Ginger Robinson
CJS/200
November 30, 2014
Lee Rankin
Courtroom Players
In most courtrooms, there are groups of essential players that work together on a regular basis. They are composed of a combination of professionals. These professional are the ones which understand all phases of a criminal trial, and they all work together in fulfilling the functions of the court.
These courtroom workgroups are all of the professionals that aid in a court process. These professionals include the judge, the prosecuting attorneys, the defense attorneys, public defenders and all other persons which may work for the courts. These individuals work collectively with the basic purpose of conducting successful courtroom proceedings. Each of professional in the courtroom workgroup has their own set of responsibilities.
The prosecutor is accountable for exhibiting the state’s evidence as well as presenting and preparing the state’s case against the accused. It is also the prosecuting attorneys responsibility to decide which matters should be tried or not. It is the prosecutor who makes these determinations based on a several sets of criteria. Most prosecutors will study the evidence against the accused, study the crime, as well as many other factors.
If the criteria for taking a case were less stringent our society would be in for some extremely hard days because as it stands now prosecutors plea bargain so many instances and criminals get to serve less time or sometimes no time at all. This is because of our strained criminal justice system. I think if I could improve the system I would find a way to have each and every guilty criminal carry out their time with zero tolerance what so ever.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The court system was formed to separate the innocent from the guilty when a disparity has surfaced or developed. In the criminal justice system everyone is entitled to a fair and unbiased trial. We will be identifying and describing the distinguishing features of the major court system ranging from state level, superior court and federal district court through the U.S. Supreme Court. Second we will discuss the key players, jurisdiction rules, and interpretation on issues and the effect of evolving technologies on the court proceeding at all levels in the court system.…
- 1224 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
| |trials. A prosecutor's job is limited to criminal |however, a prosecutor's client is the state and its |…
- 1062 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
This paper going to be coving the materials we went over in the You make the Call: Discretion in Criminal Justice Courtroom Workgroup simulation. You are the new assistance prosecutor for the DA Office. You are faced with problem solving and what action are taking to the choices you make in your new position as the assistance prosecutor. In this paper it will describe the problem you faced in the simulation. Also this paper will explain the approaches used for resolving the problem. Last it will discuss how critical or creative thinking skills were used or not used in the simulation.…
- 620 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays -
According to the textbook the courtroom work group is the professional courtroom actors, including judges, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorney, public defenders and others who earn a living serving the court. The jobs of the courtroom work group vary from person to person. The courtroom work group interacts in many ways on a daily basis. All of the different professionals have their specific jobs to do.…
- 337 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
It has been commonly known and is no secret that case volumes in court have increased among with crime due to the constant new laws being created, the lack of fear from the criminals and in some occasions the lack of procedure knowledge from the community with possible offenders. I’ve seen many cases that could be resolved with the appropriate guidance without the need to visit a court room. In occasions unnecessary complains contribute to case overloads. Court judges in occasion recur to sending these cases for review with a mediator to see if it may be solved after the parties have cooled down and are giving the proper advice before considering it a regular case for sentencing.…
- 1550 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The courtroom is where all the rulings take place and depending on the case, there can be…
- 797 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the courtroom there is a group of key players that work together on a daily basis. They are made of a group of professionals. These professional are those who know all aspects of a criminal trial and they work together in performing the duties of the court.…
- 328 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The domain of prosecutors has been extended to provide greater authority. An example of domain expansion of the prosecutors is improving police-prosecutors relationships. Truthfully, police officers and prosecutors are looked at as the bad guys in the eyes of the public. They are both to serve justice, even though they have different perspectives on the law. For example, the police officers consider a case to be closed when the suspect is arrest, but the prosecutor needs obtain more information and evidence to win the case in court. Prosecutors depend off of the police to obtain a conviction; this all depends on how the police officers investigate and the quality of their arrests. Although both police officers and prosecutors have sought strategies…
- 261 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In Virginia State, Jay Lentz was convicted by a jury in July 2003 for the kidnapping and murder of his wife. The jury recommended that Mr. Lentz spend life in prison; however, the United States District Judge Gerald Lee dismissed the kidnapping charge due to lack of evidence. Two weeks after the judge convicted Mr. Lentz of murder, he found evidence of prosecutorial misconduct therefore the judge ordered a new trial for the alleged murder charge.…
- 1215 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
A courtroom workgroup in the U.S criminal justice system is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer. The courtroom working group seeks to bring justice to all. It ensures that all parties are accorded due fairness and equal opportunity regardless of gender, race, age, religious affiliation nor any other factor. They also see to it that trials are completed successfully. These individuals are grouped into two categories. These are the professionals and the outsiders. Professionals are the court officers such as the judges, attorneys, public defenders, defense attorneys and court reporters. I believe that the criminal prosecutor, defense attorney, and a judicial officer make up the most common courtroom work group. The daily interaction of this group is to make sure that rules are being followed in each group. Also making sure it is given in a timely fashion. The courtroom work group needs to work in order to offer plea bargains and select jurors.…
- 740 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
So they then turn to plea bargaining as a way to deliver justice efficiently. (p. 61) The prosecutor 's office has the responsibility of trial preparation and also has to shoulder the costs that are associated with obtaining evidence and interviewing witnesses among other pretrial preparations. (p. 309) Therefore, the prosecutor will then select which case to take to trial and which to plead out. This is based on whether he thinks he has sufficient evidence to prove every element of the charge. Also, he might not have complete confidence in the witnesses ' testimony or there is a chance the victim might refuse to cooperate at the last minute. Prosecutors also use plea bargaining to reward a cooperating defendant. (Neubauer, 2002, p.…
- 2149 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
A prosecutor has limited constraints when bringing charges against someone. A prosecutor cannot bring charges vindictively against a person because a defendant successfully appealed a conviction. In the presence of probable cause the prosecutor is not permitted to bring charges for such improper reasons. It would be inappropriate for a prosecutor to bring charges against someone is if he or she knew that the evidence was tampered with, like improper behavior of a cop. If the attorney knew that the evidence given was under false pretense or had been fabricated, filing charges would be inappropriate. Another case would be if the lawyer trust that there is insufficient evidence to convict or if the case is not sufficiently strong to warrant an indictment. A prosecutor choosing that…
- 366 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Plea bargaining not only serves a purpose in our criminal justice system; it has become a vital part of it. The significance of plea bargaining can be overlooked because of the implications of the wording. The term “plea bargain” sometimes implies a misnomer in the fact that it leads one to believe those who accept a plea bargain are getting off easy which in many cases is not true. In many cases, plea bargains prove to be the most efficient method of invoking justice on criminals (Bohm & Haley, 2011).…
- 451 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The courtroom work group is composed of various people who make the court systems work to the best of their ability. Each person has its position, and she/he is responsible for their part. We can start from the top, first we have a Judge, he/she is responsible for imposing the proper judging techniques in the courtroom, and they are to make sure the accused rights are not violated in the courtroom. Then we have a defense attorney, and the defense attorney is to defend his client against any wrongdoing by the court and prove his client is innocent of the charges being brought to him/her.…
- 1422 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The criminal justice system changes in regards to rules, procedures, and terms from state to state. But no matter what the punishment given to criminals cannot vary based on the standards set forth by the United States. A crime is described as an action that violates the federal laws of the United States. On the down side, all violations are viewed with different severities of punishment. Crimes can be looked at from as minimal as a traffic violation and elevate to as severe as homicide. The severity of the crime will establish the severity of what the punishment will be. The criminal justice system was designed to give order to standardize the level of punishment to fit the crime committed appropriately. The criminal justice system is mainly affected by constitutional law and has grown significantly over time. The current criminal justice system maintains itself by helping the process of catching and giving time to criminals.…
- 1125 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays