; a group will stay strong and secure. Group cohesiveness is the capability to reflect and take action as individual if the group is actually as one or not. In addition, group cohesiveness means sustaining the group in no matter what choice or accomplishment it receives still if a group associate in my opinion is not in act of kindness of the act or idea.…

    • 550 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Working in Groups

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    C. If someone is not doing his or her job, report it to the teacher.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Working in Groups

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Champoux (2011), a group is a set of individuals interdependently working towards a common goal. Hellriegel & Slocum (2011) further added that a group must be small enough for individual to communicate person to person with other members. Decision making is one routine task a group has to undertake. According to Nelson et al. (2012), members in a group can influence and encourage one another, share their knowledge and expertise, which will produce better decision. However, Champoux, (2011) argue that group may require more time to complete the task due to time taken to ‘settle down’ by members.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The goal of most research on group development is to learn why and how small groups change over time. To do this, researchers examine patterns of change and continuity in groups over time. Aspects of a group that might be studied include the quality of the output produced by a group, the type and frequency of its activities, its cohesiveness, the existence of group conflict.In interpreting behaviour of a particular group, it is important to recognize not only a broad pattern of development but also the unique characteristics of the particular group and the circumstances that contribute to (or detract from) its development. The way in which a particular group develops, depends in part on such variables as the frequency with which group members interact and personal characteristics of group members. However, it is generally believed that groups pass through a standard sequence of five stages.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays