Preview

ethics dropbox 3

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
454 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
ethics dropbox 3
Felicia Becker
Drop Box 3
1/29/15
Business Ethics

Immanuel Kant one of the worldest's most famous modern philosophers stated my favorite quote, "Experience without theory is blind, but theory without experience is mere intellectual play." Kant believed that experience and fundamental concepts is the reasoning behind an individuals morality. His beliefs are very similar to mine and I believe that an experience people go through can help shape a person and their character. Kant's studies influenced much of the world and our life ethics. Immaneul Kant was born in 1724 in Russia into a religous family. He was in a prestigous school and received a stern education. He spent most of his adult life, working several different jobs in a ten mile radius. Kant was a very introvert type person. He was never married and had a strict daily routine. Despite being an introvert, he was a very popular teacher and a well known author before he started his career in philosophical works. He started a career at an early age at the University of Konigsberg, which as also where he attended school. He spent almost of his career life with the University. He published many philosophical works and spent much of his time in scholar research. Apart from his philosphical work he made an imporant discovery in astronomy regarding the earth's rotation. Kant's ethical works involved researching categorical imperative beliefs. He had views that we all together responsbile for our own actions and behaviors. The ultimate goal of being a morally good person is someone who has good will. Immanuel Kant's belief in good will was known as the Kantian Ethics. "The only intrinsically good things is a good will; an action can only be good, therefore, if its maxim." Every action or decision has to have the same conditons in order it for it to be universalisability. Each decision we make will be based off of which will deliever the ultimate happiness. Kant believes there is a moral code that constructs

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Good will according to Kant, is attempting to do the right thing in all situations. Kant believes that in every situation one encounters, there will always be good. I believe that although in some instances, there can be goodness; I also believe that there are certain situations in which only the bad can occur. For example, on the day of the terrorist attack on 9/11 in New York, the terrorist act was not morally correct in anyway. On his prime…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics 1010-027 4/1/13 Essay Assignment #2 Kant: Grounding for Metaphysics and Morals Immanuel Kant states that the only thing in this world that is “good without qualification” is the good will. He states the attributes of character such as intelligence, wit, and judgment are considered good but can be used for the wrong reasons. Kant also states that the attributes of good fortune such as health, power, riches, honor, that provide one happiness can also be used in the wrong way (7). In order to understand Kant’s view of moral rightness, one must understand that only a good will is unambiguously good without qualification, it is “good in itself”. To clarify, Kant states that “a good will is good not because of what it effects or accomplishes, nor because of its fitness to attain some proposed end; it is good only through its willing, i.e. it is good in itself” (7). To Kant, a good will is the only thing that gives action moral worth. Human beings were granted with reason not only to attain self-preservation and a state of happiness, but “its true function must be to produce a will which is not merely good as a mean to some further end, but it good in itself” (9). Human beings are called to exercise reason through duty to bring a universal good to all. This duty, living according to our highest reason, must be exercised through action that is beneficial and non-contradictory to all. Duty has three major qualifications for Kant. One must recognize that duty is good in itself when an action is performed out of the need of the completion of the duty itself, such as one who abstains from supporting a large restaurant corporation that inhumanely raise cattle or poultry, because he or she recognizes that it is a duty to not perpetuate unethical practice. Or one who carefully recycles their waste not because of the pleasure of being an enlightened “green” individual, but because of the recognition that it is “good in itself” to reuse products. The second…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Kant, goodwill is being able to reason and act right because it is morally right and not because of the consequences that your actions may or may not produce. In order to adhere to moral law Kant came up with a set of imperatives (commands or advice) for one to follow. His imperatives consist of Hypothetical and Categorical. Hypothetical imperatives consist of problematic imperatives and assertoric imperatives, which hypothetical imperatives say that an action is only good for some purpose. An example of a Categorical Imperative is apodeictic. Categorical imperative is a single moral command that has no other purpose or without any other end. A problematic imperative tells you how to achieve a goal. The rule follows as: If you have decided to pursue Y, then you do X. For example, if you decide to see a movie then you go online and buy tickets. Assertoric imperatives tell you how to make yourself happy. The rule follows as: since you want to be happy, do X. However, Kant does not believe that happiness is an optional goal because it is self-interest. As for apodeictic they tell you to do X without any further goal. It is an absolute instruction. However, there is THE categorical imperative that is a single moral command. It has different formulations that more or less give the same guidance. Those formulas are Universal law, Humanity, Kingdom of Ends, and Autonomy. The Universal…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant was a philosopher who lived the majority his life in the 1700's. He believed that an individual should use God, freedom, and immortality to be able to…

    • 880 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant, a soft determinist, said that in order to make a moral decision we must have freedom. Kant believed that the ability to make moral decisions lay within the existence of freedom; stating that if we are not free to make our own decisions those decisions could not be moral as we were never free to make that decision in the first place. Kant thought that a person could be blamed for an action if they could have acted differently; for example if a person’s family is held at gunpoint and they are forced to open a safe they cannot be blamed as they did not have a choice. If we are to have free will we must have the ability to make a decision that is unhindered; Kant believed that we must have free will if we are to be help morally responsible for our actions, if God did not give us free will then our decisions cannot be considered immoral or moral as we would have had to act in the way we did. Thus we cannot be held responsible; a good moral action cannot be praised as you had no other option, whilst an immoral action cannot be punished as once again there was no free choice.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Kantian standpoint does not look into consequences like the Utilitarian standpoint; instead it looks at categorical imperatives. According to founder Immanuel Kant, “the rightness or wrongness of actions does not depend on their consequences but on whether they fulfill their duty.” A Kantian belief is not based solely on what is for the greater good, but if something is seen as right or wrong to do. A good person is good because of the intentions that they have, whether enjoyable or not.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant approached towards philosophy; he developed “The Categorical Imperative” which is a rule to do what is right. He believed that we shouldn’t lie to one another; he also believed that if we made a promise we should keep that promise. “Kant argues that the moral worth of an action it’s to be judged not by its consequences but by the nature of the maxim or principles…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the prime components of Kant’s moral behavior is good will. One would be wrong to make assumptions about good will when considering the current popular concept, such as “he is nice”, “she has a good soul”, or “they are good people”. This differs from Kant’s conceptualization of good will, which considers good will as being the quality of a person who takes moral conclusions to be the…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant's Philosophy

    • 2164 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Kant’s Moral Philosophy Faafetai Ieremia Jr Kant’s Moral Philosophy Introduction Kant’s moral philosophy is also known as Kantian ethics. It is a type of a deontological theory, which is based on ethics. Immanuel Kant founded this deontological theory. Kant’s theory developed as a culmination to the enlightenment rationalism. The basic central idea of this theory is that the good will is the intrinsic quality of nature. Hence, if the action is morally good, maxim, it acts as the theory behind the duty to the moral law. Kant’s moral law gave birth to the idea of categorical imperative. According to the theory of Kant, it is an idea, which acts as a moral law applicable to all people, irrespective of what their wishes, and interests are. “Act only to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2008).…

    • 2164 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immanuel Kant Vs Aquinas

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Contrary to Aquinas was a much less compelling philosopher Immanuel Kant. Kant lived what some said to be a remarkable life; his philosophical work includes critique or practical reason and fundamental principles of metaphysic morals (79). However while some might believe that Kants philosophy was much more compelling than Aquinas I believe that Kant philosophy was flawed and lacked validity. Kant talks a lot about the will of people and how it is not the action that makes something good it is the will or the intent that makes something good he believed that “people should always act in a way that could serve as rules for anyone to act on in similar circumstances” (81). This is where I think Kant’s philosophy is flawed, this is because Kant’s…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to understand Kant’s argument, it is first crucial to grasp its underlying concepts. Kant believes that we need to consider what a person is willing to do in the calculation of whether or not his action is good. He defines “will” as a wished state of affairs. Kant thinks that will should not be restricted to possible direct actions. He states that the notion should be broad and allow for the will of something unattainable. Kant also allows will to be inconsistent. For example, it is perfectly natural to will to get a good grade on a test and to will to go to bed when you are tired, at the same time. Those are two inconsistent (and contradictory) wills that cannot be achieved at the same time, but since it is natural to have those wills, Kant allows it. He also states that will is only a characteristic of human beings. Animals only have instincts and therefore cannot will to do anything. Because will is a part of determining moral value and only humans are moral agents, only human beings can possess will. A maxim is a kind of will which governs our actions and varies from person to person. We are not always consciously aware of our maxims but can explain them if we are asked about them. There are two kinds of maxims: One is based on our desire to obtain something while the other is based on our respect for…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant believes that if people have both the virtue which is having the strength to resist bodily inclinations and happiness they could have a good life if they are doing what is right. In Chapter 9 “Are There Absolute Moral Rules? Immanuel Kant expressed the “Categorical Imperative” by saying: “Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law”(p.124). He expressed that “Categorical Imperative” is to do what is right and thinking of an action, and if there are any rules to follow for the specific action that is equal to the maxim then you must consider if you would want the rule to be a universal law. One strength for Kant would be how his theories has helped shape our legal system and our sense of moral law because without it we would be a dysfunctional society with no rules. One weakness for Kant would be he don’t care about the consequences of our…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant saw the ethical law as an all-out basic, an indisputable order, and trusted that its substance could be set up by human reason alone. Subsequently, the incomparable all out basic is: "Act just one that is said so you can be lined up at the same time according to the universal law" (). Basically, it views that having good- will, definitely have a good principle behind it. Basically, people have free will to do, feel as they please rather it’s rational or not. Opposing to the utilitarian speculations of reflective quality, mankind has learned to be moral and find direction towards the goodness in life. Learning to lead an ethical life, regardless the reasons are, even if feelings inside is differing from our true feeling inside.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Categorical Imperative

    • 2252 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Profile Immanuel Kant was born on April 22, 1724, in Kaliningrad (now Konigsburg), Russia. While tutoring, he published science papers, including "General Natural History and Theory of the Heavens" in 1755. He spent the next 15 years as a metaphysics lecturer. In 1781, he published the first part of Critique of Pure Reason. He published more critiques in the years preceding his death, on February 12, 1804, in Kaliningrad.…

    • 2252 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Explain Kant’s Moral Argument Kant’s moral argument focuses on reason, good will, duty and the notion that we ought to strive towards moral perfection (Summum Bonum). He believes that people are ruled by a ‘moral law’. This moral law for Kant was universal and objective. An example of this might be seen in the wide scale agreement that murder or torture is wrong. There seems to be agreement across cultures that certain actions are intrinsically wrong. This, for Kant, suggests that there is a universal objective moral law. He believed that the highest form of goodness was the notion of good will, namely that someone would freely choose to do good for no reward whatsoever, only for the sake of goodness. Moreover, Kant believed that we have a moral duty to do such good things. He would argue that we have an awareness of what is right and wrong and that good will should make us act accordingly as reason dictates this to be the case. In a way it doesn’t make any rational sense to act in an immoral way.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays