Preview

Foreshadowing in Julius Caesar

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
514 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Foreshadowing in Julius Caesar
______________________________________________________________________________

1.“A common slave--you'd know him well by sight--
Held up his left hand, which did flame and burn
Like twenty torches join'd, and yet his hand
Not sensible of fire remain'd unscorch'd.”
Interpretation/foreshadow: For a slave to hold up a his burning had that somehow remained immune to the fire, to me represents an angry rebellion. Caesar is very “hot headed” and arrogant so a slave would naturally be angry at his leaders indifference to him hence a hot burning angry fire on a fist on defiance and rebellion.

2. “...besides,--I ha' not since put up my sword,--
Against the Capitol I met a lion,
Who glared upon me, and went surly by,
Without annoying me:”
Interpretation/foreshadow: A lion represent a very powerful and mighty beast, like a King. The lion is a vicious animal. This could be how some of the people see Caesar. Shakespeare could be saying this as a way to hint at the possibility of having an aggressive leader in the future of Rome.

“...and there where drawn upon a heap a hundred ghastly women,
Transformed with their fear...”
Interpretation/foreshadow: For hundreds of haunting women to be gathered in a heap creates an image of a very uneasy, and fearful environment and setting. The community is not at all peaceful in Rome.

“...men, all in fire, walk up and down the streets.”
Interpretation/foreshadow: Fire can be seen as anger, fright, and aggression. So For a group of men to be burning in flames walking down a street this could be seen as an angry mob or rebellious group. Perhaps the group Casca is assembling to meet at Pompey’s Porch that very night.

“...And yesterday the bird of night did sit
Even at noonday upon the marketplace,
Howling and shrieking.”
Interpretation/foreshadow: This creates an image of a dark shadowy day, so dark that a night owl could mistake midday for midnight. Owls where seen as bad omens so perhaps

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s interpretation of Julius Caesar’s assassination titled, Julius Caesar, a man named Cassius is attempting to get the help and alliance of a fellow Roman named Brutus in the conspiracy of assassinating the Roman leader. He accomplishes this in constructed and detailed monologues to persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy. In each of Cassius’ monologues, Cassius strategically uses appeals and rhetorical devices to ultimately give a successful and persuasive speech to his audience, Brutus.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Works of literature often feature characters whose pride or selfishness creates problems. In William Shakespeare’s ‘’Julius Caesar’’, Caesar’s pride creates problems because it causes him to overlook the warnings signs that point him towards his demise. Thus Caesar’s experience with pride ultimately leads to his tragic demise.…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.Southern region of the modern France around Marseilles is called Provence. After Julius Caesar's’ conquest in the 1st century the Roman called that area Provincia Romana, which later evolved in Provence.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    anyone to find justification in the assassination of their emperor. Now, in Antony’s speech he…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the tragic play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, inside shows multiple evidences of hidden examples of the use of imagery, tone and rhetorical devices. A small example of literature tools could be found inside of this short example from the play, it is enough to express all elements of literature to be found. Brutus discusses the impending future of Rome, if placed upon Julius Caesar’s hands, and attempts to be convincing of others to slay Julius with his rise of power, before he takes the crown, as Julius Caesar follows by his heart more than his brain, he deems Julius Caesar not worthy of taking control over Rome. The tone, imagery, and rhetorical devices used by Shakespeare inside of this small excerpt is supposed to be translated as to further the development of the plot, which all results back to how most of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, pertains foreshadowing to a lot of chaos as a theme..…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare wrote many things. One of his greatest was his play Julius Caesar. The most known part about Caesar is how he dies, stabbed in the back by his best friend. Yet the night he was killed Calphurnia, Caesar’s wife, had warned Caesar not to go. But, Decius, a member of a group of conspirators, tries to persuade Caesar to go to the Senate where they plan to kill him. They both use rhetorical devices to try and sway Caesar their way, but Decius’s wins him over.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Caesars funeral two of his best men gave speeches, Antony and Brutus, they both used ethos, pathos and logos in different ways to win over the crowd. Brutus was in the senate so he was supposed to give great speeches with structure. Antony was a general so he was not as good at giving speeches but was good at pumping up his solders before battle. Which he used to his advantage when speaking to the mourning crowd.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare is widely regarded as one of the greatest English writers in history because of his use of figurative language writing skills. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses figurative language multiple times throughout the play. Shakespeare uses figurative language in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar to create a special effect or feeling for the reader. Some examples of figurative language that Shakespeare uses throughout the play includes: verbal irony, personification and metaphors. By using figurative language in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare indirectly expresses his ideas to the readers.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Power is a theme that has dominated mankind since history was recorded. The assassination of Julius Caesar, ruler of the greatest empire the world has ever known, was a result of such a struggle for power. The foundations of Shakespeare's 'Julius Caesar' are power relationships which dominate the liaisons between characters of opposing sex, classes, and ambitions. Even in the historical context, Rome in 44 BC, the height of the Roman Republic, predisposes the play to a complex tangle of power conflicts. As the power of prominent characters builds tension, ambitions develops, and thus manipulation arises. Struggles of authority and dominance are evident between the characters in 'Julius Caesar', through Shakespeare's…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Marc Antony makes a speech to the people of Rome after the death of Julius Caesar. Through this speech, Shakespeare uses language techniques such as irony, repetition/tone, and figurative language to illuminate conflict between the citizens of Rome and Brutus.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the opening scene of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare introduces conflict. Flavius and Murellus introduce Caesar as a contentious personality, as they rebuke the “mechanicals” who “make holidays to see Caesar” and “rejoice his triumph”. The Tribunes are unhappy with these celebrations as shown through the contrast in tone when Murellus adresses the “Mechanicals” with “You blocks, You stones, you worse than senseless things!” demonstrating the conflicting perspectives within the social classes. The Tribunes believe that Caesar's “growing feathers” need to be “Pluck's” as they are concerned that with his growing power they will be kept in “servile fearfulness”. Shakespeare conveys their anger at the fickleness of the “Mechanicals”, through the use of imperatives such as “answer me directly” and “be gone!'...” as they rebuke their “ingratitude” to Pompey. This shows the dominance of the Tribunes and…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banquo In Macbeth

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A: Lennox: "The obscure bird / Clamored the livelong night. Some say the earth / Was feverous and did shake." (2.3.67-69)…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In act two scene two, Caesar receives word that the priests, upon performing a sacrifice, cannot find the sacrificed beast's heart. Caesar does not interpret this the way he should, which is to stay in his house away from threats, but instead thinks that “the gods do this in shame of cowardice.” Shortly afterward, Caesar reveals that wife Calphurnia saw his statue, “which, like a fountain with a hundred spouts, did run pure blood.” Caesar, under the sway of Decius, again misinterprets this bad omen to mean that his “statue spouting blood in so many pipes, in which so many smiling Romans bathed, signifies that from you great Rome shall suck reviving blood.” As Caesar is full of pride, he is constantly looking for signs of his superiority, and when Decius gives this interpretation, Caesar laps it up without a second thought. Caesar, who thinks himself immune to flattery, can be so easily flattered by anything that pertains to his pride. However, these mistakes are not enough to damn him. In the end, Caesar makes a fatal mistake by directly insulting the gods with the words “Hence! Wilt thou lift up Olympus?” Caesar implies that he is equal to the Olympians, and they, to teach him a lesson, send the senators to stab him. By including this line, Shakespeare provides…

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We Real Cool

    • 387 Words
    • 1 Page

    It represents the togetherness of the boys until the end when they die because their way of life will certainly end in death.…

    • 387 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays