Preview

Fiedler’s Contingency Theory Applied to Nursing

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1222 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fiedler’s Contingency Theory Applied to Nursing
Fiedler’s Contingency Theory Applied to Nursing
Bethany McQueen
Olivet Nazarene University
Leadership and Management in Nursing
BSN 118 NRSG 463
Beth Michalesko, Professor
February 10, 2011

Fiedler’s Contingency Theory Applied to Nursing
In order to determine the type of leader one will become, it is necessary to know the different styles of leadership exist and how they are used. It is also necessary to understand one’s self to know which style is most fitting. There are several theories that have been identified to describe leadership, including, but not limited to, Trait, Style, Situational-Contingency, and Transformational (Yoder-Wise, 2007, p. 10-11). Many of these theories can be broken down to more specific theories based on the theorist(s) who developed them. Of special interest is Fiedler’s Contingency Theory of Leadership.
The basic premise of Fiedler’s Contingency Theory can be summed up as “contingent upon the interaction of the leader’s orientation and the favorableness of the group task situation” (Rice & Chemers, 1973, p. 281). This is quite reminiscent of the nursing process, which focuses on assessing a situation, diagnosing the problem, planning an intervention, implementing the intervention, and evaluating the outcome. A leader using Fiedler’s theory will assess the problem and adapt his or her behaviors based on the situation and the people involved (Yoder-Wise, 2007, p. 11). There is a strong emphasis on the relationship between the leader and the followers, and how this relationship affects the behaviors of the leader. A leader’s orientation can be described by measuring the “esteem of the least preferred co-worker” scale (Chemers & Skrzypek, 1972, p. 172). This scale, developed by Feidler, “asks the individual to think of all of the individuals with whom he has ever worked and to rate the one person with whom he could work least well” (Chemers & Skrzypek, 1972, p. 172). Based on how the “least preferred



References: Bons, P. M., & Fiedler, F. E. (1976). Changes in organizational leadership and the behavior of relationship- and task-motivated leaders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 453-473. Retrieved February 10, 2011 from EBSCOhost. Chemers, M. M., & Skrzypek, G. J. (1972). Experimental test of the contingency model of leadership effectiveness. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 24(2), 172-177. Retrieved February 10, 2011 from EBSCOhost. Rice, R. W., Bender, L., & Vitters, A. G. (1982). Testing the validity of the contingency model for female and male leaders. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 3(4), 231-247. Retrieved February 10, 2011 from EBSCOhost. Rice, R. W., & Chemers, M. M. (1973). Predicting the emergence of leaders using Fiedler’s contingency model of leadership effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 281-287. Retrieved February 10, 2011 from EBSCOhost. Rice, R. W., & Kastenbaum, D. R. (1983). The contingency model of leadership: Some current issues. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 4(4), 373-392. Retrieved February 10, 2011 from EBSCOhost. Taylor, R. (2009). Leadership theories and the development of nurses in primary health care. Primary Health Care, 19(9), 40-46. Retrieved February 10, 2011 from EBSCOhost. Yoder-Wise, P. (2007). Leading and managing in nursing (4th ed.). St Louis: Mosby-Elsevier.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After Team A reviewed and discussed Fiedler's Contingency Model, we agreed that the roles and responsibilities of task- motivated and relationship motivated leaders seem very similar. This theory is based on the idea that leaders cannot change their style of leadership.…

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ldr 531 Week 1

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Trait Approach assumes that some people are natural leaders and examines motives, values, personality, and skills. The Behavior Approach branches into two sections. One method to the Behavior Approach is to look at leader behavior. What does the leader actually do? The other portion of the Behavior approach is to determine what actions are helpful and what actions are less helpful for leaders. The Power-Influence Approach looks at leadership from the perspective of power. This approach asks the questions like, “What type of power does the leader have in regards to the followers?” This approach looks at the amount and type of influence the leader has on the people around him or her. The situational approach looks at the situation leader must deal with. This approach examines the mission of the unit, the type of organization the leader is a part of, and the nature of the work environment. The Integrative Approach involves multiple types of approaches. Participative Approach involves both the behavior and the power-influence approach. Participate leadership involves the group in decision-making and creates a sense of project ownership by the group. Members who feel empowered are more committed to mission accomplishment. For these reasons, the Participative Approach is the desired…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Study: Two Coaches

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Fiedler’s contingency model is designed to help the leader be interactive with their subordinates. The contingency model suggest that it can be determined if they will be effective in a specific setting. The two coaches that are in the case studies are effective in their approach to leadership when it comes to producing winning teams. After carefully reviewing both coaches situation it was obvious that Coach Knight would score low in the LPCs, this low score would mean that he was task driven. Then there is Coach Krzyzewski, he fits the situation where he would score a high LPC because he is motivated through relationships. Both coaches are matched well with their situation. For an example, Coach Knight¸ the highly successful basketball coach confirms Fiedler’s contingency because he is consistent in his leadership approach. Coach Knight’s intense and task-oriented technique seems unvarying. He intensely argues with referees during games and gets very upset to the point where he acts out during games. Coach Knight’s primary goal was to accomplish the task at hand and his minor needs were to build relationships while getting along with others. On the other hand, there is Coach Krzyzewski who spent time getting into his players head in order to understand their…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hughes et al 2014 defined leadership behaviors as actions taken in response to situations. Behaviors were defined as a function of personality, knowledge, experience, traits, intelligence attitudes, values, and interests. Available literature suggests that while some traits are common across studies, the overall findings suggest that leaders in one situation may not necessarily be leaders in all situations. According to the contingency theory approach,…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conger, J. A. (1990). The dark side of leadership [Electronic version]. Organizational Dynamics, 19(2), 44-55.…

    • 15014 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    welcome

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Contingency theory to understanding leadership effectiveness attempts to combine elements of both trait and situational theory.…

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Doyle, M. E., & Smith, M. K. (2001). Classical models of managerial leadership: Trait, behavioral, contingency and transformational theory. Retrieved from Infed Web site: http://www.infed.org/leadership/tradional_leadership.htm.…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership Fred

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fiedler believes a key factor in leadership success is the individual’s basic leadership style. So he begins by trying to find out what that basic style is. Fiedler created the least preferred coworkers (LPC) questionnaire for this purpose; it purports to measure whether a person is task or relationship oriented. The LPC questionnaire contains sets of 16 contrasting adjectives (such as pleasant – unpleasant, efficient-inefficient, open- guarded, supportive-hostile). It asks respondents to think of all the co-workers they have ever had and to describe the one person they last enjoyed working with by rating that person on a scale of 1 to 8 for each of the 16 sets of contrasting adjectives. Fiedler believes that based on the respondents answers to this LPC questionnaire he can determine their basic leadership style. If the least preferred coworkers is described in relatively positive terms (a high LPC score), then the respondent is primary interested in good personal relations with his coworkers. That is, if you essentially describe the person you are least able to work with in favorable terms Fiedler would label you relationship-oriented. In contrast, if the least preferred coworkers are seen in relatively unfavorable terms (allow LPC score) the respondent is primarily interested in productivity and thus would be labeled task oriented. About 16 percent of respondents score in the middle range. Such individuals cannot be classified as either relationship oriented or task oriented and thus fall outside the theory’s predictions. The rest of our discussion therefore relates to the 84 percent who score in either the high or low range of the LPC.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Contingency Model was created by Fred Fiedler in 1967; it states that the leader 's effectiveness is based on situational contingencies defined by two aspects: leadership style and situational favorableness (Miller, 2004). This model utilizes an instrument to measure an individual 's leadership orientation. The scores are ranked and leaders defined as Least Preferred Co-Worker (low-LPC or high-LPC leaders. Fiedler 's theory is that leaders have natural styles and, consequently, companies need to change the leader 's environment to suit that particular style (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2003).…

    • 2245 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thompson, G., & Vecchio, R. P. (2009). Situational leadership theory: A test of three versions. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), 837-848.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Leadership Style

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hackman, J., & Wageman, R. (2007). Asking the Right Questions About Leadership. American Psychologist, 62(1), 43-47.…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Servant Leadership

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Antoine, P. (n.d.). Fiedler 's Contingency Theory of Leadership. Retrieved May 8, 2014 from…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Although there is no conclusive, comprehensive definition of leadership, there has been advances in researching leadership theories that have been uncovered and carried out over the last 200 years. In the late 1800s, the trait theory permeated the leadership theory. The World War era saw the beginning of the contingency/situation leadership theories of Fiedler, Vroom-Yetton, and Hersey-Blanchard. In the 1950s, the research turned toward behavioral leadership theories. Many researchers started to use rating skills and conduct interviews to identify the specific behaviors…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Leadership Characteristics

    • 4142 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Dessler, G., (1976) Leadership and Supervision, Organisation and Management: Contingency Approach, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Publication.…

    • 4142 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leader orientation. Fiedler's definition of the leader's orientation emerged largely from earlier studies in which leaders were classified as either relation-ship-oriented or task-oriented. Relationship-oriented leaders look at others as coworkers and see close interpersonal relations as a requirement for accom-plishing the task. Task-oriented leaders show a strong emotional reaction against people with whom they have difficulty working. If they are forced to make a choice between getting the job done or worrying about interpersonal relations, they choose the task first and worry about interpersonal relations later. Following earlier research, Fiedler suggested that individuals could be placed along one continuum characterized by two basic leader orientations:…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays