Preview

Enterpreneurship Pdf

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8973 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Enterpreneurship Pdf
Individuals and Opportunities: A resource-based and institutional view of entrepreneurship

Nikolina Fuduric Aalborg University Department of Development and Planning Ph.D. Supervisor: Professor Anne Lorentzen

January 2008 Luzern, Switzerland
1

ABSTRACT Individual and Opportunities: A resource-based and institutional view of entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurial activity holds many promises for economic well-being. Some of the most well-documented promises are economic growth and job creation. Considering entrepreneurship’s potential in creating jobs and economic growth, one would think that it is an ideal strategy to use in those places that need it the most; in the economically depleted regions of the world. The answer is yes and no. It is an ideal strategy because a healthy entrepreneurial base has far-reaching effects on the economy and society. It is not an ideal strategy if the human and institutional resource base is weak. Since entrepreneurship is a socially constructed phenomenon, it will only be as robust as the people practicing it and the institutional environment in which it is enacted. This paper has two goals. The first is to examine human capabilities and the institutional environment as a set of resources giving rise to different processes and forms of entrepreneurship. The second goal is to consider how novel (Schumpeterian) and non-novel (Kirznerian) forms of entrepreneurship are affected by resources on these levels. Two theoretical platforms aid in this consideration: Edith Penrose’s resource-based theory of firm growth and Douglas North’s Theory of Institutions and Institutional Change. Penrose’s theory supports the notion of the development of individual resources since the entrepreneur functions as a firm and is engaging in an individual process and not a collective one. His personal resources are anchored in his psychological traits and capability set. Douglas North and his Theory of Institutions and Institutional Change provide us with the



Bibliography: Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., & Feldman, M. (1994). R&D Spillovers and Recipient Firm Size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 336-340. Acs, Z., & Storey, D. J. (2004). Entrepreneurship and Economic Development. Regional Studies, 38(8), 871-877. Acs, Z., & Varga, A. (2006). How is Entrepreneurship Good for Economic Growth? Innovations, Winter, 97-106. Alvarez, S., & Busenitz, L. (2001). The Entrepreneurship of Resource-Based Management. Journal of Management, 27, 755-775. Amit, R., Glosten, L., & et.al. (1993). Challenges to Theory Development in Entrepreneurship Research. Journal of Management Studies, 30, 815-834. Becattini, G. (2000). Industrial Districts. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier. Benneworth, P. (2003). The micro-dynamics of learning networks: how local actors contest "peripherality". Paper presented at the Reinventing regions in the global economy. Benneworth, P. (2004). In what sense 'regional development? ': Entrepreneurship, underdevelopment and strong tradition in the periphery. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16, 439-458. Bruyat, C., & Julien, P. (2001). Defining the Field of Research in Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(165-180). Busenitz, L., West III, P., & et.al. (2003). Entrepreneurship Research in Emergence: Past Trends and Future Direction. Journal of Management, 29, 285-308. Bygrave, W., & Hofer, C. (1991). Theorizing about Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Winter, 13-22. Casson, M. (1982). The Entrepreneur. Oxford: Martin Robertson. 24 Chiles, T., Bluedorn, A., & Gupta, V. (2007). Beyond Creative Destruction and Entrepreneurial Discovery: A Radical Austrian Approach to Entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 28(4), 467-493. Delmar, F., & Davidson, P. (2000). Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12, 1-23. Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. New York: Harper and Row. Ebner, A. (2006). Institutions, entrepreneurship and the rationale of government: An outline of the Schumpeterian theory of state. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 59(4), 497-515. Fuduric, N. (2008). The Sources of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Aalborg University. Gartner, W. B. (1988). "Who is an Entrepreneur?" is the wrong question. American Small Business Journal, Spring, 11-31. GEM. (2006). Summary Results. Hitt, M., Ireland, R., & et.al. (2001). Guest editors ' introduction to the special issue of strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 475-491. Hofstede, G., Nooderhaven, N., Thurik, R., Uhlaner, L., Wennekers, A., & Wildeman, R. (2004). Culture 's Role in Entrepreneurship: Self Employment out of Dissatisfaction [Electronic Version]. Ireland, R., Hitt, M., & et.al. (2001). Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management thinking to create firm wealth. Academy of Management Executive, 15, 49-63. Johannisson, B., Ramirez-Pasillas, M., & Karlsson, G. (2002). The institutional embeddedness of local inter-firm networks: a leverage for business creation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 14, 297-315. Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL, US: University of Chicago Press. Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60-85. Knight, F. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: Kelly and Millman. Krackhardt, D. (1995). Entrepreneurial opportunities in an entrepreneurial firm: A structural approach. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Spring(53-69). Langlois, R. (2003). Schumpeter and the obsolescence of the entrepreneur Austrian Economics and Entrepreneurial Studies 6, 283-298. Low, M. B., & Abrahamson, E. (1997). Movements, bandwagons, and clones: Industry evolution and the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 435457. McClelland, D. C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ: van Nostrand. Milne, A. A., & Shepard, E. H. (2001). The Complete Tales of Winnie-the-Pooh. New York: Dutton Children 's Books. North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Cambridge University Press. Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 25 Ronning, L. (2006). The creation and destruction of social capital: entrepreneurship, cooperative movements, and institutions. International Small Business Journal, 24(2). Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and Effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243-263. Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Schumpeter, J. (1947). The Creative Response in Economic History. Journal of Economic History, 7, 149-159. Scott, R. W. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. London: Sage. Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448-469. Shane, S. (2003). A General Theory of Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The Promise of Entreprenership as a Field of Research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226. Smallbone, D., North, D., & Kalantaridis, C. (1997). Survival and Growth of manufacturing SME 's. Salisbury: Rural Development Commission. Stevenson, H., & Jarillo, J. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17-27. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in inter-firm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administration Science Quarterly, 42, 35-67. Vaughn, K. (1994). Austrian Economics in America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Venkataraman, S. (1997). The Distinctive Domain of Entrepreneurship Research. London: Jai Press. Verheul, I., Wennekers, S., Audretsch, D., & Thurik, R. (2001). An Eclectic Theory of Entrepreneurship: Policies, Institutions & Culture. Paper presented at the Timbergen Institute Papers. West III, P. (2003). Connecting Levels of Analysis in Entrepreneurship Research: A focus on information processing, assymetric knowledge, and networks. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Wilken, P. (1975). Entrepreneurship: A Comparative and Historical Study. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Witt, U. (1992). Turning Austrian economics into an evolutionary theory. Boston: Kluwer. 26

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful