Preview

Examine Karl Marx' Sociological Critique of Religion

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1693 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examine Karl Marx' Sociological Critique of Religion
Examine Karl Marx' sociological critique of religion. (18)
Karl Marx was born on the 5th of May 1818 and died on the 14th of March 1883. He was a German philosopher, economist, sociologist, historian, journalist and revolutionary socialist. Throughout time, his ideas played a significant role in the development and understanding of social science and the socialist movement, however I will focus on Karl Marx’s views on religion; particularly his critique of religion.
According to Karl Marx, religion is like a social institution as it is dependent upon the material and economic realities in a given society. It is apparently the ‘creature of productive forces,’ as Marx wrote, ‘The religious world is but the reflex of the real world.’ Marx believed that all religious, moral and political life that exists is rooted in economics. He stated that people have needs and desires (material and social etc) and society structures itself to meet those needs and desires. Due to this belief, this has given rise to a capitalist society, where the workers produce goods and services and rich industrialists and landowners profit from their labours.
Marx believed that religion can be understood in relation to other social systems and the economic structures of society. He believed that religion is dependent upon economics and nothing else – in fact, the idea and uses of religious doctrines are even somewhat irrelevant. So, in simpler terms, this is actually a functionalist interpretation of religion: understanding religion is dependent upon what social purpose religion itself serves, not the actual content of its beliefs.
Karl Marx’s opinion on religion is that it is an illusion that basically provides a reason to keep society running just as it is – and religion takes our highest dreams, hopes and aspirations and alienates us from them, enclosing them onto a higher and unknowable being that religious people call God. Marx stated three reasons for disliking religion; firstly he

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx a Marxist sees religion as an illusion and that the phenomenon of religion is part of what Marx refers to as an alienation of people which causes conflict in society. He saw society as divided into two social classes with one dominating the other. And he saw religion as promoting inequalities and class conflict in society. He argues that religion is part of a dominant ideology that is the idea that religion is a tool used by the bourgeoisie (Ruling class) to convince the working class to accept low paid jobs and so exploits the working class, reproducing and reinforcing false consciousness.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He claims that Christianity teaches ideas similar to communism, and should not be horrified by how these ideas are set in motion. Marx misunderstands that while Christianity does not encourage the accumulation of personal belongings, it also does not advocate distribution of rich peoples’ property. Christians should be ashamed of their ignorance and lack of action on behalf of the poor. However, stripping the rich of their wealth will not resolve the social issue as it effects more than the economic institutions of…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author Terrell Carver assesses the Marx’s social theory in his book (Marx’s Social Theory). This is a fascinating account of Terrell Carver about Marx’s social theory. Writer discusses the influence of Marx on almost every discipline of knowledge from aesthetics to theology, including anthropology, geography, jurisprudence, and history, almost all branches of philosophy, political science and psychology.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Marxists Disagree: Religion functions serve capitalism. Karl Marx – sees religion as an ideology that is used as a weapon by the ruling class to justify suffering of poor as ‘god-given’…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grand Inquisitor Analysis

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marx believed that religion is analogous to an opiate or an illusion of happiness that common people feel they must have to endure a world in which they do not have or are prevented from having true happiness. Plato’s view of social class dynamics was that those in power had to invent noble lies and pious frauds to keep the common people in the state of somnolence and ignorance for which they were suited. Khomeini, however, believed that religion is necessary to provide a political society with moral order and stability, something that a liberal secular society could not do. In fact, Khomeini viewed religion as a panacea for all social ills. Critics of this view argue that using religion…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This sets the idea that capitalism was directly affected by religion in the past, and without religion, capitalism may not have taken over in the way it has in the modern United States.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Max Weber disagreed with Marx’s claim that economics is the central force in social change.Weber believed that religion was the central force of social change. His conclusion came from him contrasting the Roman Catholic and Protestant belief systems. “Roman Catholics, he said, were taught that because they were members of the only true church, they were on the road to heaven. This made them comfortable with traditional ways of life.” (Henslin, pg. 8). While Roman Catholics followed their system, protestants undermined the spiritual security of its followers and motivated them to embrace change. Protestants that were under the Calvinist tradition didn’t even know if they were saved until…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedrich Nietzsche and Karl Marx were intellectuals with vastly different world views and opinions on how things should be run but the one matter in which they would both agree leaves a bad taste in their mouths is Christianity. Nietzsche see Christianity as a blight upon humans, something holding us back from our fullest potential. Karl Marx does not necessarily see Christianity as the great evil that Nietzsche makes it out to be, but he would agree that complicated monolith that is Christianity is holding us back. Both individuals want Christianity gone, but their reasoning and purposes behind make this mutual desire a little less mutual. Friedrich Nietzsche makes it fairly obvious from his book “Twilight of the Idols” that he shares no deep love for religion but the religion he seems to harbor the most hate for is Christianity.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Charles Cooley

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages

    4.) Smith, Cyril. 2005. “Marx Myths and Legends”. Karl Marx and Religion. WEBSITE accessed March 21, 2012. http://marxmyths.org/cyril-smith/article2.htm…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper, I will be addressing the topic of how Christianity and Marxism cannot be yoked together. Let me first state that the kind of Christianity Paulo Freire says he believes in, is Catholicism. The Catholic Church tends to have beliefs that are not completely true to the Word of God because they take some scripture out of context. I do not claim to be of any certain doctrine of Christianity; however, I do claim that I am a Bible believing Christian. Everything I believe comes directly from the Bible and without distorting its words; I believe exactly what it says. For this reason, I have a problem with Freire’s belief system.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx’s plan for reforming society may be more tangible than Kuyper’s, but his plan uses rather cruel and destructive tactics. For instance, Marx believes that the family has become an instrument of oppression and should be eliminated. Marx’s plan for consolidating the family directly contradicts biblical principles and is no less than an attempt to undermine God’s authority. Marx believes the family is merely a product of the class system and not a God ordained institution. Besides Marx’s cruel elimination of the family, his plan further feeds man’s greed and selfishness. Communism’s prohibition of private property claims to produce economic equality. However, this notion seems only to further feed man unhealthy relationship with the material world and denies God his rightful place of power. Without God’s moral authority, man is left to reshape society as he sees fit but at the cost of losing all that is good. After examining Marx argument, the idea of communism does not seem to present an effective solution for resolving poverty in either Marx’s day or in the twenty-first…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two primary views on the issue of whether religion is a force for social change in society. Certain theorists adopt the view that religion is a conservative force, maintaining the status quo, whereas other theorists have the belief that religion is a force for social change, bringing about revolutions in society. With all views, the lack of a universal definition of religion remains a problem. Marx for example would argue that religion inhibits social change as it legitimises and justifies the status quo, whereas this contrasts Weber’s belief would be that religion can cause social change as it helped the development of capitalism.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx and Max Weber all offer a wide array of thoughts and ideas regarding to religion. Firstly, Emile Durkheim's views of religion will be explained. Durkheim chose to adopt the idea that if religion gave birth to everything essential in society it is because society is the soul of religion (Cosman, 1973, p. 191). Thus, Durkheim chose to view religion as a function which can strengthen social bonds whilst also integrating individuals into society. Durkheim also believed that religion is divided up into two separate sections – the sacred and the profane. The sacred consisted of rites, behavior or objects of reverence that religious belief deemed special, whilst the profane was deemed as everything and anything else in the world which did not have any religious meaning or function (Giddens 1972, p.243). Both of these categories depend on each other for survival; the sacred cannot survive without the profane to support it and vice versa. Karl Marx chose to adopt a…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Religion it the opium of the masses” is one of the most frequently paraphrased statements of the German economist Karl Marx, “the father of communism”. The meaning of this statement is that religion is the equivalent of opium (a type of drug) to make masses of people feel better. Marx quoted that “religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless wold, and the soul of the soulless condition.”…

    • 526 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Christianity Test

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Karl Marx wrote that religion is "the ___ of the people" or in other words like a crutch for the weak.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays