Preview

Gladiator Revenge

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1211 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gladiator Revenge
Gladiator, though not the most intellectually stimulating film of this decade, was deeper and more complex than one might gather from it at first glance. Its theme was not a simple "good-guy versus bad-guy" one as one might gather from the title. In fact, Gladiator in essence had very little to do with gladiators. Its real purpose, its real underlying flavor, was to depict a man 's struggle against decadence in his society and to restore it to the disciplined one that it had been, a man who was driven not by outlandish ideals, but by down-to-earth loyalties and affections.

The plot of this film is relatively simple. Marcus Aurelius, empreror of Rome at the time, asks Maximus, his favorite general, to become emperor after his death and eventually
…show more content…
He is more bitter at this point than in the beginning of the movie, but that is not due to his new station in life. Rather, it is because of the death of his wife and son.

The death of Maximus ' family was a product of Commodus ' actions, Commodus being representative of the more decadent parts of Roman society ("Commodus," n.pag). Seeking revenge for his family could indirectly be translated into restoring the Senate to Rome, and vice versa. On top of that, Maximus felt he had to fullfill Marcus Aurelius ' wishes. This is where his struggle against society is rooted: it is not rooted in his idealizations of how Rome should be, but rather on his personal promises and vendettas alike.

There is more of interest to Maximus personally than his family and the late emperor. Maximus has an affinity for Lucila, though it is not necessarily an erotic one. Another driving force behind his motives to restore Rome to the Senate is his sense of responsibility for Lucila and, in particular, her
…show more content…
To protect himself, he holds Lucila 's son hostage and threatens his life if Lucila does not turn the plan over to him. Her first loyalty being to her son and her primary interests being in his health and well-being, she succumbs to Commodus ' ploy and, through her, he foils to plan to overthrow him.

Roman soldiers, now answering to Commodus, storm the gladiator "stables" in an attempt to capture Maximus. It is in this scene that the loyalty Maximus commands becomes evident: each of his fellow gladiators, as well as his master, are willing to die for him. His loyalty to his loved ones, though not exactly reflected in the actions of Lucila, is at least matched with the undying--quite literally--loyalty of his fellow gladiators.

Maximus eventually gets a chance at revenge for his family, when he is put against Commodus in the ring. He eventually kills Commodus, after a long struggle and despite a wound he acquired previously to the tournament, but even here his actions are not cold-blooded. He does not kill Commodus in his sleep, nor does he kill him in anyh drawn out way; he kills him efficiently, and in many ways out of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The movie never showed Marcus Aurelius in his youth when he was the ruler, but only showed when he was a dying man. Of course, the movie was not based off Marcus Aurelius, but it could have gone more in depth of what his beliefs were on life and his citizens. The movie kind of represents Rome as a great city, but in reality, while Aurelius was the Emperor, Rome was not all that great. Aurelius went through a tough time during his reign. He spent most of the times defending his empire against the Parthians, Germans, and Britons. The movie also shows him getting killed by his son Commodus, but he really died of a plague during another war in which he was trying to defend the territory of…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marcus Aurelius would have had mixed feelings about the collapse of the Roman Empire in the mid-to-late third century AD. An admirer of change, Marcus would have accepted the direction that the Empire was heading in, but not necessarily through the murderous means in which it transpired. He also was an enormous aficionado of living as close to in accordance with nature as was possible and not enjoying an overly lavish lifestyle. Few of the Emperors during the mid-to-late third century AD were overtly careless with their reigns, and most were entirely focused on maintaining defense. According to Aurelius, nothing could be more in accordance with nature than death, or in this case a violent death, which was the fate of every emperor that took…

    • 2049 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Jerry Toner’s book The Day Commodus Killed a Rhino: Understanding the Roman Games, the reader is introduced into the violent, blood thirsty society that is the Roman Empire. In the prologue to the book, Toner writes “One modern writer described these ‘bloodthirsty human holocausts’ as ‘by far the nastiest blood-sport ever invented. He claimed that ‘the two most quantitatively destructive institutions in History are Nazism and the Roman Gladiators’.” The Roman Empire, as a whole, was a violent society. Their violence though, was something that was celebrated and embodied by Romans. In Jerry Toner’s book The Day Commodus Killed a Rhino: Understanding the Roman Games, it becomes evident through the Romans “bread and circus” society, that being…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Remember, Roman, that it is for thee to rule the nations. This shall be thy task, to impose the ways of peace, to spare the vanquished, and to tame the proud by war."…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Roman culture was a clear portrayal of duality; despite being highly developed and sophisticated, it was built upon a foundation of blood, cruelty and brutality. These qualities led to an absolute fascination with the gladiatorial games, which became an integral aspect of Roman society for hundreds of years. From its religious origins, the gladiatorial games evolved into defining Roman culture, furthermore playing a role in its decline. Entertaining the crowds was the top priority for Roman emperors, apparent in the exaggerated methods used in combat. A number of factors lead to the decline of the gladiatorial games, particularly the rise of Christianity and its association with bloodshed and slavery.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assassins perceived him as dictator and threat to republic. After Rome was sent into turmoil for murdered, who had no future plans and though death would lead to restorations of the republic…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Know this, sons of Rome, this decree is given by our gods, and must be followed. Which of you has the stomach, but the strength to follow such a decree while not destroy this Empire?” He turns to the heirs and gestures for them to step up to the front of the stage. “You, Maxentius, nephew of Emperor Maximian, who would burn the flesh of man following orders? You Galerius, who would show the worth of a man’s years of loyal service as nothing for one mistake to be hung on the wall? But you, Constantine are the most dangerous of any of you. Your reasoning, your questioning mind, is better suited for a scholar than an emperor. One who questions the laws set down by the gods’ law should not lead others by it.” Turning to Emperor Maximian, he says, “Choose one of your blood to succeed brother.” Diocletian turns back, and faces Severus, “For this man, Severus is the only man I can see to fulfill the gods’ command for the…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the battle of Actium (31 B.C.), Octavian remained the sole leader from the Triumvirate to rule the largest Empire of that period. Shrewd and subtle politician, Octavian learnt from his predecessor, Julius Caesar, and avoided his mistakes. During his reign, Julius Caesar forced the Senate to proclaim him dictator for life and arrogantly acted as a king (wearing the purple robe of Roman kings and encouraging religious cults in his honor). In this manner, Caesar publicly defied the republican tradition and the conservative Senate, which lead to his death in 44 B.C. Therefore, Octavian realized the strong allegiance and affection of the Senate and People towards the political system of the Republic. Octavian did not underestimate nor neglect this allegiance, but rather used it to gradually introduce legitimate monarchy and bring what Romans most wanted: peace and tolerance.…

    • 931 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coriolanus Virtues

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Coriolanus has been raised to behold only martial virtues and because of this he excels in battles. His warrior nature makes him fearless, dangerous and brutal, leaving him with no ability to be patient, humble and considerate. This is evident when he threatens to kill the Roman soldiers who don’t fight honourably and who flee from war against Corioles; “He that retires, I’ll take him for a Volsce, and he shall feel mine edge.” Which results in Coriolanus defeating the Volsces completely on his own and for this being called a hero. During the same war, Coriolanus askes the soldiers: “Make you a sword of me?” which compares him to a weapon, something absent of any pity but full of sorrow. Coriolanus is also often left to ‘pretend’ to behave in a suitable manner that best suits the people. As seen when he says; “It is part/ that I shall blush in acting, and might well/ be taken from the people.” Although he is unable to do so; proving…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “What a slave of about 200 A.D. had to do in order to save himself from constant cuffs and stripes is here set forth somewhat humorously, but with a serious undercurrent of grim truth.” 6 “There was no high motive for a slave to behave himself, simply a fear of cruel punishment if he did not”6 “There might be a hope of ultimate freedom, but that depended entirely on the caprice of the master.”6 During that time there was no true hope that slavery would end or that these slaves would ever receive any type of civil rights under the Roman Empire. It was there choice to choose their own destiny and the only way to grant freedom was escape. For instance Spartacus fighting had led him to his death but he was very successful many times throughout their journey. “Grown confident in their numbers, and puffed up with their success, would give no obedience to him, but went about and ravaged Italy; so that now the senate was not only moved at the indignity and baseness , both of the enemy and of the insurrection, but, looking upon it as a matter of alarm and of dangerous consequences sent out both consoles to it, as to a great and difficult enterprise.”7 Spartacus played an important role to the slaves, they looked up to him as a leader and as a leader that gave them hope. He was smart with tragedies and created a difference in the end for the Roman Empire.Escaping seemed to be better for Spartacus and his troops then to be treated like anything less than human. His courage is what made others look up to him as a hero and a true freedom…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Octavian learned that as Julius Caesar’s adopted great nephew, he was entitled to be the legal principle heir of all that belonged to Caesar. Although taking on such a role was a high risk to his own safety, making him a target by association with Caesar and his agenda, he pressed forward with an insatiable ambition. Possibly driven by the Roman cursus honorum, a lust for power and riches, and a desire for avenging the death of his great uncle, Octavian already had an advantage from the beginning.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Titus Andronicus Revenge

