Preview

Leadership Fred

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
649 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Leadership Fred
The first comprehensive contingency model for leadership was developed by Fred Fiedler. The Fiedler contingency model proposes that effective group performance depends on the proper match between the leader’s style and the degree to which the situation gives control to the leader.
Identifying Leadership Style:
Fiedler believes a key factor in leadership success is the individual’s basic leadership style. So he begins by trying to find out what that basic style is. Fiedler created the least preferred coworkers (LPC) questionnaire for this purpose; it purports to measure whether a person is task or relationship oriented. The LPC questionnaire contains sets of 16 contrasting adjectives (such as pleasant – unpleasant, efficient-inefficient, open- guarded, supportive-hostile). It asks respondents to think of all the co-workers they have ever had and to describe the one person they last enjoyed working with by rating that person on a scale of 1 to 8 for each of the 16 sets of contrasting adjectives. Fiedler believes that based on the respondents answers to this LPC questionnaire he can determine their basic leadership style. If the least preferred coworkers is described in relatively positive terms (a high LPC score), then the respondent is primary interested in good personal relations with his coworkers. That is, if you essentially describe the person you are least able to work with in favorable terms Fiedler would label you relationship-oriented. In contrast, if the least preferred coworkers are seen in relatively unfavorable terms (allow LPC score) the respondent is primarily interested in productivity and thus would be labeled task oriented. About 16 percent of respondents score in the middle range. Such individuals cannot be classified as either relationship oriented or task oriented and thus fall outside the theory’s predictions. The rest of our discussion therefore relates to the 84 percent who score in either the high or low range of the LPC.
Fiedler assumes

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Leadership trait is measured by a rating scale of 1-8 bipolar adjectives, with 1 being very poor and 8 being very good. The leader is then asked to identify any one member of a team the leader had to work with and did not get along well who is called the least preferred co-worker (LPC). If the leader scored the LPC very low (largely negative rating) then the leader is task oriented. If the leader scored the LPC very high (largely positive rating)…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiedler put forward his situational theory in 1958. He proposed that leadership was dependent upon the situation and assumed that all leaders are affected by an inherent set of leadership behaviours, which he believed was difficult to change. He identified two basic leadership styles which were task or relationship orientated. According to Tulsian and Pandey (2008) leaders who are task orientated will perform at the best level when they are in favourable or highly unfavourable situations, whereas leaders who are relationship orientated will perform best when they are in situations of medium…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Leadership Style

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Fiedler’s research demonstrates, in essence, if you don’t fit the team mold, you are unfit to lead the team. The contingency model asserts that leadership styles can be gauged by the Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) scale. This model posits leadership styles on a spectrum ranging from task motivated, low LPC, or relationship motivated, high LPC. The contingency aspect ties the leadership styles to situational variables of the organization.…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Teacher

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In order to become more informed about specific leadership styles that are commonly used in an organization, the Wiley Schermerhorn: Management Self-Assessment tool was utilized to assist in defining areas of strength. With the information provided and the assessment results obtained, there was an easy comprehensive interpretation of what the results meant. Table 1 provides the Profile of Personality Characteristics and Assessment Results. This information assists in determining how personality characteristics help shape how we lead in organizations.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Study: Two Coaches

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Fiedler’s contingency model is designed to help the leader be interactive with their subordinates. The contingency model suggest that it can be determined if they will be effective in a specific setting. The two coaches that are in the case studies are effective in their approach to leadership when it comes to producing winning teams. After carefully reviewing both coaches situation it was obvious that Coach Knight would score low in the LPCs, this low score would mean that he was task driven. Then there is Coach Krzyzewski, he fits the situation where he would score a high LPC because he is motivated through relationships. Both coaches are matched well with their situation. For an example, Coach Knight¸ the highly successful basketball coach confirms Fiedler’s contingency because he is consistent in his leadership approach. Coach Knight’s intense and task-oriented technique seems unvarying. He intensely argues with referees during games and gets very upset to the point where he acts out during games. Coach Knight’s primary goal was to accomplish the task at hand and his minor needs were to build relationships while getting along with others. On the other hand, there is Coach Krzyzewski who spent time getting into his players head in order to understand their…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiedler’s contingency model actually focuses on the two most important things in leadership styles. 1. Why, in particular situations some leaders will become more effective than other leaders even though they have equal credentials, and 2. Why a particular leader may be effective in one situation but not in another. Like the trait approach, Fiedler’s theory acknowledged that personal characteristics influence the effectiveness of leaders and he was particularly interested in the styles of leadership, and how a person approaches being a leader. Basically Fiedler considers leadership styles to be relatively fixed or enduring. He stated that leaders cannot be “taught” to be relationship oriented or task oriented, nor can a leader alter his or her style according to the situation. Their managers must either change the situation to fit the leader or put the leader somewhere where they will be effective.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Leadership Quiz Paper

    • 4345 Words
    • 18 Pages

    31. Contingency leadership theories attempt to combine the trait and behavioral theories to explain successful, influencing leader-follower relationships.…

    • 4345 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the investigation of the various characteristics and styles of leadership the emphasis of the style approach is the focus on the actions and behavioral characteristics of the leader. There are two behaviors of the style approach that researchers have observed: task behaviors and relationship behaviors (Northouse, 2007). People who are in roles of leadership should possess both behaviors to be successful in their position and maintain motivation and the quest for achievement in their subordinates. Task behaviors are those traits that keep others motivated to work to complete objectives. Relationship behaviors are characteristics and actions that leaders possess that make others feel respected and want to work towards goals. Unlike other approaches to leadership, such as the trait approach, the style approach looks at a leader’s behaviors and actions. Balancing these two behaviors is the key to being an effective leader (Northouse, 2007). On page 86 of Northouse’s text, “Leadership: Theory and Practice”, I completed the style questionnaire and this report will detail the results of my questionnaire and how I will utilize this information when assuming a leadership position.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Makes a Good Leader

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Another element to consider when evaluating leaders is the situation in which they are attempting to lead. Fiedler’s contingency theory is one theory that examines these situations and states that in order to maximize performance; leaders must be matched to the situation that best fits their leadership style. While…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    My Life Styles Inventory

    • 5379 Words
    • 22 Pages

    According to the LSI results, the customized interpretation of the affiliative scale measures a degree of commitment to forming and sustaining satisfying relationships (http://www.humansynergistics.com/system/affiliative.aspx). This is an accurate description of how I think about relationships in my life. In grade school, classmates would constantly try to pick fights with me and I always had to defend myself. I often questioned who my friends were because the people who I thought were my friends would turn on me in an instant. From that point, I have had the need to build strong, meaningful relationships with people and I have a strong desire to be well-liked by others. I value relationships above everything else, and will go out of my way to help people. I am, considerably, more comfortable with people who I have strong, emotional, and social ties to. I have tried to develop strong relationships with coworkers, customers, and new acquaintances when the opportunity arises. I am committed to developing lasting, amicable working relationships with…

    • 5379 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Least Preferred Co-Worker (LPC) scale is used to measure the intensity of this leadership style by asking a leader a series of questions which will ask them to think of all the people with whom they have ever worked and then describe the person with whom they have worked least well. Leaders who score high on this scale are described as relationship oriented, and those who score low on the scale are identified as task oriented.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Contingency Model was created by Fred Fiedler in 1967; it states that the leader 's effectiveness is based on situational contingencies defined by two aspects: leadership style and situational favorableness (Miller, 2004). This model utilizes an instrument to measure an individual 's leadership orientation. The scores are ranked and leaders defined as Least Preferred Co-Worker (low-LPC or high-LPC leaders. Fiedler 's theory is that leaders have natural styles and, consequently, companies need to change the leader 's environment to suit that particular style (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2003).…

    • 2245 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leadership Styles

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages

    LEADERSHIP STYLES tion to the California Psychological Inventory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1972, 56, 341-346. Kruskal, J. B. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 1964, 29, 1-27. Lingoes, J. C. The Gittt man-Lingoes nonmetric program series, Ann Arbor, Mich.: Mathesis Press, 1973.…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fiedler Contingency Model

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The contingency theory allows for predicting the characteristics of the appropriate situations for effectiveness. Three situational components determine the favourableness of situational control:…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lsi Assignment

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When I took the LSI I was it recognized two strong personal thinking styles. My primary (highest percentile score) and back-up (second highest percentile score) personal thinking styles are oppositional and dependent. The oppositional scale measures ones tendency to use the defensive and aggressive strategy of disagreeing with others, and to seek attention by being critical and cynical. Oppositional people typically love to argue and have a fear of getting close to people. In general, this style is characterized by: the ability to ask tough, probing questions, a tendency to make others feel uncomfortable, a tendency to seem aloof and detached from people, and a need to look for flaws in everything.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays