Preview

East-West Schism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
255 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
East-West Schism
The East-West Schism, or Great Schism, divided Chalcedonian Christianity into Western (Latin) and Eastern (Greek) branches, i.e. Western Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy. Though normally dated to 1054, the East-West Schism was actually the result of an extended period of estrangement between Latin and Greek Christendom. The primary causes of the Schism were disputes over papal authority—Pope Leo IX claimed he held authority over the four Eastern patriarchs—and over the insertion of the filioque clause into the Nicene Creed by the Western Church. Eastern Orthodox today claim that the primacy of the Patriarch of Rome was only honorary, and that he has authority only over his own diocese and does not have the authority to change the decisions of Ecumenical Councils. There were other, less significant catalysts for the Schism, including variance over liturgical practices and conflicting claims of jurisdiction.

The Church split along doctrinal, theological, linguistic, political, and geographic lines, and the fundamental breach has never been healed. It might be alleged that the two churches actually reunited in 1274 (by the Second Council of Lyon) and in 1439 (by the Council of Basel), but in each case the councils were repudiated by the Orthodox as a whole, on the grounds that the hierarchs had overstepped their authority in consenting to reunification. Further attempts to reconcile the two bodies have failed.

Bibliography: * Byzantium: The Great Schism By Bp. Kallistos Ware * Catholic Encyclopedia article, representing a Roman Catholic view * In Our Time page with link to online talk * OrthodoxWiki: Great



Bibliography: * Byzantium: The Great Schism By Bp. Kallistos Ware * Catholic Encyclopedia article, representing a Roman Catholic view * In Our Time page with link to online talk * OrthodoxWiki: Great Schism

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    •The great schism between the Latin Church and the Orthodox Church took place in 1054, a split that still exists today.…

    • 3092 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    |Catholic Church that sought to revitalize the |Peace of Augsburg (1555)- A regions rule would determine its religion, However it |…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 9 study guide

    • 1290 Words
    • 8 Pages

    4. The schism of 1054 between the Eastern and Western churches was caused primarily by disagreements over…

    • 1290 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    History4b REVIEW Final

    • 2376 Words
    • 10 Pages

    What: split in Europe revolving around two separate popes, resolved by the Council of Constance (1414-1418) where Martin V was elected pope…

    • 2376 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Roman Catholic Church of the West established independence from political authorities; Eastern Orthodox Church did not…

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ayy lmao theory

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Byzantine culture, political organization, and economic orientation help to explain the rift between the eastern and western versions of Christianity. Different rituals grew from Greek and Latin versions of the Bible. Emperors resisted papal attempts to interfere in religious issues. Hostility greeted the effort of the Frankish king, Charlemagne, to be recognized as Roman emperor. The final break between the two churches occurred in 1054 over arguments about the type of bread used in the mass and the celibacy of priests. Even though the two churches remained separate, they continued to share a common classical heritage.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 9

    • 541 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cultural differences led to the split between the two churches. The Byzantines were more Greek-like and the Romans were good in Latin. The west accepted the pope as their leader, priest were suppose to be celibacy and eat unleavened bread. Other the outside, the east focused on outreach, priests can get married and yeast were in communion bread. Besides the differences in culture, the teachings were diverge on doctrinal points.…

    • 541 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Western Schism was a division in the Latin Christian Church between 1378 and 1416 due to rival claimants to the papacy existing in Rome and Avignon. Eventually, the papacy regained its independence and returned to Rome. The effect it had was it broke the pope’s ability to challenge the rising power of monarchies.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    in 1880, Europeans controlled 10% of Africa; by 1914, controlled all except Liberia & Ethiopia; the Berlin Conference established the rules among European powers for carving up Africa…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The First Great Schism promoted the shift to monotheistic religions as those who did not practice Christianity, called heretics, were punished after the separation. Civilization spread as the Roman Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Church both expanded and gained followers. Alternatively, The Second Great Schism contributed to the spread of monotheism and civilization after the Council of Constance (1414-1417) called to end the schism. Although the Council did not reform Christianity, it made the Protestant reformation possible which led to the spread of civilization in the form of Lutheranism and other reforms.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From 100 CE to 1750 CE the Christian Church constantly repeats history, further transforming itself, into a powerful religion. The split of the Eastern…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The four centuries covered in this chapter mark a transitory phase in the history of East Asia. During this time, the threat of conquest from Mongol tribes dissipated. On the other hand, western European merchants and governments encroached upon the kingdoms of Japan, Korea, and China. More and more, East Asia was connected to the broader global trading patterns that western Europeans established during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Unlike in native civilizations and kingdoms in the Americas, European encroachment in East Asia did not result in the collapse of local political and cultural traditions. Indeed, cultural and political traditions continued to evolve along historical patterns. In 1800, East Asian societies were still remarkably cohesive despite the dramatic changes in global economic and political patterns occurring all around them.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Creighton, M. (1843-1901), A History of the Papacy from the Great Schism to the Sack of Rome (London: Longmans, Green, and co., 1907-1919), 8.…

    • 3815 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Schism

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The great schism also known as the East - West Schism, was the event that divided Christianity into 2 groups, the Western (roman) Catholicism and the Eastern Orthodoxy. Throughout the year of 1054, the church remained largely unchanged, it grew in power and became more and more insular. But then due to pressures from within the church, it experienced its first major spilt which is now known as "The Great Schism". Papal authority, geography and language, liturgical practices and sacraments, sacred icons instead of statues, married priests and the belief of trinity were the primary reasons for the "split".…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Changing West

    • 725 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If I were to choose from the three, I would choose to be a farmer. The reason I chose being a farmer is because farming would be very difficult, but safer than being a miner or a cowboy. Being a farmer would be safer since being a miner could result in caving while mining and being a cowboy is also risky because you could fall into a hole while herding livestock or have the risk of being rundown by the livestock if they get scared and go crazy. Being a farmer can give you opportunities because by raising livestock, it can give you money as well as food to eat. Unfortunately, farming is harder than it is, because farmers depend on the seasons; for example, in summer, if it is too hot, it will dry the soil, making farming useless, or in winter, if begins to snow, it will cover the whole livestock in snow and kill the livestock from the cold. Being a farmer has its pros and cons, but if you put a little sweat, livestock might be able to survive any season.…

    • 725 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays