Preview

Enemy of the People

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1115 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Enemy of the People
ESSAY: AN ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE
Harry Latirofian

07/SP_CORE_1006_22 The Global Challenge

An Enemy of the people is a drama filled with ethical dilemmas and issues that are largely were caused by the contrasts between the Stockmann brothers. Thomas Stockmann is jovial by nature and likes to be surrounded by people like him that are intelligent and hard working. His brother in other hand is a representative of the conservative world-order. Thomas Stockmann or as he referred in play as Dr. Stockmann is very conscious of his duty as a citizen and he isn’t afraid to go against the mob of arrogant people, which are the majority in that town, and to point out that they are in denial: “Dr. Stockmann: …The majority has might on its side--unfortunately; but right it has not. I am in the right--I and a few other scattered individuals. The minority is always in the right.” (pg. 71, Act IV), but Peter Stockmann, on the other hand, is the person who can sway the mob to his side, by saying what the mob wants to hear. We can see more clearly the difference between two brother if we would consider their’s personalities from the deontological point of view. One is a doctor, who would have to give a Hippocratic Oath in order to practice and it is well known that one of the key elements of the Hippocratic Oath is to help people with all your knowledge: “…. I will apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm and injustice. I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect.”(Hippocratic Oath). And the other one is the politician, who had to step over many people in order to get the position that he has, such people as Morten Kiil: “Well, it wouldn't be a bad thing. It would just serve them right, and teach them a lesson. They think themselves so much cleverer than we old fellows. They hounded me out of the council; they did, I tell you--they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Allegory Man of the PeoplePlato utilizes The Allegory of the Cave in his writings The Public. It is a depiction of the nature of the education of man and the need for education in the society. Robert Bolt wrote the second play, The Man for All Season, and finally, the third writing, An Enemy of the People, is written by Henrik Ibsen. A comparison will also be made between the lead characters of the last two plays. The writer will compare Sir Thomas More from A Man for All Seasons with Dr. Thomas Stockmann, the lead character from An Enemy of the People. A comparison between the characters of the two men will reveal that Sir More is a greater man than Dr. Stockmann.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cosi Fan Tutte

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When the group an individual is associated with doesn’t accept them, this may cause them to feel unwanted and unable to move forward in life. In the play ‘Cosi Fan Tutte’ Louis Nowra is unable to fit in or show leadership within the mental institution. This is displayed through the characters vulgar language “Couldn’t direct a poofter to a man’s dunny.” The use of inhibited directness in “poofter” shows the character of Doug doesn’t know how to act around ‘sane’ people and this directness of the word ‘poofter’ shows the groups’ truthful feelings toward Lewis. This is further emphasised by humour in “For killing an actor he’d get life, for killing a director he’d get eternal gratitude.” Roy’s criticism toward Lewis is evident throughout the entire play, and causes Lewis to feel degraded and put down. When an individual begins to come to terms with the cards they’ve been dealt, they may move forward in not only their career, but also their initial self.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Henery Essay

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henry begins his speech assertively with “No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as the abilities of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the house. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; …I should speak forth my sentiments freely, and without reserve.” Immediately, Henry implements Pathos. Henry is aware that in order for a group of irritated colonist to believe him, he must first present himself as honorable. Henry beckons the audience more with, “Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, …the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.” Personality, seasoned with the refusal to wither the truth-despite others opinions- and enveloped in religious assertiveness, allows for the acceptance of ideas intertwined with the openness to change.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the dust settled in Europe, collaborators were hung, sent running naked down the streets or imprisoned, while the resistance set out to define post-war Europe. The illusion of a clear distinction between Hitler’s henchmen and enemies shaped the psychology, language and power structures that are still present today. Collaboration and resistance, as categories of human behaviour, gained their historical relevance from the weight they carried after the war, rather than the limited part they played in bringing the conflict to an end. In reality, the decision to collaborate was, as choices always are, the individual’s response to his or hers perceived alternatives. It existed within every stratum, and along the entire scale of what is considered good and evil. It came in endless variations, and due to as many motivations. I will, however, argue that self-interest was the most important motivating factor. To avoid exaggerated emphasis on those in charge, I will return to the so called horizontal collaborators, who were often the first to be punished. Not only are their stories as personal as they can get, but their motivations can, with a tiny bit of imagination, be applied to every chunk of society. Also, in order to remain focused on the driving force behind collaboration, I will base my argument on the most crucial motivating factors: self preservation; the dissatisfaction with previous institutions; the common enemy; internal conflict; ideological similarities; and self-interest.…

    • 2547 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The conflict created when the will of an individual opposes the will of the majority is a recurring feature of drama.”…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many parallels that can be found between Henrik Ibsen’s An Enemy of the People and Steven Spielberg’s Jaws. Both follow respected men who go against authority and majority opinion to save the lives of the people around them. These productions are iconic in their field, but it is not because of their story but because of their message: Tyranny of the Majority and Dangers of Ignorance. In An Enemy of the People there is pollution in the water, in Jaws, Spielberg chooses to poison the water with sharks. Before the realization of the poisons in the water, both of their jobs had been relatively calm and nothing tragic had happened in either towns. In both of these works there is political satire that caused the immediate hatred of both productions, now they are regarded as ingenious pieces…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enter here Envision a middle aged man that the night before had sat down with his family for dinner. This same man is now being told to do horrific things in the name of his country. Is this man a monster or is he just an ordinary man. This is what is up for debate in Bowing’s book Ordinary Man. Browning state that he believes that these are just ordinary men and throw a variety of different reasons they were forces and overall persuaded to commit awful acts against fellow human beings. There is proof that he was correct that these were just ordinary men. It also might be surprising that this book would show that most if not all men could ultimately come to do the awful actions described thought out the book.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Ku Klux Klan people haven 't gotten out of the idea the black people…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible the audience is supplied with an array of varying characters. Arthur Miller effectively categorizes the characters of the play into two juxtaposing categories; the accusers, and the accused. The accusers are led by the antagonist of the play, Abigail Williams, whereas the accused are led by the protagonist of the play, John Proctor. The audience sympathizes with John Proctor not only because he has been falsely accused, but also because he is a representation of the human condition. In contrast, Miller causes the audience to despise the accusers in order to exemplify the injustice of McCarthyism.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gilman Yellow Wallpaper

    • 6339 Words
    • 21 Pages

    If a physician of high standing, and one’s own husband, assures friends and relatives that there is really nothing the…

    • 6339 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cantway was faced with the difficult task of treating the victim and the attacker. Unbeknownst to him at the time, the two men were only a few hospital beds apart. Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath which states in part, “Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty” (“Hippocratic Oath”, 2016). Dr. Cantway knew that although one man was responsible for the other one being there, he had an obligation to treat both to the best of his ability. He may have been tempted to “let” Aaron McKinney die in his care, but his professionalism allowed him to separate his personal feelings from the situation. Karmen (2013) attributes this attitude to avoid burnout. This “protective coating of emotional detachment” (p. 173) that professionals wear, allow them to remain objective and treat many patients without becoming emotionally overwhelmed. Dr. Cantway unselfishly tended to the victims while he, himself was…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    All communities run successfully with qualities of fairness and equality. The well-being of the citizens depends on the support and guidance they receive from those with power and influence in their society. When the people become corrupt and start having intentions that do not contribute back to the community, the society will fall apart and be unable to maintain balance and stability. In William Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice and Arthur Miller’s The Crucible the reader sees examples of injustice inflicted on the victims within the plays through the people with power within the community. The Christians in The Merchant of Venice mock Shylock the Jew countless times while the high court in The Crucible believe citizens are practicing witchcraft without a proper testimony. In both situations, the Christians and the court see themselves doing the right thing and believe they are contributing to the society when in reality, they break apart the community by persecuting those that are different. The victims in William Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice and Arthur Miller’s The Crucible suffer from injustice as power being placed in the wrong hands leads to the formation of biased decision, the limited free will of citizens and severe punishments.…

    • 1684 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamlet Marxist Criticism

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Throughout the entirety of Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, if one looks carefully, one can see many aspects of Marxist thought prevalent in the story. To effectively analyze a story through a Marxist critical lens, the reader needs to pay close attention to how characters of different classes interact with one another, especially in respect to class oppression and social inequity, particularly if the actions or words of a character talk of rebellion against the upper classes. “To Marxist critics, a society's economic base determines the interests and styles of its literature; it is this relationship between determining base and determined superstructure that is the main point of interest for Marxist critics” (Abele). The analyst must also recognize to what social class the author belongs and how that might affect the portrayals of certain characters. The way in which different classes in Hamlet interact, along with how the society is actually structured, are the driving forces behind the events in the play.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abortion Argument Analysis

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the first chapter Fineman poses the question “Who is a person?”. The answer seems to be something so simple, yet it is very complex. The topic deals with humans rights given in the constitution. The question has always been prominent in our society because the founding fathers wrote a constitution the did not fit all Americans. The constitution was written for the white male. African Americans and women did not have these rights until later on in history. The question also is apparent in the abortion argument, Gary Bauer a prominent figure in the Pro-life movement fights to say unborn fetuses are people. The meaning of a person and who deserve constitutional is expanding. In history it wasn't always so easy and people had to fight for their…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two kind of the leaders in the world, one for the greater good and one for the greater evil. In this book the author portrays the evil Adolf Hitler during WWII in Jack Merridew. He was shown as the outcast , the one no one wanted. He took over with force and became chief just like how adolf Hitler did. Both of the characters resemble the evil and greed that's going on in our world. They both preyed on the weak and took over when no one paid attention.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays