Ethical Theory Vs Natural Rights Ethics

Out of all the ethical theories, natural rights ethics is the best overall theory. Natural rights theory is the best theory because it stays consistent and promotes equality among people. Also, the natural rights theory can help people maintain their dignity by allowing their rights to not be taken away. There are theories that are not as adequate as natural rights theory. Mill’s utilitarianism, Kantian deontology, and virtue ethics have flaws. Natural rights theory is better than the others theories for multiple reasons. Natural rights first appeared in the seventeenth century as a demand for equality of all people. Natural rights ethics argues that all humans have rights apart from their membership in a civil society or political site. Rights are self evident and God given. All humans have rights. One does not have to qualify or earn rights
The term deontology comes from the Greek word deon, which means duty. Deontology believes that duty is the basis of morality. This theory believes that moral principles are universal. When discerning and applying moral principles, reason is important. In deontology, the moral community consists of all rational beings. Deontology states that some acts are always wrong, even if the act leads to an admirable outcome. Actions in deontology are always judged independently of their outcome. An act can be morally bad but may unintentionally lead to a favorable outcome. Deontology tends to focus too much on justice and abstract principles and ignore moral sentiments such as caring. Deontology does not take into account the emotions involved in making moral decisions. Deontology does not allow for looking at the consequences of one's actions and therefore seems more suited to a theoretical life rather than a practical one. Deontology is therefore not an adequate