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Within Titus Andronicus, there are fourteen killings, six severed members, rape, a live burial and many more hirousicous acts. Everyone who committed a crime or acted upon the desire for revenge dies. Through all of the drama and the heartbreak, the revenge tragedy ends with the deaths of both Tamora, Titus, and Aaron. Aaron is able to execute his plans to tear apart people's lives. With his success came his punishment, being buried alive “breast-deep in earth and famish him./ There let him stand and rave and cry for food” (V.iii.180-182). Titus gets satisfaction out of killing Chiron and Demetrius then feeding them to Tamora in pie form. Shortly after, he kills Tamora setting off another chain reaction of which Saturninus commands Titus to “die, frantic wretch, for this accurséd deed” then proceeds to kill Titus(V.iii.65). Directly after Saturninus gets his revenge on Titus, he dies at the hands of Lucius. Karma comes around and affects everyone who has done wrong. Killing some while others are left to feel the heartbreak of…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The story is about Maximus, one of the leading generals in the Roman army. He led the Romans to victory in a decisive battle with the Barbarians that ended a long war between them. This victory helped him gain trust and favour from the old Emperor Marcus Aurelius, which is now old and near his end. Emperor Aurelius wishes to appoint Maximus as the temporary leader of Rome, even though he has a son, Commodus. Commodus, being told by his father that he would not be the appointed emperor, murders Marcus in a fit of rage and claims the throne. He then ordered the execution of Maximus to secure his claim to the throne. Maximus escaped execution, but he was unable to save his son and wife in Spain from the soldiers that Commodus sent. After burying them, Maximus was then found unconscious by slave traders and was taken to Zucchabar ,a small Roman province in Africa. He was then sold to slavery and forced to become a gladiator. Eventually, Maximus and his fellow gladiators are sent to Rome to perform for Commodus. Maximus then wastes no time in making his presence known and reveals his true identity in front of Commodus and the masses. He is soon involved in a plot to overthrow the emperor with his former lover, Lucilla, Commodus’ sister whom he lusts and is the mother of Lucius.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics of Gladiator

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The practical wisdom, that Aristotle suggests evokes a moral code within an individual, is displayed through the different upbringings of the two contrasting main characters. Maximus’s childhood isn’t super detailed within the film, however the viewers are aware that he had experienced struggles that could have ruined or aided his ethical code. With this in mind, his character proves to have gained an enormous amount of practical wisdom that caused him to ultimately die honorably. Maximus’s character displays courage and justice in the battle scenes, but more impressively he exhibits these same traits in his relationships. In comparison, the antagonist Commodus had an upbringing that constantly stressed to him the importance of power and the need to gain it regardless of the consequences. It is inevitable that Commodus’s moral values were going to be skewed; however his experiences throughout his life should have provoked some sort of conscience. But rather, Commodus’s continuous gain of power allowed him to disregard moral values and associate negative decisions with positive outcomes. Hence, he never actually experiences the consequences of his actions until he dies without any form of honor.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dialogues

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Maximus. Maximus. Maximus. They call for you. The general who became a slave. The slave who became a gladiator. The gladiator who defied an emperor. A striking story.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics