Family Systems Theory Paper

The last decade has developed a couple of concepts that played an important role in the understanding of gene environment interaction and resilience. These two concepts are the "differential sensitivity» (differential sensitivity) and "biological sensitivity» (biological sensitivity) (Belsky & Pluess, 2009). The differential sensitivity to the environment refers to the fact that individuals differ in their developmental plasticity or their plasticity to both positive and negative experiences. This means that the characteristics of individuals that make them more vulnerable to adversity often, are less likely to benefit from supportive environments (Belsky et al, as noted in (Masten & Cichetti, 2016).
Theoretically accordance with Pluess and Belsky (2013) may be "sensitive" children respond
Although the resistance has been studied at family level in recent decades, the theory and research in family resilience is not incorporated in the literature on child resistance at individual level (Masten & Monn, 2015). This is surprising, as the individual and family resilience has many common roots, including the general systems theory (von Bertalanffy, as referred to Masten & Cichetti, 2016). This can occur, because until now the family resilience more focused on family therapy and practice as directly related to family systems theory (Nichols, 2013).
In research on child resistance at individual level, the family is considered that protects and supports the normal development of the child. Instead, the scope of family resilience adaptation focuses on the family as a unit, in adverse situations that threaten the family functions and protective of procedures. These protective processes support family resilience and facilitate recovery of the family when the crisis occurs such as a divorce or family conflict (Masten & Monn, 2015. Nichols,